Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 3–27

The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review

Review Paper

Abstract

We review the literature on the influence of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement. We start by examining the definition of landscape commonly used in spatial ecology. Landscape-level processes are reviewed before focusing on the impact of the geometry and spatial arrangement of habitat patches on butterflies e.g. the nature of the matrix, patch size and shape, minimum area requirements, immigration and emigration, and temporal habitat dynamics. The role of landscape elements is reviewed in terms of corridors (and stepping-stones), barriers, nodes, environmental buffers, and prominent landmark features.

Keywords

Landscape Dispersal Connectivity Spatial ecology Lepidoptera Patch Matrix 

References

  1. Adams LW, Geis AD (1983) Effects of roads on small mammals. J Appl Ecol 20:403–415Google Scholar
  2. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247Google Scholar
  3. Alcock J (1987) Leks and hilltopping in insects. J Nat Hist 21:319–328Google Scholar
  4. Anderson P (2002) Roads as barriers. In: Sherwood B, Cutler D, Burton J (eds) Wildlife and roads: the ecological impact. Imperial College Press, London, pp 169–184Google Scholar
  5. Andrén H (1994) Effect of habitat fragmentation on birds and animals with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366Google Scholar
  6. Araujo MB, Thuiller W, Pearson RG (2006) Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J Biogeogr 33:1712–1728Google Scholar
  7. Arnold RA (1983) Ecological studies of six endangered butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae): island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the design of nature reserves. Univ Calif Publ Entomol 99:1–161Google Scholar
  8. Asher J, Warren MS, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Baguette M (2003) Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography 26:153–160Google Scholar
  10. Baguette M, Mennechez G (2004) Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint. Oikos 106:399–403Google Scholar
  11. Baguette M, Mennechez G, Petit S, Schtickzelle N (2003) Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia C.R. Biologies 326:200–209Google Scholar
  12. Baguette M, Petit S, Quéva F (2000) Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. J Appl Ecol 37:100–108Google Scholar
  13. Baker RR (1972) Territorial behaviour of the Nymphalid butterflies, Aglais urticae (L.) and Inachis io (L.). J Anim Ecol 41:453–469Google Scholar
  14. Balletto E (1992) Butterflies in Italy: status, problems and prospects. In: Pavlicek-van Beek T, Ovaa AH, van der Made JG (eds) The future of butterflies in Europe. Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, pp 53–64Google Scholar
  15. Balletto E, Casale A (1991) Mediterranean insect conservation. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 121–142Google Scholar
  16. Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252Google Scholar
  17. Belfrage K, Björklund J, Salominsson L (2005) The effects of farm size and organic farming on diversity of birds, pollinators and plants in a Swedish landscape. Ambio 34:582–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A (2006) Properties of land mosaics: Implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biol Conserv 133:250–264Google Scholar
  19. Bergman KO (2001) Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine. J Appl Ecol 38:1303–1313Google Scholar
  20. Bergman KO, Landin J (2002) Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden. Biol Conserv 108:361–369Google Scholar
  21. Bergman KO, Askling J, Ekberg O, Ignell H, Wahlman H, Milberg P (2004) Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27:619–628Google Scholar
  22. Billeter R, Sedivy I, Diekötter T (2003) Distribution and dispersal patterns of the ringlet butterfly (Aphantopus hyperantus) in an agricultural landscape. Bull Geobot Inst ETH 69:45–55Google Scholar
  23. Binzenhöfer B, Settele J (2000) Vergleichende autökologische Untersuchungen an Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) nausithous Bergstr. und G. (M.) teleius Bergstr. (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) im nördlichen Steigerwald. In: Settele J, Kleinewietfeld S (eds) Populationsökologische Studien an Tagfaltern 2, UFZ-Bericht 2/2000, pp 1–98Google Scholar
  24. Binzenhöfer B, Biedermann R, Settele J, Schröder B (2007). Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Ecol Res (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Bliss P, Kuhn W, Schöpke H, Settele J, Wallaschek M (1996) The hilly landscape of Halle – main study area of the FIFB. In: Settele J, Margules C, Poschlod P, Henle K (eds) Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 161–168Google Scholar
  26. Bos F, Bosveld M, Groenendijk D, Van Swaay C, Wynhoff I, De Vlinderstichting (2006) De Dagvlinders van Nederland, verspreiding en beschreming (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea. – Nederlandse Fauna 7. Leiden. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij & European Invertebrate Survey, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. Bourn NAD, Thomas JA (2002) The challenge of conserving grassland insects at the margins of their range in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:285–292Google Scholar
  28. Burkey TV (1988) Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments. Oikos 55:75–81Google Scholar
  29. Brunzel S, Reich M (1996) Zur Metapopulationsstruktur des Roten Scheckenfalters (Melitaea didyma Esper 1779) auf der Schwäbischen Alb. Z Ökol Nat 5:243–253Google Scholar
  30. Carter CI, Anderson MA (1987) Enhancement of lowland forest ridesides and roadsides to benefit wild plants and butterflies. Forestry Commission, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  31. Cassel A, Windig J, Nylin S, Wiklund C (2001) Effects of population size and food stress on fitness-related characters in the scarce heath, a rare butterfly in Western Europe. Conserv Biol 15:1667–1673Google Scholar
  32. Chardon JP, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2003) Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landsc Ecol 18:561–573Google Scholar
