Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 1–2, pp 259–268 | Cite as

Recent evidence for the climate change threat to Lepidoptera and other insects

Original Paper

Abstract

Climate change is now estimated by some biologists to be the main threat to biodiversity, but doubts persist regarding which species are most at risk, and how best to adapt conservation management. Insects are expected to be highly responsive to climate change, because they have short life cycles which are strongly influenced by temperature. Insects also constitute the most diverse taxonomic group, carrying out biotic interactions of importance for ecological functioning and ecosystem services, so their responses to climate change are likely to be of considerable wider ecological significance. However, a review of recent published evidence of observed and modelled effects of climate change in ten high-ranking journals shows that comparatively few such studies have focused on insects. The majority of these studies are on Lepidoptera, because of the existence of detailed contemporary and historical datasets. These biases in published information may influence conclusions regarding the threat of climate change to insect biodiversity. Assessment of the vulnerability of insect species protected by the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats also emphasises that most information is available for the Lepidoptera. In the absence of the necessary data to carry out detailed assessments of the likely effects of climate change on most threatened insects, we consider how autecological studies may help to illuminate the potential vulnerability of species, and draw preliminary conclusions about the priorities for insect conservation and research in a changing climate.

Keywords

Bioclimate models Conservation priorities Flagship species Global change Range shifts 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We were funded by the European Social Fund (Project “Climate Change and Landscape: Imagining the Future”) and by the Council of Europe. RJW would like to thank The Bern Convention’s Group of Experts on Biodiversity and Climate Change for assistance and discussion, particularly Deborah Procter, Vernon Heywood, Carolina Lasén Díaz and Véronique du Cussac.

References

  1. Adamski P, Witkowski ZJ (2007) Effectiveness of population recovery projects based on captive breeding. Biol Conserv 140:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton S, Gutiérrez D, Wilson RJ (2009) Effects of temperature and elevation on habitat use by a rare mountain butterfly: implications for species responses to climate change. Ecol Entomol 34:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres MP, Lombardero MJ (2000) Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens. Sci Total Environ 262:263–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID et al (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperatures on insect herbivores. Global Change Biol 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford MA, Jones TH, Bardgett RD et al (2002) Impacts of soil faunal community composition on model grassland ecosystems. Science 298:615–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brommer JE, Fred MS (1999) Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecol Entomol 24:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buse J, Schroder B, Assmann T (2007) Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle—a case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol Conserv 137:372–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buse J, Ranius T, Assmann T (2008) An endangered longhorn beetle associated with old oaks and its possible role as an ecosystem engineer. Conserv Biol 22:329–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sjogren-Gulve P (2007) Limited dispersal by the rare scarce heath butterfly—potential consequences for population persistence. J Insect Conserv 11:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sjogren-Gulve P, Berglind SA (2008) Effects of patch characteristics and isolation on relative abundance of the scarce heath butterfly Coenonympha hero (Nymphalidae). J Insect Conserv 12:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen I-C, Shiu H-J, Benedick S et al (2009) Elevation increases in moth assemblages over 42 years on a tropical mountain. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106:1479–1483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Colwell RK, Brehm G, Cardelús CL, Gilman AC, Longino JT (2008) Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322:258–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Council of Europe (2010) Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats Appendix II. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/FR/Treaties/Html/104-2.htm. Accessed 10 May 2010
  15. Dangles O, Carpio C, Barragan AR, Zeddam JL, Silvain JF (2008) Temperature as a key driver of ecological sorting among invasive pest species in the tropical Andes. Ecol Appl 18:1795–1809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies ZG, Wilson RJ, Brereton TM, Thomas CD (2005) The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story. Biol Conserv 124:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies ZG, Wilson RJ, Coles S, Thomas CD (2006) Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterfly, in response to climate warming. J Anim Ecol 75:247–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De Groot M, Rebeusek F, Grobelnik V, Govedic M, Salamun A, Verovnik R (2009) Distribution modelling as an approach to the conservation of a threatened alpine endemic butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Eur J Entomol 106:77–84Google Scholar
  19. Descimon H, Bachelard P, Boitier E, Pierrat V (2006) Decline and extinction of Parnassius apollo populations in France-continued. In: Kühn E, Feldmann R, Thomas JA, Settele J (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol 1 General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia, pp 114–115Google Scholar
  20. Franco AMA, Hill JK, Kitschke C, Collingham YC, Roy DB, Fox R, Huntley B, Thomas CD (2006) Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Global Change Biol 12:1545–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordo O, Sanz JJ (2005) Phenology and climate change: a long-term study in a Mediterranean locality. Oecologia 146:484–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordo O, Sanz JJ (2006) Temporal trends in phenology of the honey bee Apis mellifera (L.) and the small white Pieris rapae (L.) in the Iberian Peninsula (1952–2004). Ecol Entomol 31:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goulson D, Derwent LC, Hanley ME, Dunn DW, Abolins SR (2005) Predicting calyptrate fly populations from the weather, and probable consequences of climate change. J Appl Ecol 42:795–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrington R (2002) Insect pests and global environmental change. In: Douglas I (ed) Encyclopedia of global environmental change, vol. 3. Wiley, Chichester, pp 381–386Google Scholar
  25. Hassall C, Thompson DJ, French GC, Harvey IF (2007) Historical changes in the phenology of British Odonata are related to climate. Global Change Biol 13:933–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedin J, Ranius T, Nilsson SG, Smith HG (2008) Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry. Biodivers Conserv 17:675–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Poyry J (2005) New insights into butterfly-environment relationships using partitioning methods. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2203–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Toivonen T (2007) Modelling the spatial distribution of a threatened butterfly: impacts of scale and statistical technique. Landscape Urban Plan 79:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Thomas CD (2005) A northward shift of range margins in British Odonata. Global Change Biol 11:502–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Fox R, Thomas CD (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Global Change Biol 12:450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hughes L, Mcintyre S et al (2008) Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science 321:345–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoyle M, James M (2005) Global warming, human population pressure, and viability of the world’s smallest butterfly. Conserv Biol 19:1113–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM (2006) Distribution determinants of endangered Iberian spider Macrothele calpeiana (Araneae, Hexathelidae). Environ Entomol 35:1491–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiménez-Valverde A, García-Díez T, Bogaerts S (2007) First records of the endangered spider Macrothele calpeiana (Walckenaer, 1805) (Hexathelidae) in Portugal. Bol Soc Entomol Aragonesa 41:445–446Google Scholar
  35. Jiménez-Valverde A, Gómez JF, Lobo JM, Baselga A, Hortal J (2008) Challenging species distribution models: the case of Maculinea nausithous in the Iberian Peninsula. Ann Zool Fenn 45:200–210Google Scholar
  36. Kindvall O (1996) Habitat heterogeneity and survival in a bush cricket metapopulation. Ecology 77:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA et al (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kristin A, Kanuch P (2007) Population, ecology and morphology of Saga pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the northern limit of its distribution. Eur J Entomol 104:73–79Google Scholar
  39. Kuras T, Benes J, Fric Z, Konvicka M (2003) Dispersal patterns of endemic alpine butterflies with contrasting population structures: Erebia epiphron and E. sudetica. Popul Ecol 45:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leather SR (2010) Institutional vertebratism threatens UK food security. Trends Ecol Evol 24:413–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H, Asner GP, Field CB, Ackerley DD (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature 462:1052–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Logan JA, Regniere J, Gray DR, Munson AS (2007) Risk assessment in the face of a changing environment: gypsy moth and climate change in Utah. Ecol Appl 17:101–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Toivonen T (2007) Modelling butterfly distribution based on remote sensing data. J Biogeog 29:1027–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ et al (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: the IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol 22:1424–1442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Meglecz E, Neve G, Pecsenye K, Varga Z (1999) Genetic variations in space and time in Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera) populations in north-east Hungary: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 89:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menéndez R (2007) How are insects responding to global warming? Tijdschr Entomol 150:355–365Google Scholar
  47. Menéndez R, González Megías A, Hill JK et al (2006) Species richness changes lag behind climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1465–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mouquet N, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Clarke RT, Hochberg ME (2005) Population dynamics and conservation of a specialized predator: a case study of Maculinea arion. Ecol Monogr 75:525–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakicenovic N et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Negro M, Casale A, Migliore L, Palestrini C, Rolando A (2007) The effect of local anthropogenic habitat heterogeneity on assemblages of carabids (Coleoptera, Caraboidea) endemic to the Alps. Biodiv Conserv 16:3919–3932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Negro M, Casale A, Migliore L, Palestrini C, Rolando A (2008) Habitat use and movement patterns in the endangered ground beetle species, Carabus olympiae (Coleoptera : Carabidae). Eur J Entomol 105:105–112Google Scholar
  52. Oliver T, Roy DB, Hill JK, Brereton T, Thomas CD (2010) Heterogeneous landscapes promote population stability. Ecol Lett 13:473–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Parmesan C (1996) Climate and species range. Nature 382:765–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C et al (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:579–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peñuelas J, Filella I, Comas P (2002) Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region. Global Change Biol 8:531–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pöyry J, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Kuussaari M, Saarinen K (2009) Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies. Global Change Biol 15:732–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ranius T (2000) Minimum viable metapopulation size of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Anim Conserv 3:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ranius T (2007) Extinction risks in metapopulations of a beetle inhabiting hollow trees predicted from time series. Ecography 30:716–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Renault D, Vernon P, Vannier G (2005) Critical thermal maximum and body water loss in first instar larvae of three Cetoniidae species (Coleoptera). J Thermal Biol 30:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roy DB, Sparks TH (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Global Change Biol 6:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O, Klotz S, Kühn I (2008) Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89:3472–3479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Settele J, Kudrna O, Harpke A et al (2008) Climatic risk atlas of European butterflies. BioRisk 1 special issue. Pensoft, Sofia-MoscowGoogle Scholar
  65. Spangenberg JH (2007) Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustain Dev 15:343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stefanescu C, Peñuelas J, Filella I (2003) Effects of climatic change on the phenology of butterflies in the northwest Mediterranean Basin. Global Change Biol 9:1494–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD, Yates TJ, Greatorex-Davies JN (1997) Correlated extinctions, colonizations and population fluctuations in a highly connected ringlet butterfly metapopulation. Oecologia 109:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas JA (1993) Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early-successional habitats. Ecography 16:278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME, Clarke RT (1998) Effects of latitude, altitude and climate on the habitat and conservation of the endangered butterfly Maculinea arion and its Myrmica ant hosts. J Insect Conserv 2:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science 325:80–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Valimaki P, Itamies J (2003) Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats—effects of patch characteristics. Ecography 26:679–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Valimaki P, Itamies J (2005) Effects of canopy coverage on the immature stages of the Clouded Apollo butterfly [Parnassius mnemosyne (L.)] with observations on larval behaviour. Entomol Fennica 16:117–123Google Scholar
  74. WallisDeVries MF, Van Swaay CAM (2006) Global warming and excess nitrogen may induce butterfly decline by microclimatic cooling. Global Change Biol 12:1620–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA et al (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Willis SG, Hill JK, Thomas CD et al (2009) Assisted colonization in a changing climate: a test-study using two UK butterflies. Conserv Lett 2:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson RJ, Gutiérrez D, Gutiérrez J, Martínez D, Agudo R, Monserrat VJ (2005) Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change. Ecol Lett 8:1138–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilson RJ, Davies ZG, Thomas CD (2007) Insects and climate change: processes, patterns and implications for conservation. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. Proceedings of the royal entomological society’s 22nd symposium. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 245–279Google Scholar
  80. Wilson RJ, Davies ZG, Thomas CD (2009) Modelling the effect of habitat fragmentation on range expansion in a butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:1421–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and ConservationUniversity of ExeterPenrynUK

Personalised recommendations