Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 523–538 | Cite as

Land-use, environment, and their impact on butterfly populations in a mountainous pastoral landscape: species richness and family-level abundance

  • J. W. Dover
  • A. Rescia
  • S. Fungariño
  • J. Fairburn
  • P. Carey
  • P. Lunt
  • C. Arnot
  • R. L. H. Dennis
  • C. J. Dover
Original Paper

Abstract

Extensive grasslands are considered to be of high biodiversity value, but are under threat from intensification and abandonment. We studied butterfly species richness and abundance in 47 hay and grazing meadows in the Picos de Europa, northern Spain in 2004. Nine transects were walked around the perimeter of the meadows from the 1 June to 28 July with butterflies recorded to species or species-group. Land-use, abiotic, and sward variables were also recorded. Change in meadow extent was estimated by comparing a digital map of open meadows with a cadastral map with 1950s provenance. We found: A decrease in open area, mostly attributable to reduction in grazing meadows. 75 or more butterfly species with species richness principally, and positively, influenced by altitude and presence of scrub in the body of the meadow. Hay meadow management was a positive influence on richness of satyrids. When all butterflies were considered together, the only significant factor influencing abundance was Plantago lanceolata (−ve). For sub-groups of the butterfly community there was no consistent pattern, although P. lanceolata was identified as a (−ve) factor in relation to hesperiid, nymphalid, satyrid, and Viola-feeding fritillary groups. Several regression models included components that could be linked to abiotic influences (water, aspect, altitude) but many were indicative of abandonment or relaxation of management intensity (scrub, Pteridium aquilinum, Asphodelus albus), sward components, fragmentation (distance to nearest meadow, number of meadows within 100 m), and land use (hay management, summer grazing). The results are discussed in relation to changing socio-economics, including the potential impact of tourism, and the need for financial instruments to support extensive farming.

Keywords

Butterfly Land-use Spain Species richness Abundance Tourism Socio-economics Fragmentation Hay Grazing Abandonment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Earthwatch Institute for funding; and to the large number of Earthwatch volunteers, and MSc students from Staffordshire University who helped us with fieldwork; to our employers for allowing us to participate in the research; to Profs Bob Bunce and Francisco Pineda for helping us frame the project; to Fernando Silío of the University of Cantabria for providing digital maps, and to the Picos de Europa National Park and the Government of Cantabria for giving us permission to work in the Park. We thank Dr Tim Sparks for statistical advice. We are indebted to National Park staff for their help and support. We are also grateful for the advice of referees.

References

  1. Álvarez P (2006) Los quesos de Liébana. Gobiernero de Cantabria, SantanderGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2005) Anuario de Estadística Agraria Pesquera Cantabria 2003. Gobiernero de Cantabria, SantanderGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmer O, Erhardt A (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conserv Biol 14:746–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman KO, Askling J, Ekberg O, Ignell H, Wahlman H, Milberg P (2004) Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27:619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergman KO, Ask L, Askling J, Ignell H, Wahlman H, Milberg P (2008) Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors. Biodivers Conserv 17:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bignal EM, McCracken DI (1992) Prospects for nature conservation in European pastoral farming systems: a discussion document. JNCC, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  7. Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Baudry J, Bukacek R, Burel F, Cerny M, De Blust G, De Cock R, Diekoetter T, Dietz H, Dirksen J, Dormann C, Durka W, Frenzel M, Hamersky R, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Koolstra B, Lausch A, Le Coeur D, Maelfait JP, Opdam P, Roubalova M, Schermann A, Schermann N, Schmidt T, Schweiger O, Smulders MJM, Speelmans M, Simova P, Verboom J, van Wingerden WKRE, Zobel M, Edwards PJ (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackstock TH, Rimes CA, Stevens DP, Jefferson RG, Robertson HJ, Mackintosh J, Hopkins JJ (1999) The extent of semi-natural grassland communities in lowland England and Wales: a review of conservation surveys 1978–1996. Grass Forage Sci 54:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandmeyr P, Mingozzi T, Scalercio S, Passalacqua N, Rotondaro F, Pizzolotto R (2002) Stipa austroitalica garigues and mountain pastureland in the Pollino National Park (Calabria, Southern Italy). In: Redecker B, Härdtle W, Finck P, Riecken U, Schröder E (eds) Pasture landscapes and nature conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bueno CG, Alados CL, Gómez-Garcia D, Barrio IC, Garcia-Gonzalez R (2009) Understanding the main factors in the extent and distribution of wild boar rooting on alpine grasslands. J Zool 279:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunce RGH, Bell M, Farino T (1998) The environmentally sensitive area legislation in the United kingdom and its potential application to the Picos de Europa mountains in north-west Spain. Environ Conserv 25:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Elbersen BS, Prados MJ, Andersen E, Bell M, Smeets PJAM (2001a) Introduction. In: Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Elbersen BS, Prados MJ, Andersen E, Bell M, Smeets PJAM (eds) Examples of European agri-environment schemes and livestock systems and their influence on Spanish cultural landscapes. Alterra, Wageningen, pp 9–12Google Scholar
  13. Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Elbersen BS, Prados MJ, Andersen E, Bell M, Smeets PJAM (2001b) Conclusions. In: Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Elbersen BS, Prados MJ, Andersen E, Bell M, Smeets PJAM (eds) Examples of European agri-environment schemes and livestock systems and their influence on Spanish cultural landscapes. Alterra, Wageningen, pp 233–237Google Scholar
  14. Cousins SAO, Ohlson H, Eriksson O (2007) Effects of historical and present fragmentation on plant species diversity in semi-natural grasslands in Swedish rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 22:723–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennis RLH (2010) A resource-based habitat view for conservation. Butterflies in the British landscape. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2006) When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biol Conserv 129:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dover J, Settele J (2008) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J Insect Conserv 13:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dover JW, Rescia A, Fungariño S, Fairburn J, Carey P, Lunt P, Dennis RLH, Dover CJ (2010a) Can hay harvesting detrimentally affect adult butterfly abundance? J Insect Conserv 14:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dover JW, Rescia A, Fungariño S, Fairburn J, Carey P, Lunt P, Arnot C, Dennis RLH, Dover CJ (2010b) Land-use, environment, and their impact on butterfly populations in a mountainous pastoral landscape: individual species distribution and abundance. J Insect Conserv. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9338-7
  20. Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erhardt A, Thomas JM (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 213–236Google Scholar
  22. ESRI (1999) Getting to know ArcView GIS. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Farino T (1999) Flora and fauna of the Picos de Europa. Teresa Farino, PotesGoogle Scholar
  24. García A (1992) Conserving the species-rich meadows of Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gómez AF, López MCI, Suero ÁA, Serna FG (undated) Análysis diagnóstico territorial de la comarca de Liébana. Agencia desarrollo local Liébana, PotesGoogle Scholar
  26. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (2007) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species, 2nd edn. Castlepoint Press, DalbeattieGoogle Scholar
  27. Gutiérrez D (1997) Importance of historical factors on species richness and composition of butterfly assemblages (Lepidoptera:Rhopalocera) in a northern Iberian mountain range. J Biogeogr 24:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamre LN, Domaas ST, Austad I, Rydgren K (2007) Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landsc Ecol 22:1563–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hodgson JG, Grime JP, Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Band SR (2005) The impacts of agricultural change (1963–2003) on the grassland flora of central England: processes and prospects. Basic Appl Ecol 6:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huband S (2008) Landscape-scale conservation of hay meadows by Romanian smallholders. La Cañada 23:7–9Google Scholar
  31. Jefferson RG (2005) The conservation management of upland hay meadows in Britain: a review. Grass Forage Sci 60:322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jubete F, Román J (2005) Los roedores en Cantabria. In: Herrero Á, Bahíllo M (eds) Fauna de Cantabria. Los mamíferos. Cantabria Tradicional, Torrelavega, pp 89–131Google Scholar
  33. Knop E, Kleijn D, Herzog F, Bernhard S (2006) Effectiveness of the Swiss agri- environment scheme in promoting biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 43:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies, and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv Biol 16:1570–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuiper PJC, Bos M (1992) Plantago: a multidisciplinary study. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuussaari M, Heliola J, Luoto M, Pöyry J (2007) Determinants of local species richness of diurnal Lepidoptera in boreal agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lafranchis T (2004) Butterflies of Europe. Diatheo, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Ligtenberg A, Rijswijk JV (1996) Effects of marginalisation in European highlands: analysis of changing land use in Picos de Europa using GIS. Wageningen Agricultural University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  39. MacDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou N, Fleury P, Lazpita JG, Gibon A (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manage 59:47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marini L, Fontana P, Scotton M, Klimek S (2008) Vascular plant and Orthoptera diversity in relation to grassland management and landscape composition in the European Alps. J Appl Ecol 45:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munguira ML (2003) Spain (excluding Canary Islands). In: van Swaay C, Warren M (eds) Prime butterfly areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Wageningen, pp 531–554Google Scholar
  42. Ockinger E, Eriksson AK, Smith HG (2006) Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. Biol Conserv 133:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ouin A, Aviron S, Dover J, Burel F (2004) Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pineda FD (2001) Intensification, rural abandonment and nature conservation in Spain. In: Bunce RGH, Pérez-Soba M, Elbersen BS, Prados MJ, Andersen E, Bell M, Smeets PJAM (eds) Examples of European agri-environment schemes and livestock systems and their influence on Spanish cultural landscapes. Alterra, Wageningen, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  45. Pollard E, Elias DO, Skelton MJ, Thomas JA (1975) A method of assessing the abundance of butterflies in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve in 1973. Entomol Gaz 26:79–88Google Scholar
  46. Poska AM (2000) Gender, property and retirement strategies in early modern northwest Spain. J Fam Hist 25:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pöyry J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2004) Restoration of butterfly and moth communities in semi-natural grasslands by cattle grazing. Ecol Appl 14:1656–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pöyry J, Luoto M, Paukkunen J, Pykälä J, Raatikainen K, Kuussaari M (2006) Different responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient of vegetation height: an indicator of the vertebrate grazing intensity and successional age. Oikos 115:401–412Google Scholar
  49. Prince H (1993) An evaluation of the conservation importance of hay meadows in the Deva Valley, Picos de Europa, Spain and the north-east area of the Lake District National Park, Cumbria, UK. Using inter- and intra-area comparative techniques. Centre for Continuing Education, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-TyneGoogle Scholar
  50. Rescia AJ, Pons A, Lomba I, Esteban C, Dover JW (2008) Reformulating the social-ecological system in a cultural rural mountain landscape in Picos de Europa region (northern Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 88:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saarinen K, Jantunen J (2005) Grassland butterfly fauna under traditional animal husbandry: contrasts in diversity in mown meadows and grazed pastures. Biodivers Conserv 14:3201–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Settele J, Henle K (2003) Grazing and cutting regimes for old grassland in temperate zones, In: Gherardi F, Corti C, Gualtieri M (eds) Biodiversity conservation and habitat management. Encyclopedia of life support systems. EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, chapter E1-67-03-02 (http://www.eolss.net; Internet-version 11 pp)
  53. Sjodin NE, Bengtsson J, Ekbom B (2008) The influence of grazing intensity and landscape composition on the diversity and abundance of flower-visiting insects. J Appl Ecol 45:763–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stefanescu C, Penuelas J, Filella I (2005) Butterflies highlight the conservation value of hay meadows highly threatened by land-use changes in a protected Mediterranean area. Biol Conserv 126:234–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2002) Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation. Appl Veg Sci 5:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas JA (1986) RSNC guide to butterflies of the British Isles. Country Life Books, TwickenhamGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner EC, Granroth HMV, Johnson HR, Lucas CBH, Thompson AM, Froy H, German RN, Holdgate R (2009) Habitat preference and dispersal of the Duke of Burgundy butterfly (Hamearis lucina) on an abandoned chalk quarry in Bedfordshire, UK. J Insect Conserv 13:475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Swaay CAM (2002) The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wallis De Vries MF, Parkinson AE, Dulphy JP, Sayer M, Diana E (2007) Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 4. Effects on animal diversity. Grass Forage Sci 62:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warren MS (1993) A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: II. Site management and habitat selection of key species. Biol Conserv 64:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Dover
    • 1
  • A. Rescia
    • 2
  • S. Fungariño
    • 2
  • J. Fairburn
    • 1
  • P. Carey
    • 3
    • 4
  • P. Lunt
    • 1
    • 5
  • C. Arnot
    • 6
  • R. L. H. Dennis
    • 1
  • C. J. Dover
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environment, Sustainability and RegenerationStaffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  2. 2.Departamento de EcologíaComplutense UniversityMadridSpain
  3. 3.CEH Monks Wood, Abbots RiptonHuntingdonUK
  4. 4.Bodsey Ecology LtdRamseyUK
  5. 5.University of PlymouthPlymouthUK
  6. 6.RPS Group PLCAbingdonUK

Personalised recommendations