  33. Cizek O, Bakesova A, Kuras T, Benes J, Konvicka M (2003) Vacant niche in alpine habitat: the case of an introduced population of the butterfly Erebia epiphron in the Krkonose Mountains. Acta Oecol 24:15–23Google Scholar
  34. Clausen HD, Holbeck HB, Reddersen J (2001) Factors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark. Biol Conserv 98:167–178Google Scholar
  35. Conradt L, Bodsworth EJ, Roper TJ, Thomas CD (2000) Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:1505–1510Google Scholar
  36. Conradt L, Roper TJ, Thomas CD (2001) Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterfies. Oikos 95:416–424Google Scholar
  37. Courtney SP (1980) Studies on the biology of the butterflies Anthocharis cardamines L. and Pieris napi L. in relation to speciation in Pierinae. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of DurhamGoogle Scholar
  38. Cowley MJR, Thomas CD, Wilson RJ, León-Cortés JL, Gutiérrez D, Bulman CR (2001a) Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. II. An assessment of mechanisms. J Anim Ecol 70:426–441Google Scholar
  39. Cowley MJR, Thomas CD, Roy DB, Wilson RJ, León-Cortés JL, Gutiérrez D, Bulman CR, Quinn RM, Moss D, Gaston KJ (2001b) Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. J Anim Ecol 70:410–425Google Scholar
  40. Creed ER, Dowdeswell WH, Ford EB, McWhirter KG (1970) Evolutionary studies on Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera, Satyridae): the “boundary phenomenon” in southern England, 1961–1968. In: Hecht MK, Steere WC (eds) Essays in evolution and genetics. Appleton Century Crafts, New York, pp 263–287Google Scholar
  41. Davies ZG, Wilson RJ, Brereton TM, Thomas CD (2005) The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story. Biol Conserv 124:189–198Google Scholar
  42. Dawson D (1994) Are habitat corridors conduits for animals and plants in a fragmented landscape? A review of the scientific evidence. English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  43. Debinski DM (1994) Genetic diversity assessment in a metapopulation of the butterfly Euphydryas gilletti. Biol Conserv 70:25–31Google Scholar
  44. Debinski DM, Ray C, Saveraid EH (2001) Species diversity and the scale of the landscape mosaic: do scales of movement and patch size affect diversity? Biol Conserv 98:179–190Google Scholar
  45. Dempster JP, King ML, Lakhani KH (1976) The status of the swallowtail butterfly in Britain. Ecol Ent 1:71–84Google Scholar
  46. Dennis RLH (1982) Patrolling behaviour in orange tip butterflies within the Bollin valley in north Cheshire, and a comparison with other pierids. Vasculum 67:17–25Google Scholar
  47. Dennis RLH (1986) Motorways and cross-movements. An insect’s ‘mental map’ of the M56 in Cheshire. Bull Am Ent Soc 45:228–243Google Scholar
  48. Dennis RLH (1987) Hilltopping as a mate location strategy in a Mediterranean population of Lasiommata megera (L.) (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Nota Lepid 10:65–70Google Scholar
  49. Dennis RLH (1992) An evolutionary history of British butterflies. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 217–245Google Scholar
  50. Dennis RLH (1993) Butterflies and climate change. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  51. Dennis RLH (2004) Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecol Ent 29:744–752Google Scholar
  52. Dennis RLH, Bramley MJ (1985) The influence of man and climate on dispersion patterns within a population of adult Lassiommata megera (L.) (Satyridae) at Brereton Heath, Cheshire. Nota Lepid 8:309–324Google Scholar
  53. Dennis RLH, Eales H (1997) Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J Insect Conserv 1:167–176Google Scholar
  54. Dennis RLH, Eales H (1999) Probability of patch site occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller) (Lepidoptera:Satyrinae) determined from geographical and ecological data. Biol Conserv 87:295–301Google Scholar
  55. Dennis RLH, Hardy PB (2007) Support for mending the matrix: resource seeking by butterflies in non-resource zones. J Insect Conserv 11:157–168Google Scholar
  56. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG (1988) Hostplant-habitat structure and the evolution of butterfly mate-location behaviour. Zool J Linn Soc 94:301–318Google Scholar
  57. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG (1991) Climatic change and the British butterfly fauna: opportunities and constraints. Biol Conserv 55:1–16Google Scholar
  58. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG (1996) Butterflies on British and Irish Offshore Islands. Gem Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG (1997) Diversity of butterfly species on British islands: ecological influences underlying the roles of area, isolation and faunal source. Biol J Linn Soc 60:257–275Google Scholar
  60. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2006) When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biol Conserv 129:291–301Google Scholar
  61. Dennis RLH, Williams WR (1986) Butterfly ‘diversity’. Regressing and a little latitude. Antenna 10:108–112Google Scholar
  62. Dennis RLH, Williams WR (1987) Mate-location behaviour in the butterfly Ochlodes venata (Br. And Grey) (Hesperiidae). Flexible strategies and spatial components. J Lepid Soc 41:45–64Google Scholar
  63. Dennis RLH, Williams WR, Shreeve TG (1998) Faunal structures among European butterflies: evolutionary implications of bias for geography, endemism and taxonomic affiliation. Ecography 21:181–203Google Scholar
  64. Dennis RLH, Donato B, Sparks TH, Pollard E (2000a) Ecological correlates of island incidence and geographical range among British butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 9:343–359Google Scholar
  65. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Olivier A, Coutsis JG (2000b) Contemporary geography dominates butterfly diversity gradients within the Aegean archipelago (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae, Hesperioidea). J Biogeogr 27:1365–1383Google Scholar
  66. Dennis RLH, Olivier A, Coutsis JG, Shreeve TG (2001) Butterflies on islands in the Aegean archipelago: predicting numbers of species and incidence of species using geographical variables. Ent Gaz 52:3–39Google Scholar
  67. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426Google Scholar
  68. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966Google Scholar
  69. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Sheppard DA (2007) Species conservation and landscape management: a habitat perspective. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. Royal Entomological Society, London pp 92–127Google Scholar
  70. Descimon H, Napolitano M (1992) Genetic management of butterfly populations. In: Pavlicek-van Beek T, Ovaa AH, van der Made JG (eds) The future of butterflies in Europe. Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, pp 231–238Google Scholar
  71. Diamond JM (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of nature reserves. Biol Conserv 7:129–145Google Scholar
  72. Dobson A, Jolly A, Rubenstein D (1989) The greenhouse effect and biological diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 4:64–68Google Scholar
  73. Donald PF, Evans AD (2006) Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. J Appl Ecol 43:209–218Google Scholar
  74. Dover JW (1990) Butterflies and wildlife corridors. In: Nodder C (ed) The game conservancy review of 1989. The Game Conservancy, Fordingbridge, pp 62–64Google Scholar
  75. Dover JW (1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 33:723–734Google Scholar
  76. Dover JW (1997) Conservation headlands: effects on butterfly distribution and behaviour. Agric Ecosyst Environ 63:31–49Google Scholar
  77. Dover JW, Fry GLA (2001) Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscape. Ent Exp Appl 100:221–233Google Scholar
  78. Dover JW, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN (1997) The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. J Insect Cons 1:89–97Google Scholar
  79. Dover JW, Butt K, Pearson D (1998) Nodes and linear sections of field boundaries: plant species richness, soil nutrients and boundary width. In: Dover JW, Bunce RGH (eds) Key concepts in landscape ecology. IALE(UK), Preston, pp 347–351Google Scholar
  80. Dover JW, Sparks T, Clarke S, Gobbett K, Glossop S (2000) Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80:227–242Google Scholar
  81. Dowdeswell WH, Fisher RA, Ford EB (1940) The quantitative study of populations in the Lepidoptera. I. Polyommatus icarus Rott. Ann Eugen 10:123–136Google Scholar
  82. Dowdeswell WH, Ford EB, McWhirter KG (1957) Further studies on isolation in the butterfly Maniola jurtina L. Heredity 11:51–65Google Scholar
  83. Dramstad WE, Olson JD, Forman RTT (1996) Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Harvard University Graduate School of Design, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  84. Dunning J, Danielson B, Pulliam H (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex habitats. Oikos 65:169–175Google Scholar
  85. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Ehrlich PR, Davidson SE (1960) Techniques for capture-recapture studies of Lepidoptera populations. J Lepid Soc 14:227–229Google Scholar
  87. Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (2004) On the wings of checkerspots. a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  88. Ehrlich PR, Wheye D (1986) “Nonadaptive” hilltopping behavior in male checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas editha). Am Nat 127:477–483Google Scholar
  89. Enfjäll K, Leimar O (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in the Glanville fritillary, Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 108:465–472Google Scholar
  90. Erhardt A, Thomas JA (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 213–236Google Scholar
  91. Fahrig L, Merriam G (1994) Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 8:50–59Google Scholar
  92. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2000) Methodische Aspekte von Fang-Wiederfangstudien am Beispiel der Feuerfalter Lycaena helle und L. hippothoe. Beiträge zur Ökologie 4:157–172Google Scholar
  93. Fleishman E, Ray C, Sjögren-Gulve P, Boggs CL, Murphy DD (2002) Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv Biol 16:706–716Google Scholar
  94. Forman RTT, Godron M (1981) Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31:733–740Google Scholar
  95. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. Forrester JA, Leopold DJ, Hafner SD (2005) Maintaining critical habitat in a heavily managed landscape: effects of power line corridor management on Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) habitat. Restor Ecol 13:488–498Google Scholar
  97. Frank K (2005) Metapopulation persistence in heterogeneous landscapes: lessons about the effect of stochasticity. Am Nat 165:374–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Franco AMA, Hill JK, Kitchke C, Collingham YC, Roy DB, Fox R, Huntley B, Thomas CD (2006) Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Glob Change Biol 12:1545–1553Google Scholar
  99. Fried JH, Levey DJ, Hogsette JA (2005) Habitat corridors function as both drift fences and movement conduits for dispersing flies. Oecologia 143:645–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Fry GLA (1991) Conservation in agricultural ecosystems. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 415–443Google Scholar
  101. Fry GLA (1994) Quantifying effects of landscape connectivity and permeability on farmland. In: Dover J (ed) Fragmentation in agricultural landscapes. IALE(UK), Preston, pp 121–128cGoogle Scholar
  102. Fry GLA (1995) Landscape ecology of insect movement in arable ecosystems. In: Glen DM, Greaves MP, Anderson HM (eds) Ecology and integrated farming systems. Wiley, Chichester, pp 177–202Google Scholar
  103. Fry GLA, Main AR (1993) Restoring seemingly natural communities on agricultural land. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Ehrlich PR (eds) Nature conservation 3: reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Australia, pp 225–241Google Scholar
  104. Fry GLA, Robson WJ (1994) The effects of field margins on butterfly movement. In: Boatman ND (ed) Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation. BCPC, Fareham, pp 111–116Google Scholar
  105. Game M (1980) Best shape for nature reserves. Nature 287:630–631Google Scholar
  106. Geissler-Strobel S (1999) Landschaftsplanungsorientierte Studien zu Ökologie, Verbreitung, Gefährdung und Schutz der Wiesenknopf-Ameisen-Bläulinge Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) nausithous und Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) teleius. Neue Entomologische Nachrichten (Marktleuthen) 44:1–105Google Scholar
  107. Gilpin M, Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  108. Greatorex-Davies JN, Hall ML, Marrs RH (1992) The conservation of the pearl-bordered fritillary butterfly (Boloria euphrosyne L): preliminary studies on the creation and management of glades in conifer plantations. For Ecol Manage 53:1–14Google Scholar
  109. Gutiérrez D (1997) Importance of historical factors on species richness and composition of butterfly assemblages (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) in a northern Iberian mountain range. J Biogeogr 24:77–88Google Scholar
  110. Gutiérrez D (2005) Effectiveness of existing reserves in the long-term protection of a regionally rare butterfly. Conserv Biol 19:1586–1597Google Scholar
  111. Groombridge B (1992) Global biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  112. Haddad NM (1999a) Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecol Appl 9:612–622Google Scholar
  113. Haddad NM (1999b) Corridor use predicted from behaviours at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:215–227Google Scholar
  114. Haddad NM (2000) Corridor length and patch colonisation by a butterfly, Junonia coenia. Conserv Biol 14:738–745Google Scholar
  115. Haddad NM, Baum KA (1999) An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecol Appl 9:623–633Google Scholar
  116. Hall ML (1981) Butterfly monitoring scheme: instructions for independent recorders. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbots RiptonGoogle Scholar
  117. Hamilton GS, Mather PB, Wilson JC (2006) Habitat heterogeneity influences connectivity in a spatially structured pest population. J Appl Ecol 43:219–226Google Scholar
  118. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  119. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  120. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Hanski I, Simberloff D (1997) The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, London, pp 5–26Google Scholar
  122. Hanski I, Thomas CD (1994) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol Conserv 68:167–180Google Scholar
  123. Hanski I, Alho J, Moilanen A (2000) Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Hanski I, Saastamoinen M. Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Hausdorf B, Hennig C (2005) The influence of recent geography, paleogeography and climate on the composition of the fauna of the central Aegean Islands. Biol J Linn Soc 84:785–795Google Scholar
  126. Heal H (1965) The wood white, Leptidea sinapis L., and the railways. Irish Nat J 15:8–13Google Scholar
  127. Henle K, Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Saunders DA, Wissel C (2004) Species survival in fragmented landscapes: where are we now? Biodivers Conserv 13:1–8Google Scholar
  128. Higgins LG, Riley ND (1970) A field guide to the butterflies of Britain & Europe. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  129. Hill CJ (1995) Linear strips of rain forest vegetation as potential dispersal corridors for rain forest insects. Conserv Biol 9:1559–1566Google Scholar
  130. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT (1996) Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. J Anim Ecol 65:725–735Google Scholar
  131. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Huntley B (1999) Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly’s range margin. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 266:1197–1206Google Scholar
  132. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Fox R, Telfer MG, Willis SG, Asher J, Huntley B (2002) Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:2163–2171Google Scholar
  133. Hobbs RJ (1998) Corridors: theory, practice and the achievement of conservation objectives. In: Dover JW, Bunce RGH (eds) Key concepts in landscape ecology. IALE(UK), Preston, pp 265–279Google Scholar
  134. Hobbs RJ, Saunders DA (1993) Re-integrating fragmented landscapes. Towards sustainable production and nature conservation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  135. Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2006) The control of emigration and its consequences for the survival of populations. Ecol Model 190:443–453Google Scholar
  136. Honegger RE (1982) Threatened amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Akad. Verlagsges, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  137. Ide JY (2002) Mating behaviour and light conditions cause seasonal changes in the dispersal pattern of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana. Ecol Ent 27:33–40Google Scholar
  138. Johannesen J, Veith M, Seitz A (1996) Population genetic structure of the butterfly Melitaea didyma (Nymphalidae) along a northern distribution range border. Mol Ecol 5:259–267Google Scholar
  139. Johannesen J, Schwing U, Seufert W, Seitz A, Veith M (1997) Analysis of gene flow and habitat patch network for Chazara briseis (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) in an agricultural landscape. Biochem Syst Ecol 25:419–427Google Scholar
  140. Johst K, Brandl R, Eber S (2002) Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance. Oikos 98:263–270Google Scholar
  141. Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas JA, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–342Google Scholar
  142. Kapfer A (1993) Biotopschutz am Beispiel der Wiesen und Weiden. Beitr Akad Natur- u Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg 14:15–37Google Scholar
  143. Karlsson B, Wiklund C (2005) Butterfly life history and temperature adaptations; dry open habitats select for increased fecundity and longevity. J Anim Ecol 74:99–104Google Scholar
  144. Kéry M, Matthies D, Fischer M (2001) The effect of plant population size on the interactions between the rare plant Gentiana cruciata and its specialized herbivore Maculinea rebeli. J Ecol 89:418–427Google Scholar
  145. Kindlmann P, Aviron S, Burel F, Ouin A (2004) Can the assumption of a non-random search improve our prediction of butterfly fluxes between resource patches? Ecol Ent 29:447–456Google Scholar
  146. Kindlmann P, Aviron S, Burel F (2005) When is landscape matrix important for determining animal fluxes between resource patches? Ecol Complex 2:150–158Google Scholar
  147. Kindvall O, Petersson A (2000) Consequences of modeling interpatch migration as a function of patch geometry when predicting metapopulation extinction risk. Ecol Model 129:101–109Google Scholar
  148. King C (1984) Immigrant killers. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  149. Kivinen S, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Helenius J (2006) Multi-species richness of boreal agricultural landscapes: effects of climate, biotope, soil and geographical location. J Biogeogr 33:862–875Google Scholar
  150. Kleyer M, Biedermann R, Henle K, Obermaier E, Poethke HJ, Poschlod P, Schröder B, Settele J, Vetterlein D (2007) Mosaic cycles in agricultural landscapes of Northwest Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 8:295–309Google Scholar
  151. Konvička M, Maradova M, Benes J, Fric Z, Kepka P (2003) Uphill shifts in distribution of butterflies in the Czech Republic: effects of changing climate detected on a regional scale. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:403–410Google Scholar
  152. Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? J Biogeogr 30: 889–900Google Scholar
  153. Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol Conserv 120:355–361Google Scholar
  154. Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Műller CB, Tscharntke T (2005). Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly. Ecography 28:465–474Google Scholar
  155. Kudrna O (2002) The distribution atlas of European Butterflies. Apollo Books, StenstrupGoogle Scholar
  156. Kuefler D, Haddad NM (2006) Local versus landscape determinants of butterfly movement behaviors. Ecography 29:549–560Google Scholar
  157. Kuussaari M, Nieminen M, Hanski I (1996) An experimental study of migration in the Glanville Fritillary butterfly, Melitea cinxia. J Appl Ecol 65:791–801Google Scholar
  158. Laine AL (2004) A powdery mildew infection on a shared host plant affects the dynamics of the Glanville Fritillary butterfly populations. Oikos 107:329–337Google Scholar
  159. León-Cortés JL, Lennon JJ, Thomas CD (2003) Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 2. The role of host plant dynamics. Oikos 102:465–477Google Scholar
  160. Levins R (1970) Extinction. In: Gerstenhaber M (ed) Some mathematical questions in biology. Lectures on mathematics in life sciences, vol II. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 77–107Google Scholar
  161. Loritz H, Settele J (2006) Eiablageverhalten des Großen Feuerfalters (Lycaena dispar) in SW-Deutschland – Wirtspflanzenwahl, Generationenvergleich und Hinweise zur Erfassung. In: Fartmann T, Hermann G (eds) Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa. Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde 68(3/4):243–255Google Scholar
  162. Luoto M, Kuussaari M (2002) Modelling butterfly distribution based on remote sensing data. J Biogeogr 29:1027–1037Google Scholar
  163. Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Rita H, Salminen J, von Bonsdorff T (2001) Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded Apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach. Ecography 24:601–617Google Scholar
  164. Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Poyry J, Saarinen K (2006) Determinants of the biogeographical distribution of butterflies in boreal regions. J Biogeogr 33:1764–1778Google Scholar
  165. MacArthur RA, Wilson E (1967) The theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  166. MacClintock L, Whitcomb BL, Whitcomb BL (1977) Island biogeography and habitat islands of eastern forest. II. Evidence for the value of corridors and the minimization of isolation in preservation of biotic diversity. Am Birds 31:6–16Google Scholar
  167. Mader HJ (1984) Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol Conserv 29:81–96Google Scholar
  168. Martin LA, Pullin AS (2004a) Host-plant specialisation and habitat restriction in an endangered insect, Lycaena dispar batavus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) I. Larval feeding and oviposition preferences. Eur J Entomol 101:51–56Google Scholar
  169. Martin LA, Pullin AS (2004b) Host-plant specialisation and habitat restriction in an endangered insect, Lycaena dispar batavus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) II. Larval survival on alternative host plants in the field. Eur J Entomol 101:57–62Google Scholar
  170. Matter SF, Roland J (2002) An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecol Ent 27:308–316Google Scholar
  171. McLaughlin JF, Hellmann JJ, Boggs CL, Ehrlich PR (2002) Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6070–6074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Mennechez G, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. Landsc Ecol 18:279–291Google Scholar
  173. Merckx T, van Dyck H (2002) Interrelations among habitat use, behavior, and flight related morphology in two contrasting satyrine butterflies, Maniola jurtina and Pyronia tithonus. J Insect Behav 15:541–561Google Scholar
  174. Merckx T, van Dyck H (2005) Mate location behaviour of the butterfly Pararge aegeria in woodland and fragmented landscapes. Anim Behav 70:411–416Google Scholar
  175. Morecroft MD, Bealey CE, Howells O, Rennie S, Woiwod IP (2002) Effect of drought on contrasting insect and plant species in the UK in the mid-1990s. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:7–22Google Scholar
  176. Morris MG, Thomas JA, Ward LK, Snazell RG, Pywell RF, Stevenson MJ, Webb NR (1994) Re-creation of early-successional stages for threatened butterflies – an ecological engineering approach. J Env Man 42:119–135Google Scholar
  177. Mousson L, Nève G, Baguette M (1999) Metapopulation structure and conservation of the cranberry fritillary Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) in Belgium. Biol Conserv 87:285–293Google Scholar
  178. Munguira ML, Thomas JA (1992) Use of road verges by butterfly and burnet populations, and the effect of roads on adult dispersal and mortality. J Appl Ecol 29:316–329Google Scholar
  179. Nieminen M, Singer MC, Fortelius W, Schöps K, Hanski I (2001) Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. Am Nat 157:237–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Norberg U, Enfjäll K, Leimar O (2002) Habitat exploration butterflies – an outdoor cage experiment. Evol Ecol 16:1–14Google Scholar
  181. Noss RF, Harris L (1986) Nodes, networks and MUMs: preserving diversity at all scales. Environ Manage 10:299–309Google Scholar
  182. Notaro M, Vavrus S, Liu ZY (2007) Global vegetation and climate change due to future increases in CO2 as projected by a fully coupled model with dynamic vegetation. J Clim 20:70–90Google Scholar
  183. Nowicki P, Richter A, Glinka U, Holzschuh A, Toelke U, Henle K, Woyciechowski M, Settele J (2005a) Less input same output – simplified approach for population size assessment in Lepidoptera. Popl Ecol 47:203–212Google Scholar
  184. Nowicki P, Witek M, Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2005b) Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous, and its implications for conservation. Popl Ecol 47:193–202Google Scholar
  185. Nowicki P, Pępkowska A, Kudłek J, Skórka P, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2007) From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biol Conserv 140:119–129Google Scholar
  186. Öckinger E, Smith HG (2006) Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 149:526–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Öckinger E, Smith HG (2007) Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:50–59Google Scholar
  188. Odendaal FJ, Turchin P, Stermitz FR (1988) An incidental-effect hypothesis explaining aggregation of males in a population of Euphydryas anica. Am Nat 132:735–749Google Scholar
  189. Ouin A, Aviron S, Dover J, Burel F (2004) Complementation/ supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:473–479Google Scholar
  190. Ovaskainen O (2004) Habitat-specific movement parameters estimated using mark-recapture data and a diffusion model. Ecology 85:242–257Google Scholar
  191. Pauler-Fürste R, Kaule G, Settele J (1996) Aspects of the population vulnerability of the large blue butterfly, Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) arion, in south-west Germany. In: Settele J, Margules C, Poschlod P, Henle K (eds) Species Survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 275–281Google Scholar
  192. Pauli H, Gottfried M, Reier K, Klettner C, Grabherr G (2007) Signals of range expansions and contractions of vascular plants in the high Alps: observations (1994–2004) at the GLORIA master site Schrankogel, Tyrol, Austria. Glob Change Biol 13:147–156Google Scholar
  193. Pe’er G, Saltz D, Frank K (2005) Virtual corridors for conservation management. Conserv Biol 19:1997–2003Google Scholar
  194. Petit S, Moilanen A, Hanski I, Baguette M (2001) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92:491–500Google Scholar
  195. Porter K (1981). The population dynamics of small populations of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  196. Pryke SR, Samways MJ (2001) Width of grassland linkages for the conservation of butterflies in South African afforested areas. Biol Conserv 101:85–96Google Scholar
  197. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70:840–852Google Scholar
  199. Riffell SK, Gutzwiller KJ (1996) Plant-species richness in corridor intersections: is intersection shape influential? Landsc Ecol 11:157–168Google Scholar
  200. Ross JA, Matter SF, Roland J (2005) Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landsc Ecol 20:127–135Google Scholar
  201. Rounsevell MDA, Berry PM, Harrison PA (2006) Future environmental change impacts on rural land use and biodiversity: a synthesis of the ACCELERATES project. Environ Sci Policy 9:93–100Google Scholar
  202. Roy DB, Sparks TH (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Glob Change Biol 6:407–416Google Scholar
  203. Rundlöf M, Smith HG (2006) The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context. J Appl Ecol 43:1121–1127Google Scholar
  204. Saccheri IJ, Brakefield PM (2002) Rapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:1073–1078Google Scholar
  205. Samways MJ (2007) Insect conservation: a synthetic management approach. Annu Rev Entomol 52:465–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Schmitt T, Seitz A (2002) Influence of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of Polyommatus coridon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 107:291–297Google Scholar
  207. Schmitt T, Habel JC, Besold J, Becker T, Johnen L, Knolle M, Rzepecki A, Schultze J, Zapp A (2006) The chalk-hill blue Polyommatus coridon (Lycaenidae, Lepidoptera) in a highly fragmented landscape: how sedentary is a sedentary butterfly? J Insect Conserv 10:311–316Google Scholar
  208. Schneider C (2003) The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecol Ent 28:252–256Google Scholar
  209. Schneider C, Fry GLA (2001) The influence of landscape grain size on butterfly diversity in grasslands. J Insect Conserv 5:163–171Google Scholar
  210. Schneider C, Fry G (2005) Estimating the consequences of land-use changes on butterfly diversity in a marginal landscape in Sweden. J Nat Conserv 13:247–256Google Scholar
  211. Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 72: 533–545Google Scholar
  212. Schtickzelle N Mennenchez G, Baguette M (2006) Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87:1057–1065Google Scholar
  213. Schtickzelle N, Joiris A, van Dyke H, Baguette M (2007) Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialised butterfly. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: Art No. 4 Jan 22 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/4
  214. Schweiger O, Dormann CF, Bailey D, Frenzel M (2006) Occurrence pattern of Pararge aegeria (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with respect to habitat suitability, climate and landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 21:989–1001Google Scholar
  215. Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O, Klotz S, Kühn I (2008) Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology (in review)Google Scholar
  216. Settele J (1998) Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis - Möglichkeiten des Modelleinsatzes und der Ergebnisumsetzung im Landschaftsmaßstab am Beispiel von Tagfaltern. Teubner, Stuttgart & LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  217. Settele J, Geissler S (1988) Schutz des vom Aussterben bedrohten Blauschwarzen Moorbläulings durch Brachenerhalt, Grabenpflege und Biotopverbund im Filderraum. Nat Landsch 63:467–470Google Scholar
  218. Settele J, Henle K (2003) Grazing and cutting regimes for old grassland in temperate zones. In: Gherardi F, Corti C, Gualtieri M (eds) Biodiversity conservation and habitat management, encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS; chapter E1-67-03-02), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK. [http://www.eolss.net; Internet-version 11pp.]
  219. Settele J, Margules CR, Poschlod P, Henle K (1996a) Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  220. Settele J, Henle K, Bender C (1996b) Metapopulationen und Biotopverbund: Theorie und Praxis am Beispiel von Schmetterlingen und Reptilien. Z Ökol Naturschutz 5:187–206Google Scholar
  221. Settele J, Hammen V, Hulme P, Karlson U, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kunin W, Marion G, O’Connor M, Petanidou T, Peterson K, Potts S, Pritchard H, Pysek P, Rounsevell M, Spangenberg J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes M, Vighi M, Zobel M, Kühn I (2005) ALARM – Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA 14/1:69–72Google Scholar
  222. Seufert W (1999) PVA-Fallbeispiel 4: Analyse der Gefährdungsursachen mobiler Tiergruppen am Beispiel der Berghexe (Chazara briseis). In: Amler K, Bahl A, Henle K. Kaule G, Poschlod P, Settele J (eds) Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis. Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 180–186Google Scholar
  223. Seufert W, Grosser N (1996) A population ecological study of Chazara briseis (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae). In: Settele J, Margules CR, Poschlod P, Henle K (eds) Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 268–274Google Scholar
  224. Shields O (1967) Hill topping. An ecological study of summit congregation behavior of butterflies on a southern California hill. J Res Lepid 7:191–204Google Scholar
  225. Shreeve T (1981) Flight patterns of butterfly species in woodlands. Oecologia (Berl) 51:289–293Google Scholar
  226. Shreeve TG (1992) Monitoring butterfly movements. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 120–138Google Scholar
  227. Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH (2004) Resources, habitats and metapopulations – whither reality? Oikos 106:404–408Google Scholar
  228. Shreeve T, Dennis RLH, Williams WR (1996) Uniformity of wing spotting of Maniola jurtina (L.) in relation to environmental heterogeneity (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae). Nota Lepid 18:77–92Google Scholar
  229. Simberloff D, Farr JA, Cox J, Mehlman DW (1992) Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments? Conserv Biol 6:493–504Google Scholar
  230. Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2007) Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:319–324Google Scholar
  231. Spangenberg J (2007) Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustain Dev 15:343–356Google Scholar
  232. Sparks TH, Porter K, Greatorex-Davies JN, Hall ML, Marrs RH (1994) The choice of oviposition sites in woodland by the Duke of Burgundy butterfly, Hamearis lucina, in England. Biol Conserv 70:257–264Google Scholar
  233. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2000) Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecol Lett 3:449–456Google Scholar
  234. Summerville KS, Veech JA, Crist TO (2002) Does variation in patch use among butterfly species contribute to nestedness at fine spatial scales. Oikos 97:195–204Google Scholar
  235. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD (1996) Open corridors appear to facilitate dispersal by the ringlet butterfly (Aphantopus hyperantus) between woodland clearings. Conserv Biol 10:1359–1365Google Scholar
  236. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD, Djunijanti P (1997a) Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. Oecologia 109:229–234Google Scholar
  237. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD, Yates TJ, Greatorex-Davies JN (1997b) Correlated extinctions, colonizations and population fluctuations in a highly connected ringlet butterfly metapopulation. Oecologia 109:235–241Google Scholar
  238. Sutcliffe OL, Bakkestuen V, Fry G, Stabbetorp OE (2003) Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. Landsc Urban Plan 63:15–31Google Scholar
  239. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573Google Scholar
  240. Thomas JA (1983) The ecology and conservation of Lysandra bellargus (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 20:59–83Google Scholar
  241. Thomas JA (1984) The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp 333–353Google Scholar
  242. Thomas JA (1986) Butterflies of the British Isles. Country Life Books, TwickenhamGoogle Scholar
  243. Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 149–197Google Scholar
  244. Thomas J (1999) The large blue butterfly – a decade of progress. Br Wildl 11:22–27Google Scholar
  245. Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:139–145Google Scholar
  246. Thomas CD, Harrison S (1992) Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. J Anim Ecol 61:437–446Google Scholar
  247. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ (2005) Contrasting management requirements of Maculinea arion across latitudinal and altitudinal climatic gradients in west Europe. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2: species ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a Model, Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow, pp 240–244Google Scholar
  248. Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:1791–1796Google Scholar
  249. Thomas CD, Wilson RJ, Lewis OT (2002a) Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:563–569Google Scholar
  250. Thomas JA, Snazell RG, Ward LK (2002b) Are roads harmful or potentially beneficial to butterflies and other insects? In: Sherwood B, Cutler D, Burton J (eds) Wildlife and roads: the ecological impact. Imperial College Press, London, pp 203–222Google Scholar
  251. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes. Ecol Appl 12:354–363Google Scholar
  252. Turner JR, Gatehouse CM, Corey CA (1987) Does solar energy control organic diversity? Butterflies, moths and the British climate. Oikos 48:195–205Google Scholar
  253. Valtonen A, Saarinen K (2005) A highway intersection as an alternative habitat for a meadow butterfly: effect of mowing, habitat geometry and roads on the ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus). Ann Zool Fennici 42:545–565Google Scholar
  254. Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M (2004a) Genetic population structure of the vulnerable bog fritillary butterfly. Hereditas 141:199–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  255. Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M (2004b) Demographic versus genetic dispersal measures. Popl Ecol 46:281–285Google Scholar
  256. Vandewoestijne S, Martin T, Liegeois S, Baguette M (2004) Dispersal, landscape occupancy and population structure in the butterfly Melanargia galathea. Basic Appl Ecol 5:581–591Google Scholar
  257. Van Nouhuys S, Hanski I (2002) Colonisation rates and distances of a host butterfly and two specific parasitoids in a fragmented landscape. J Anim Ecol 71:639–650Google Scholar
  258. Veith M, Bahl A, Seitz A (1999) Populationsgenetik im Naturschutz – Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Fallbeispiele. In: Amler K, Bahl A, Henle K, Kaule G, Poschlod P, Settele J (eds) Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis. Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 112–126Google Scholar
  259. Veith M, Johannesen J, Nicklas-Görgen B, Schmeller D, Schwing U, Seitz A (1996) Genetics of insect populations in fragmented landscapes—A comparison of species and habitats. In: Settele J, Margules C, Poschlod P, Henle K (eds) Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 344–355Google Scholar
  260. Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  261. Verspui K, Visser S (1992) Ecological research on a population of the heath fritillary (Mellicta athalia). In: Pavlicek-van Beek T, Ovaa AH, van der Made JG (eds) The future of butterflies in Europe. Agricultural University of Wageningen, Wageningen, pp 172–176Google Scholar
  262. Vogel K (1995) Populationsbiologie und Habitatwahl des Roten Scheckenfalters (Melitaea didyma, Esper, 1779). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 10:357–360Google Scholar
  263. Vogel K, Johannesen J (1996) Research on population viability of Melitaea didyma (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). In: Settele J, Margules CR, Poschlod P, Henle K (eds) Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 262–267Google Scholar
  264. Wahlberg N (2001) On the status of the scarce fritillary Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Finland. Entomologica Fennica 12:244–250Google Scholar
  265. Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I (2002a) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25:224–232Google Scholar
  266. Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Selonen V, Hanski I (2002b) Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130:33–43Google Scholar
  267. WallisDeVries MF (2004) A quantitative conservation approach for the endangered butterfly Maculinea alcon. Conserv Biol 18:489–449Google Scholar
  268. WallisDeVries MF, van Swaay C (2006) Global warming and excess nitrogen may induce butterfly decline by microclimatic cooling. Global Change Biol 12:1620–1626Google Scholar
  269. Wang R, Wang Y, Chen J, Lei GC, Xu R (2004) Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network. Ecol Ent 29:367–374Google Scholar
  270. Warren MS (1987a) The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. II. Adult population structure and mobility. J Appl Ecol 24:483–498Google Scholar
  271. Warren MS (1987b) The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. J Appl Ecol 24:499–513Google Scholar
  272. Warren MS (1992a) Butterfly populations. In: Dennis RLH (eds) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 73–92Google Scholar
  273. Warren MS (1992b) The conservation of British butterflies. In: Dennis RLH (eds) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 246–274Google Scholar
  274. Warren MS (1993a) A review of butterfly conservation in central Southern Britain.1. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites. Biol Conserv 64:25–35Google Scholar
  275. Warren MS (1993b) A review of butterfly conservation in central Southern Britain.2. Site management and habitat selection of key species. Biol Conserv 64:37–49Google Scholar
  276. Warren MS (1994) The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European Butterfly, the Marsh Fritillary Eurodryas aurinia. Biol Conserv 67:239–249Google Scholar
  277. Warren MS, Munguira ML, Ferrin J (1994) Notes on the distribution, habitats and conservation of Eurodryas aurinia (Rottemburg Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Spain. Ent Gaz 45:5–12Google Scholar
  278. Warren M, Brereton T, Wigglesworth T (2005) Do agri-environment schemes help butterflies?: experience from the UK. In: Kühn E, Feldmann R, Thomas JA, Settele J (eds) Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe, Vol 1: General Concepts and Case Studies, pp 121–123Google Scholar
  279. Watkinson AR, Sutherland WJ (1995) Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. J Anim Ecol 64:126–130Google Scholar
  280. Watt WB, Chew FS, Snyder LRG, Watt AG, Rothschild DE (1977) Population structure of Pierid butterflies. I. Numbers and movements of some montane Colias species. Oecologia 27:1–22Google Scholar
  281. Webb NR (1993) Heathland fragmentation and the potential for expansion. In: Haines-Young R (ed) Landscape ecology in Britain. IALE(UK), Preston, pp 49–54Google Scholar
  282. Webb NR (1994) The habitat, the biotope and the landscape. In: Dover JW (ed) Fragmentation in agricultural landscapes. IALE(UK), Preston, pp 21–29Google Scholar
  283. Weibull AC, Bengtsson J, Nohlgren E (2000) Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23:743–750Google Scholar
  284. Weidemann G, Reich M (1995) Auswirkungen von Straßen auf Tiergemeinschaften der Kalkmagerrasen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rotflügeligen Schnarrschrecke (Psophus stridulus) und des Schachbretts (Melanargia galathea) (Saltatoria, Acrididae und Lepidoptera, Satyridae). Beihefte zu den Veröffentlichungen für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege Baden-Württemberg 83:407–424Google Scholar
  285. Weiss SB, Murphy DD, White RR (1988) Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology 69:1486–1496Google Scholar
  286. Wenzel M, Schmitt T, Weitzel M, Seitz A (2006) The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: a conservation problem. Biol Conserv 128:542–552Google Scholar
  287. Wickman PO (1988) Dynamics of mate searching behaviour in a hilltopping butterfly Lasiommata megera (L.). The effects of weather and male density. Zool J Linn Soc 93:357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. Wickman PO, Garcia-Barros E, Rappe-George R (1995) The location of landmark leks in the small heath butterfly Coenonympha pamphilus: evidence against the hot-spot model. Behav Ecol 6:39–45Google Scholar
  289. Wilcove DS, McLellan CH, Dobson AP (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology – the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 237–256Google Scholar
  290. Wissel C, Stephan T, Zaschke SH (1994) Modelling extinction and survival of small populations. In: Remmert H (ed) Minimum viable populations. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–103Google Scholar
  291. With KA (1997) The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 11:1069–1080Google Scholar
  292. Woiwod I, Thomas JA (1993) The ecology of butterflies and moths at the landscape scale. In: Haines-Young R (ed) Landscape Ecology in Britain. IALE(UK), Preston, pp. 76–92Google Scholar
  293. Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape; the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 11:1451–1468Google Scholar
  294. Wood PA, Samways MJ (1991) Landscape element pattern and continuity of butterfly flight paths in an ecologically landscaped botanic garden, Natal, South Africa. Biol Conserv 58:149–166Google Scholar
  295. Wynhoff I (1998) Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous in the Netherlands. J Insect Conserv 2:47–57Google Scholar
  296. Zierl B, Bugmann H (2005) Global change impacts on hydrological processes in Alpine catchments. Water Resour Res 41(2): Art. No. W02028Google Scholar
  297. Zimmerman K, Fric Z, Filipová L, Konvička M (2005) Adult demography, dispersal and behaviour of Brenthis ino (Lepidoptera:Nymphalidae): how to be a successful wetland butterfly. Eur J Entomol 102:699–706Google Scholar
  298. Zschokke S, Dolt C, Rusterholz HP, Oggier P, Braschler B, Thommen GH, Ludin E, Erhardt A, Baur B (2000) Short-term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia 125:559–572Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Environment, Sustainability and RegenerationStaffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  2. 2.Department of Community EcologyUFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations