Advertisement

Monitoring of butterflies in semi-natural grasslands: diurnal variation and weather effects

  • Linnea Wikström
  • Per Milberg
  • Karl-Olof Bergman
Original Paper

Abstract

The butterfly fauna was monitored in six semi-natural grasslands in southeastern Sweden. The aim was to evaluate monitoring criteria for wind, sunshine, temperature and time of day for butterfly species richness and abundances when using the line transect method. A total of 30,111 butterflies belonging to 46 species were recorded. Data from this study suggests somewhat stricter criteria for temperature and sunshine than stated in the widely used “Pollards walk”. A sharp decline in butterfly numbers were detected at temperatures below 19°C if the proportion of sunshine of the transect walk was below 80–85%. No effect of wind speed, up to five on the Beaufort scale, on observed numbers of species or individuals were found. Several butterfly species showed well-defined diurnal rythms of flight activity, and the results indicated that transect walks can be performed between −4.5 and +4 h from the time when the sun reached its highest point. The results of this study can be used to adjust general criteria in national monitoring and also for detailed regional and local monitoring where it may be important to adjust for diurnal rhythm and weather related bias.

Keywords

Lepidoptera Line transect method Species richness Weather conditions 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We want to thank Jens Johannesson, Carina Greiff, Anders Glimskär, Markus Franzén, Dennis Jonason, Martin Planthaber, Joakim Sandell and Victor Johansson for their help. We also want to thank all the landowners who kindly let us work on their property. Stiftelsen Oscar och Lili Lamms Minne supported this work financially.

References

  1. Balmford A, Crane P, Dobson A, Green RE, Mace GM (2005) The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:221–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benes J, Cizek O, Dovala J, Konvicka M (2006) Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: the story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic. Forest Ecol Manag 237:353–365 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair RB (1999) Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol Appl 9:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis AK, Garland MS (2002) An evaluation of three methods of counting migrating monarch butterflies in varying wind conditions. Southeast Nat 1:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2006) When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use change under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biol Conserv 129:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH, Hardy PB (1999) Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the effect of sampling effort. J Insect Conserv 3:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dover JW, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN (1997) The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. J Insect Conserv 1:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eliasson CU, Ryrholm N, Holmer M, Jilg K, Gärdefors U (2005) Nationalnyckeln till Sveriges flora och fauna. Fjärilar: Dagfjärilar. Hesperiidae—Nymphalidae, ArtDatabanken, SLU, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  9. Erhardt A, Thomas JA (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the seminatural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. 1st edn. Academic Press, London, pp 213–237Google Scholar
  10. Frazer JFD (1973) Estimating butterfly numbers. Biol Conserv 5:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glimskär A, Bergman KO, Claesson K, Sundquist S (2006) Fältinstruktioner för fjärilar, humlor, grova träd och lavar i ängs- och betesmarker NILS 2006. SLU Umeå, version 1.0Google Scholar
  12. Kingsolver JG (1985) Thermal ecology of Pieris butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): a new mechanism of behavioural thermoregulation. Oecologia 66:540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Konvicka M, Novak J, Benes J, Fric Z, Bradley J, Keil P, Hrcek J, Chobot K, Pavel Marhoul P (2007) The last population of the Woodland Brown butterfly (L. achine) in the Czech Republic: habitat use, demography and site management. J Insect Conserv. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9087-4
  14. Maes D, van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meitner CJ, LP Brower, Davis AK (2004) Migration patterns and environmental effects on stopover of Monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) at Peninsula Point Michigan. Environ Entomol 33:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer CL, Sisk TD (2001) Butterfly response to microclimatic conditions following ponderosa pine restoration. Restor Ecol 9:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore NW (1975) Butterfly transect in a linear habitat 1964–1973. Entomologist´s Gazette 26:71–78Google Scholar
  18. New TR (1997a) Butterfly conservation. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  19. New TR (1997b) Are Lepidoptera an effective “umbrella group” for biodiversity conservation? J Insect Conserv 1:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oostermeijer JGB, van Swaay CAM (1998) The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: a tool for conservation in changing landscapes. Biol Conserv 86:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pivnick KA, McNiel JN (1987) Diel patterns of activity of Thymelicus lineola adults (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in relation to weather. Ecol Entomol 12:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conserv 12:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Pullin AS (1995) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR, Carvell C, Firbank LG (2003) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Conserv 118:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rawlins JE (1980) Thermoregulation by the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Ecology 61:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rothery P, Roy DB (2001) Application of generalized additive models to butterfly transect count data. J Appl Stat 28:897–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy DB, Rothery P, Brereton T (2007) Reduced-effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations. J Appl Ecol 44:993–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shreeve TG (1984) Habitat selection, mate location, and microclimatic constraints on the activity of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Oikos 42:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Statsoft Inc. (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system) version 7. http://www.statsoft.com
  31. Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2000) Observations on Lycaeides in the northern midwest, USA (Lepidotera: Lycaenidae). Holarctic Lepidoptera 7:21–31Google Scholar
  32. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for windows: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  33. van Strien AJ, van de Pavert R, Moss D, Yates TJ, van Swaay CAM, Vos P (1997) The statistical power of two butterfly monitoring schemes to detect trends. J Appl Ecol 34:817–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment No. 99, Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  35. van Swaay CAM, Warren MS, Grégoire L (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10:189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A, Svensson B (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warren MS (1992) The conservation of British butterflies. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 246–274Google Scholar
  38. Yamamoto M (1975) Notes on the methods of belt transect census of butterflies. J Faculty Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser 6 Zool 20:93–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linnea Wikström
    • 1
  • Per Milberg
    • 1
  • Karl-Olof Bergman
    • 1
  1. 1.IFM Division of EcologyLinköping UniversityLinkopingSweden

Personalised recommendations