Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 457–472

Butterfly response to floral resources during early establishment at a heterogeneous prairie biomass production site in Iowa, USA

  • Mark C. Myers
  • Benjamin J. Hoksch
  • James T. Mason
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

In the Midwestern USA, current biofuel production systems rely on high input monoculture crops that do little to support native biodiversity. The University of Northern Iowa’s Tallgrass Prairie Center is investigating the feasibility of cultivating and harvesting diverse mixes of native prairie vegetation for use as a sustainable biofuel in a manner that also conserves biodiversity and protects soil and water resources. In 2009, we established 48 research plots on three soil types at an Iowa site with a uniform history of row crop production. We seeded each plot with one of four treatments of native prairie vegetation: (1) switchgrass monoculture, (2) warm-season grass mix (5 grass species), (3) biomass mix (16 species of grasses, legumes, and forbs), or (4) prairie mix (32 species of grasses, legumes, forbs, and sedges). In 2010, we measured vegetation characteristics and studied butterfly use of the plots to investigate the hypothesis that more diverse plant communities would support a greater abundance and diversity of butterflies. Habitat characteristics varied significantly among the plots by treatment and soil type, and butterflies responded rapidly to variation in floral abundance and richness. Averaged over the entire growing season, butterflies were six times more abundant and twice as species rich in the biomass and prairie mix plots compared to the warm-season grass and switchgrass plots. Our results suggest that implementation of biomass production using diverse mixes of native prairie vegetation on marginal lands could have positive effects on the maintenance of butterfly populations in agricultural landscapes.

Keywords

Bioenergy Community ecology Grassland restoration Lepidoptera Species richness 

References

  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andow DA (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu Rev Entomol 36:561–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brower LP, Fink LS, Walford P (2006) Fueling the fall migration of the monarch butterfly. Integr Comp Biol 46:1123–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Conrad KF, Warren MS, Fox R, Parsons MS, Woiwod IP (2006) Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biol Conserv 132:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale VH, Kline KL, Wiens J, Fargione J (2010) Biofuels: implications for land use and biodiversity. Biofuels and sustainability reports. Ecologial Society of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Daubenmire R (1959) A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci 33:43–64Google Scholar
  10. Davis AK, Rendon-Salinas E (2009) Are female monarch butterflies declining in eastern North America? Evidence of a 30-year change in sex ratios at Mexican overwintering sites. Biol Lett 6:45–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis JD, Debinski DM, Danielson BJ (2007) Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Landsc Ecol 22:1341–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis JD, Hendrix SD, Debinski DM, Hemsley CJ (2008) Butterfly, bee and forb community composition and cross-taxon incongruence in tallgrass prairie fragments. J Insect Conserv 12:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davros NM, Debinski DM, Reeder KF, Hohman WL (2006) Butterflies and continuous conservation reserve program filter strips: landscape considerations. Wildl Soc Bull 34:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Debinski D, Kelly L (1998) Decline of Iowa populations of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) Drury. J Iowa Acad Sci 105:16–22Google Scholar
  15. Dover JW, Rescia A, Fungariño S, Fairburn J, Carey P, Lunt P, Dennis RLH, Dover CJ (2010) Can hay harvesting detrimentally affect adult butterfly abundance? J Insect Conserv 14:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fargione JE, Cooper TR, Flaspohler DJ, Hill J, Lehman C, Tilman D, McCoy T, McLeod S, Nelson EJ, Oberhauser KS (2009) Bioenergy and wildlife: threats and opportunities for grassland conservation. Bioscience 59:767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fargione J, Plevin RJ, Hill JD (2010) The ecological impact of biofuels. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:351–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forister ML, McCall AC, Sanders NJ, Fordyce JA, Thorne JH, O’Brien J, Waetjen DP, Shapiro AM (2010) Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:2088–2092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardiner MA, Tuell JK, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ascher JS, Landis DA (2010) Implications of three biofuel crops for beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Bioenerg Res 3:6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2007) Biodiversity and extinction: losing the common and the widespread. Prog Phys Geog 31:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:1–9Google Scholar
  22. Hawkins B, Porter E (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am Nat 161:40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill J (2009) Environmental costs and benefits of transportation biofuel production from food-and lignocellulose-based energy crops: a review. Sustain Agric part 1:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:11206–11210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofstrand D (2010) Understanding Iowa corn suitability ratings (CSR). Iowa State University Extension, File C2-86. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/pdf/c2-86.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2011
  26. Humbert J-Y, Ghazoul J, Walter T (2009) Meadow harvesting techniques and their impacts on field fauna. Agric Ecosys Environ 130:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Humbert J-Y, Ghazoul J, Sauter GJ, Walter T (2010) Impact of different meadow mowing techniques on field invertebrates. J Appl Entomol 134:592–599Google Scholar
  28. Isaacs R, Tuell J, Fiedler A, Gardiner M, Landis D (2009) Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: the role of native plants. Front Ecol Env 7:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas J, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knops JM, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J, Ritchie ME, Howe KM, Reich PB, Siemann E, Groth J (1999) Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecol Lett 2:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koh LP, Ghazoul J (2008) Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities. Biol Conserv 141:2450–2460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koricheva J, Mulder CP, Schmid B, Joshi J, Huss-Danell K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grasslands. Oecologia 125:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Kuussaari M, Lindborg R, Öckinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Pöyry J, Raatikainen KM, Sang A, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol Lett 13:597–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landis DA, Werling BP (2010) Arthropods and biofuel production systems in North America. Insect Sci 17:220–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Legendre P, Gallagher E (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller NG, Wassenaar LI, Hobson KA, Norris DR (2011) Monarch butterflies cross the Appalachians from the west to recolonize the east coast of North America. Biol Lett 7:43–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mutel CF (2007) The emerald horizon: the history of nature in Iowa. University of Iowa Press, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  39. Perner J, Wytrykush C, Kahmen A, Buchmann N, Egerer I, Creutzburg S, Odat N, Audorff V, Weisser WW (2005) Effects of plant diversity, plant productivity and habitat parameters on arthropod abundance in montane European grasslands. Ecography 28:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polus E, Vandewoestijne S, Choutt J, Baguette M (2007) Tracking the effects of one century of habitat loss and fragmentation on calcareous grassland butterfly communities. Biodivers Conserv 16:3423–3436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pywell RF, Meek WR, Hulmes L, Hulmes S, James KL, Nowakowski M, Carvell C (2011) Management to enhance pollen and nectar resources for bumblebees and butterflies within intensively farmed landscapes. J Insect Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9383-x
  42. Reeder KF, Debinski DM, Danielson BJ (2005) Factors affecting butterfly use of filter strips in Midwestern USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ries L, Debinski DM, Wieland ML (2001) Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conserv Biol 15:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robel RJ, Briggs JN, Dayton AD, Hulbert LC (1970) Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. J Range Manag 23:295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlicht DW, Orwig TT (1990) Sequential use of niche by prairie obligate skipper butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperidae) with implications for management. Proc N Am Prairie Conf 12:137–140Google Scholar
  47. Schlicht DW, Orwig TT (1998) The status of Iowa’s Lepidoptera. J Iowa Acad Sci 105:82–88Google Scholar
  48. Scott JA (1992) The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Secchi S, Gassman PW, Williams JR, Babcock BA (2009) Corn-based ethanol and environmental quality: a case of Iowa and the Conservation Reserve Program. Environ Manag 44:732–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Semere T, Slater FM (2007) Invertebrate populations in miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields. Biomass Bioenerg 31:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shepherd S, Debinski DM (2005) Evaluation of isolated and integrated prairie reconstructions as habitat for prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 126:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siemann E (1998) Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79:2057–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am Nat 152:738–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith D (1998) Iowa prairie: original extent and loss, preservation and recovery attempts. J Iowa Acad Sci 105:94–108Google Scholar
  55. Steckley S (2006) Soil survey of Black Hawk County, Iowa. Natural resources conservation service, Des Moines, Iowa, USA. http://soils.usda.gov/survey/online_surveys/iowa/IA013/black.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2011
  56. Stefanescu C, Peñuelas J, Filella I (2009) Rapid changes in butterfly communities following the abandonment of grasslands: a case study. Insect Conserv Divers 2:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stefanescu C, Torre I, Jubany J, Páramo F (2010) Recent trends in butterfly populations from north-east Spain and Andorra in the light of habitat and climate change. J Insect Conserv 15:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1997) Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fields. Oecologia 109:294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2001) Succession of bee communities on fallows. Ecography 24:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Summerville KS, Conoan CJ, Steichen RM (2006) Species traits as predictors of lepidopteran composition in restored and remnant tallgrass prairies. Ecol Appl 16:891–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Swengel AB (1996) Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 76:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2001) Effects of prairie and barrens management on butterfly faunal composition. Biodiver Conserv 10:1757–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2007) Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites. J Insect Conserv 11:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Swengel S, Schlicht D, Olsen F, Swengel A (2010) Declines of prairie butterflies in the midwestern USA. J Insect Conserv 15:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Dyck H, Van Strien AJ, Maes D, Van Swaay CAM (2009) Declines in common, widespread butterflies in a landscape under intense human use. Conserv Biol 23:957–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogel JA, Debinski DM, Koford RR, Miller JR (2007) Butterfly responses to prairie restoration through fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 140:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vogel JA, Koford RR, Debinski DM (2010) Direct and indirect responses of tallgrass prairie butterflies to prescribed burning. J Insect Conserv 14:663–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. WallisDeVries MF, Ens SH (2008) Effects of habitat quality and isolation on the colonization of restored heathlands by butterflies. Restor Ecol 18:390–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams DW, Jackson LL, Smith DD (2007) Effects of frequent mowing on survival and persistence of forbs seeded into a species-poor grassland. Restor Ecol 15:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zobel M (1997) The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol 12:266–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark C. Myers
    • 1
  • Benjamin J. Hoksch
    • 1
  • James T. Mason
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA
  2. 2.Tallgrass Prairie CenterUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations