Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 617–632 | Cite as

A butterfly hotspot in western China, its environmental threats and conservation

  • Xiu-shan Li
  • Ya-lin ZhangEmail author
  • Jian-hui Fang
  • Oliver Schweiger
  • Josef Settele


A butterfly species inventory of the Bifeng Valley within the Baishuijiang Natural Reserve in Gansu Province in China was conducted and several aspects of biodiversity were analyzed in a biogeographical context. One hundred and eighty-four species have been encountered belonging to 12 families and 99 genera. According to the total area of the Bifeng Valley of 30 km², an estimated density of six butterfly species per km² can be regarded as particularly high. A transect study in Bifeng Valley, aimed to quantify anthropogenic impact and the influence of remaining natural habitat on the occurrence of butterfly species and individuals. With higher levels of human disturbance and corresponding decreasing amount of natural habitat species numbers and overall butterfly abundance decreased. First suggestions on the inclusion of the rarest species in the area into certain conservation categories are provided. This is intended as a starting point to highlight conservation necessities and deficiencies in areas which are easily ignored as these are only rarely highlighted in an national and even more so in an international context.


Baishuijiang reserve Biogeography Local risks assessment Conservation 



In process of this research we received vigorous support from Mr. Hongjian Wang who works for the Management Bureau of the Baishuijiang Natural Reserve, Gansu Province. Professor Mingtang Liu in Northwest A & F University identified butterfly specimens. This study was financed by scientific enterprise project of Gansu province Qs022-C31-069. Discussion of results also was possible through the German-Chinese year of Science, funded by BMBF (German Ministry for Science and Education) through the project LepiPub. XL, JS and OS also received funding via the EU FP 6 Integrated Project “ALARM” (Assessing LArge scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods: GOCE-CT-2003-506675;; Settele et al. 2005a), the EU FP 6 funded BiodivERsA project CLIMIT (Climate change impacts on insects and their mitigation;; Settele and Kühn 2009; Thomas et al. 2009) and the EU FP 7 Integrated Project SCALES (grant 226 852; Henle et al. 2010) and the EU FP 7 Collaborative Project STEP (grant 244090–STEP–CP–FP).


  1. Akcakaya RH, Ferson S, Burgman MA, Keith DA, Mace G, Todd C (2000) Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty. Cons Biol 14:1001–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) (2003) Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen ZN, Zeng Y (2001) The butterfly diversity of different habitat types in Qilian, Qinghai Province. Biodivers Sci 2:109–114Google Scholar
  4. Cheng KW, Zang RG (2004) Advances in species endangerment assessment. Biodivers Sci 12:534–540Google Scholar
  5. Chou I (2000) Monographia rhopalocerorum sinensium. Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House, ZhengzhouGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Abrera B (1982) Butterflies of the oriental region, part 1. Hill House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Abrera B (1985) Butterflies of the oriental region, part 2. Hill House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Abrera B (1986) Butterflies of the oriental region, part 3. Hill House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Abrera B (1990) Butterflies of the holarctic region, part 1. Hill House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Abrera B (1992) Butterflies of the Holarctic region, part 2. Hill House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Abrera B (1993) Butterflies of the Holarctic region, part 3. Hill House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  12. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodiv Conserv 15:1943–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding DS (1996) Faunistic structure and vertical distribution of butterflies in Jiangxi Wuyishan mountain nature reserve. Acta Entomologica Sinica 39:393–407Google Scholar
  14. Dover J, Settele J (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J Insect Conserv 13:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrlich PR, Dennis DM (1987) Conservation lessens from long-term studies of checkerspot butterflies. Conserv Biol 1:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds) (2004) On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Field CB, Daily GC, Davis FW, Gaines S, Matson PA, Melack J, Miller NL (1999) Confronting climate change in California ccological impacts on the Golden State, a report of the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Ecological Society of America, Washington DC;
  18. Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (1997) Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanski I, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M, Lei GC (1995) Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henle K, Kunin WE, Schweiger O, Schmeller DS, Grobelnik V, Matsinos Y, Pantis J, Penev L, Potts SG, Ring I, Similä J, Tzanopoulos J, van den Hove S, Baguette M, Clobert J, Excoffier L, Framstad E, Grodzinska-Jurczak M, Lengyel S, Marty P, Moilanen A, Porcher E, Storch D, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes MT, Zobel M, Settele J (2010) Securing the conservation of biodiversity across administrative levels and spatial, temporal, and ecological scales—research needs and approaches of the SCALES project. GAIA 19:187–193Google Scholar
  22. Hovestadt T, Nieminen M (2009) Costs and benefits of dispersal in butterflies. In: Settele J, Shreeve T, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–106Google Scholar
  23. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN species survival commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. IUCN (2003) Guidelines for application of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiang SL, Zhang LJ (2000) Composition and fauna analysis of butterflies in the Ziwu Mountains of east Gansu Province. J Lanzhou Univ (Nat Sci) 36(5):112–117Google Scholar
  27. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper and Row Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kühn E, Feldmann R, Thomas JA, Settele J (2005) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 1: general concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia/MoscowGoogle Scholar
  29. Lappalainen JH, Koricheva J, Helander ML, Haukioja E (1999) Densities of endophytic fungi and performance of leafminers (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae) on birch along a pollution gradient. Environ Pollut 104:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li SH, Hou J (2004) Study on butterfly fauna in the Simian Mountains in Chongqing Municiplaty. J Southwest Agric Univ 26:405–408Google Scholar
  31. Li S, Wan J, Shao W (1998) Composition of butterfly fauna in Chongqing. J Southwest Agric Univ 20:178–184Google Scholar
  32. Li XS, Zhang YL, Luo YQ, Settele J (2006) Study on life history, life table, habitat and conservation of Byasa impediens (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Acta Ecol Sin 10:3184–3197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li XS, Luo YQ, Zhang YL, Schweiger O, Settele J, Yang QS (2010) On the conservation biology of a Chinese population of the birdwing Troides aeacus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Insect Conserv 14:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mace GM (1995) Classification of threatened species and its role in conservation planning. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 197–213Google Scholar
  35. Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maes D, Van Dyck H (2005) Habitat quality and biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened butterfly versus a multispecies group for wet heath lands in Belgium. Biol Conserv 123:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mulder C, Aldenberg T, de Zwart D, van Wijnen HJ, Breure AM (2005) Evaluating the impact of pollution on plant—lepidoptera relationships. Environmetrics 16:357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. New TR, Collins MN (1991) Swallowtail butterflies: an action plan for their conservation. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfeifer MA, Henle K, Settele J (2007) Populations with explicit borders in space and time: concept, terminology, and estimation of characteristic parameters. Acta Biotheor 55:305–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Philip S (2004) Estimating local extinction rates over successive time-frames. Biol Conserv 121:281–287Google Scholar
  42. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing change in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation: the British butterfly monitoring scheme. Conservation biology series no. 1. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Reid WV (1992) How many species will there be? In: Whitmore TC, Sayer JA (eds) Tropical deforestation and species extinction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 55–57Google Scholar
  45. Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O, Klotz S, Kühn I (2008) Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89:3472–3479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schweiger O, Heikkinen RK, Harpke A, Hickler T, Klotz S, Kudrna O, Kühn I, Pöyry J, Settele J (2011) Increasing range mismatching of interacting species under global change is related to their ecological characteristics. Global Ecol BiogeogrGoogle Scholar
  47. Settele J, Kühn E (2009) Insect conservation. Science 325:41–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Settele J, Feldmann R, Reinhardt R (2000) Die Tagfalter Deutschlands. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  49. Settele J, Hammen V, Hulme P, Karlson U, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kunin W, Marion G, O’Connor M, Petanidou T, Peterson K, Potts S, Pritchard H, Pysek P, Rounsevell M, Spangenberg J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes M, Vighi M, Zobel M, Kühn I (2005a) ALARM–Assessing large-scale environmental risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA 14(1):69–72Google Scholar
  50. Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (2005b) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia/MoscowGoogle Scholar
  51. Settele J, Kudrna O, Harpke A, Kühn I, van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Hanspach J, Hickler T, Kühn E, van Halder I, Veling K, Vliegenthart A, Wynhoff I, Schweiger O (2008) Climatic risk Atlas of European Butterflies. BioRisk 1:1–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Settele J, Shreeve T, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (eds) (2009) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith FDM, May RM, Pellew R, Johnson TH, Walter KS (1993) Estimation of extinction rates. Nature 364:494–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. State Administration of Environmental Protection (1998) Research report on the status of biodiversity in China. China Environmental Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 149–197Google Scholar
  56. Thomas JA, Clarke RT (2004) Extinction rates and butterflies. Science 305:1563–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas CD, Mallorie HC (1985) Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco. Biol Conserv 33:95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME, Clarke RT (1998) Effects of latitude, altitude and climate on the habitat and conservation of the endangered butterfly Maculinea arion and its Myrmica ant hosts. J Insect Conserv 2:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc Roy Soc B 268:1791–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004a) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004b) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science 325:80–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Swaay CAM, Nowicki P, Settele J, van Strien AJ (2008) Butterfly monitoring in Europe—methods, applications and perspectives. Biodivers Conserv 17:3455–3469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Swaay CAM, Maes D, Collins S, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I, Cuttelod A (2010) Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: how red is the Red List of European butterflies? Biol Conserv. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.034
  65. Volkov I, Banavar JR, Hubbell SP, Maritan A (2003) Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424:1035–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wagner DL, Nelson MW, Schweitzer DF (2003) Shrub land Lepidoptera of southern New England and southeastern New York: ecology, conservation, and management. Forest Ecol Manag 185:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang HJ (2005) Butterfly summary of Baishuijiang reserve of Gansu Province. Chin Butterflies 10:19–46Google Scholar
  68. Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 11:1451–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wu GH, Zhang KR (1997) Comprehensive investigation report of Gansu Baishuijiang national natural reserve. Gansu Scientific and Technological Publishing House, LanzhouGoogle Scholar
  70. Xie Y, Wang S (1995) IUCN red list categories. Chin Biodivers 3:234–239Google Scholar
  71. Xu XF (1998) Study of bionomics of Luehdorfia chinensis leech. J Ningde Teach Coll (Nat Sci) 10:179–180Google Scholar
  72. Yamamoto N, Yokoyama J, Kawata M (2007) Relative resource abundance explains butterfly biodiversity in island communities. PNAS 104:10524–10529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yang DR (1998) Studies on the structure of the butterfly community and diversity in the fragmentary tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna, China. Acta Entom Sin 41:48–55Google Scholar
  74. Yang ZZ, Mao BY (2000) A survey of the butterflies in the Xishuangbanna’s Mengla nature reserve. J Dali Teach Coll 3 (Ceneral Serial No. 47):88–92Google Scholar
  75. Yang P, Deng HL, Qi B, Liu Q (2005) The occupied rate of microhabitats, sampled percentage of species and relative abundance of butterfly communities in the Three Gorges Reservoir area of the Yangtze River. Acta Ecol Sin 25(3):543–554Google Scholar
  76. Yuan DC (2001) Insect endangerment categories and protection grades. Entomol Knowl 38:4–7Google Scholar
  77. Zhao L (1997) Butterflies of Hongkang. Sichuan J Zool 16:68–69Google Scholar
  78. Zhou X, Sun L, Pan WS, Lv Z, Ni YN (2001) The faunal study on the butterflies of the south slope of Qinling Mountains. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium, Universitatis Pekinensis 37:454–469Google Scholar
  79. Zhu PY (1994) Butterflies resource and its developing and use in Taiwan. Jiangxi Plant Prot 17:28–31Google Scholar
  80. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV (2001) Effects of pollution-induced habitat disturbance on the response of willows to simulated herbivory. J Ecol 89:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiu-shan Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ya-lin Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jian-hui Fang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Oliver Schweiger
    • 4
  • Josef Settele
    • 4
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of EducationEntomological Museum of Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, ShaanxiChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Forest Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of EducationBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Forest Pests and Disease Control and Quarantine Station, Gansu ProvinceLanzhou, GansuChina
  4. 4.UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community EcologyHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations