Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 1–2, pp 221–232 | Cite as

New tools to boost butterfly habitat quality in existing grass buffer strips

  • Robin J. BlakeEmail author
  • Ben A. Woodcock
  • Duncan B. Westbury
  • Peter Sutton
  • Simon G. Potts
Original Paper


There are approximately 29,000 ha of grass buffer strips in the UK under Agri-Environment Schemes; however, typically they are floristically poor and as such are of limited biodiversity value. Introducing a sown wildflower component has the potential to increase dramatically the value of these buffer strips for a suite of native species, including butterflies. This study investigates management practices aiming to promote the establishment and maintenance of wildflowers in existing buffer strips. The effectiveness of two methods used to increase the establishment of wildflowers for the benefit of native butterfly species were tested, both individually and in combination. The management practices were: (1) the application of a selective graminicide (fluazifop-P-butyl) which reduces the dominance of competitive grasses; and (2) scarification of the soil which creates germination niches for sown wildflower seeds. A wildflower seed mix consisting of nine species was sown in conjunction with the scarification treatment. Responses of wildflowers and butterflies were monitored for two years after establishment. Results indicate that the combined scarification and graminicide treatment produced the greatest cover and species richness of sown wildflowers. Butterfly abundance, species richness and diversity were positively correlated with sown wildflower species richness, with the highest values in the combined scarification and graminicide treatment. These findings have confirmed the importance of both scarification as a means of introducing wildflower seed into existing buffer strips, and subsequent management using graminicides, for the benefit of butterflies. Application of this approach could provide tools to help butterfly conservation on farmland in the future.


Buffer strips Wildflowers Butterflies Management Agri-environment scheme Graminicide 



This project was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Syngenta. We would like to thank the farmers Mark Robins (Farley Estates, Reading) and Peter Clarke (Adbury Park Farm, Newbury) for allowing access to their land for data collection.


  1. Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millenium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Boatman ND (1992) Improvement of field margin habitat by selective control of annual weeds. Asp Appl Biol 29:431–436Google Scholar
  3. Butterfly Conservation, CEH, DEFRA, Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2009) Populations of butterflies on farmland in England. Accessed 26 May 2010
  4. Cheffings CM, Farrell L (2005) Species status report no. 7: the vascular plant red data list for Great Britain. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbet S (1987) More bees make better crops. New Sci 115:40–43Google Scholar
  6. Critchley CNR, Fowbert JA, Sherwood AJ, Pywell RF (2006) Vegetation development of sown grass margins in arable fields under a countrywide agri-environment scheme. Biol Conserv 132:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Defra (2008) Entry level stewardship handbook, 2nd edn. Natural England, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis RLH (1992) Appendix 1. A check list of British butterflies and their hostplants. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Dover JW (1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 33:723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards GR, Crawley MJ (1999) Herbivores, seed banks and seedling recruitment in mesic grassland. J Ecol 87:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards M, Jenner M (2005) Field guide to the bumblebees of Great Britain and Ireland. Ocelli, EastbourneGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards AR, Mortimer SR, Lawson CS, Westbury DB, Harris SJ, Woodcock BA, Brown VK (2007) Hay strewing, brush harvesting of seed and soil disturbance as tools for the enhancement of botanical diversity in grasslands. Biol Conserv 134:372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feber RE, Smith H, Macdonald DW (1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J Appl Ecol 33:1191–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Field RG, Gardiner T, Mason CF, Hill J (2006) Countryside stewardship scheme and butterflies: a study of plant and butterfly species richness. Biodivers Conserv 15:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox R, Warren MS, Asher J, Brereton TM, Roy DB (2007) The state of Britain’s butterflies 2007. Butterfly Conservation and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, WarehamGoogle Scholar
  16. Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Ent 53:191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grubb PJ (1977) Maintenance of species-richness in plant communities—importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev Camb Phil Soc 52:107–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haaland C, Gyllin M (2010) Butterflies and bumblebees in greenways and sown wildflower strips in southern Sweden. J Insect Cons 14:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammond PC, Miller JC (1998) Comparison of the biodiversity of Lepidoptera within three forested ecosystems. Ann Ent Soc Am 91:323–328Google Scholar
  20. Herbert D, Walker KA, Price LJ, Cole DJ, Pallett KE, Ridley SM, Harwood JL (1997) Acetyl-CoA carboxylase—a graminicide target site. Pestic Sci 50:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofmann M, Isselstein J (2004) Seedling recruitment on agriculturally improved mesic grassland: the influence of disturbance and management schemes. Appl Veg Sci 7:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins A, Pywell RF, Peel S, Johnson RH, Bowling PJ (1999) Enhancement of botanical diversity of permanent grassland and impact on hay production in environmentally sensitive areas in the UK. Grass For Sci 54:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall EJP (2003) Methods to diversify field margin plant communities, BD1607. Marshall Agroecology Ltd., UK. Accessed 25 January 2009
  25. Marshall EJR, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall EJP, Nowakowski M (1991) The use of herbicides in the creation of a herb-rich field margin. Brighton Crop Protection Conference—WeedsGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall EJP, Nowakowski M (1994) The effects of Fluazifop-P-Butyl and cutting treatments on the establishment of sown field margin strips. Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation, British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, Brighton 58, pp 307–312Google Scholar
  28. Marshall EJP, Nowakowski M (1996) Interactions between cutting and graminicide on a newly-sown grass and wild flower field margin strip. Asp Appl Biol 44:307–312Google Scholar
  29. Marshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR, Ward LK (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res 43:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meek B, Loxton D, Sparks T, Pywell R, Pickett H, Nowakowski M (2002) The effect of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity. Biol Conserv 106:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MVSP (1999) Multivariate statistical package version 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, AngleseyGoogle Scholar
  32. Natural England (2009) Agri-environment schemes in England 2009: a review of results and effectivenessGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Connor RJ, Shrubb M (1986) Farming and birds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Ovenden GN, Swash ARH, Smallshire D (1998) Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. J Appl Ecol 35:955–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peel S, Christian M (2009) Sward enhancement: selection of suitable sites. Natural England Technical Information Note TIN061Google Scholar
  36. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollard E, Elias DO, Skelton MJ, Thomas JA (1975) A method of assessing the abundance of butterflies in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve in 1973. Ent Gaz 26:77–88Google Scholar
  38. Porter K, Steel CA, Thomas JA (1992) Butterflies and communities. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Potts GR (1986) The partridge: pesticides, predation and conservation. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Potts SG, Westbury DB, Woodcock BA, Ramsay AJ, Harris SJ, Springate S, Pywell R, Meek B, Carvell C, Hulmes L, Warman L, Sparks T, Cook SK, Henderson IG (2007) Experiment 2—management of the non-cropped margin structure to maximise biodiversityGoogle Scholar
  41. Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR, Carvell C, Petit S, Firbank LG (2004) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Conserv 118:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pywell RF, Warman EA, Carvell C, Sparks TH, Dicks LV, Bennett D, Wright A, Critchley CNR, Sherwood A (2005) Providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. Biol Conserv 121:479–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Tallowin JB, Walker KJ, Warman EA, Masters G (2007) Enhancing diversity of species-poor grasslands: an experimental assessment of multiple constraints. J Appl Ecol 44:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS (2008) Statistical analysis system: version 9.2. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  46. Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ (eds) (2002) Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Stace C (1997) New flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd (2003) Fusilade Max Product Label. Accessed 13 February 2009
  49. Thomas SR, Noordhuis R, Holland JM, Goulson D (2002) Botanical diversity of beetle banks effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Swaay C, Warren M, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Cons 10:189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westbury DB, Dunnett NP (2008) The promotion of grassland forb abundance: a chemical or biological solution? Basic Appl Ecol 9:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Westphal C, Bommarco RGC, Lamborn E, Morison N, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Szentgyörgyi H, Tscheulin T, Vaissière BE, Woyciechowski M, Biesmeijer JC, Kunin WE, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecol Monogr 78:653–671Google Scholar
  53. Williams PH (1982) The distribution and decline of British bumble-bees. J Apic Res 21:236–245Google Scholar
  54. Wilson PJ (1992) Britain’s Arable weeds. Br Wildl 3:149–161Google Scholar
  55. Wilson JD, Morris AJ, Arroyo BE, Clark SC, Bradbury RB (1999) A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 75:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Woodcock BA, Westbury DB, Tscheulin T, Harrison-Cripps J, Harris SJ, Ramsey AJ, Brown VK, Potts SG (2008) Effects of seed mixture and management on beetle assemblages of arable field margins. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin J. Blake
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ben A. Woodcock
    • 2
  • Duncan B. Westbury
    • 1
  • Peter Sutton
    • 3
  • Simon G. Potts
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy & DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReading, BerksUK
  2. 2.NERC Centre for Ecology & HydrologyWallingford, OxonUK
  3. 3.Syngenta, Jealott’s Hill International Research CentreBracknell, BerksUK

Personalised recommendations