Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 629–638

The changing status of the Chalkhill Blue butterfly Polyommatus coridon in the UK: the impacts of conservation policies and environmental factors

  • Tom M. Brereton
  • Martin S. Warren
  • David B. Roy
  • Katherine Stewart
Original Paper

Abstract

The Chalkhill Blue Polyommatus coridon is a widespread butterfly of lowland calcareous grassland in southern Britain and is considered a good indicator of habitat condition. Polyommatus coridon has been identified as a Species of Conservation Concern in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan due to a greater than 25% decline in range size since the 1950s, with losses due to the combined effects of habitat destruction, agricultural intensification and neglect. Analysis of annual butterfly monitoring data (transects) collected at 161 sites from 1981 to 2000 show a three-fold population recovery had occurred. The increases were at established sites, with no re-colonisations or range expansion detected. The 1980s population increase coincided with increases across the species range in stock and rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus grazing, as well as greater protection and management of sites through protected areas and nature reserves. During the 1990s agri-environment schemes were thought to be the main conservation and policy mechanism driving the favourable conservation status of P. coridon, by facilitating appropriate habitat restoration and management. Weather played a part in the species recovery, with warm, but wet summers associated with increases in abundance. The research provides strong evidence of an important conservation success with the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, with implications for other specialist biodiversity.

Keywords

Abundance trends Conservation policy Grazing Agri-environment schemes Biodiversity action plans Habitat condition 

References

  1. ADAS (2001) Environmental Monitoring in the Clwydian Range ESA 1994–1998. Report to Welsh Office Agriculture Department, Cardiff, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Aebischer NJ, Green RE, Evans AD (2000) From science to recovery: four case studies of how research has been translated into conservation action in the UK. In: Aebischer NJ, Evans AD, Grice PV, Vickery JA (eds) Ecology and conservation of lowland farmland birds. British Ornithologists Union, Tring, UK, pp 43–54Google Scholar
  3. Aebischer NJ, Potts GR (1998) Spatial changes in grey partridge (Perdix perdix) distribution in relation to 25 years of changing agriculture in Sussex, UK. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:293–308Google Scholar
  4. Alexander KNA (2003) A review of the invertebrates associated with lowland calcareous grassland. English Nature, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Anon (1995) Biodiversity: the UK Steering Group report. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Asher J, Warren MS, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Baines D, Warren P, Calladine J (2002) Spatial and temporal differences in the abundance of black grouse and other moorland birds in relation to reductions in sheep grazing. Asp Appl Biol 67:245–252Google Scholar
  8. Barbaro L, Dutoit T, Cozic P (2001) A six-year experimental restoration of biodiversity by shrub clearing and grazing in calcareous grasslands of the French Prealps. Biodivers Conserv 10:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barr CJ, Bunce RGH, Clarke RT, Fuller RM, Fruse MT, Gillespie MK, Groom GB, Hallam CJ, Hornung M, Howard DC and Ness MJ (1993) Countryside Survey 1990 Main Report. Countryside Survey 1990 Series, Volume 2. DOE, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Beirne BP (1955) Natural fluctuations in the abundance of British Lepidoptera. Entomologist’s Gaz 6:21–52Google Scholar
  11. Bink FA (1992) Ecologische Atlas van de Dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa. Schuyt, Haarem, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourn NA, Thomas JA (1993) The ecology and conservation of the Brown Argus butterfly, Aricia agestis in Britain. Biol Conserv 63:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brereton T, Stewart KS, Warren MS (2002) Developing a system for assessing the effect of agri-environment schemes on butterfly populations. Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Brereton TM (1997) Ecology and conservation of the butterfly Pyrgus malvae, (Grizzled Skipper) in south-east England. PhD. Thesis, University of East London, StratfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Brereton T, Wigglesworth T, Warren MS, Stewart K, (2005) BD1446: Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: re-assessing the impacts and improving delivery of Biodiversity Action Plan targets. Butterfly Conservation Final Project Report, supplied to DefraGoogle Scholar
  16. Butterflies Under Threat Team (BUTT) (1986). The management of chalk downland for butterflies. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowley MJR, Thomas CD, Roy DB (2001) Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. J Anim Ecol 70:410–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies Z, Wilson R, Brereton TM, Thomas CD (2005) The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story. Biol Conserv 124:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dennis RLH (1977) The British butterflies, their origin and establishment. Classey, Faringdon, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. DOE (1995) Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report. HMSO, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis S (2003) Habitat quality and management for the northern brown argus butterfly Aricia artaxerxes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in North East England. Biol Conserv 113(2):285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emmet AM, Heath J (eds) (1989) The Moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 7, part 1. Harley Books, Colchester, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Fearn GM (1973) Biological flora of the British Isles: Hippocrepis comosa L. J Ecol 61:915–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frohawk FW (1924) Natural history of British Butterflies, vol 1. Hutchinson, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuller RJ, Gough SJ (1999) Changes in sheep numbers in Britain: implications for bird populations. Biol Conserv 91:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haines-Young RH, Barr CJ, Black HIJ, Briggs DJ, Bunce RGH, Clarke RT, Cooper A, Dawson FH, Firbank LG, Fuller RM, Furse MT, Gillespie MK, Hill R, Hornung M, Howard DC, McCann T, Morecroft MD, Petit S, Sier ARJ, Smart SM, Smith GM, Stott AP, Stuart RC, Watkins JW (2000). Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. DETR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Heath J, Pollard E, Thomas JA (1984) The atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Viking, Harmondsworth, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Hennenberg KJ, Bruelheide H (2003) Ecological investigations on the northern distribution range of Hippocrepis comosa L. in Germany. Plant Ecol 166:167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hertfordshire County Council (2003) Chalkhill Blue butterfly species action plan. Hertfordshire County Council, Hertford, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Higgins LG, Riley ND (1970) A field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Jefferson R (1999) Species and habitat action plan assessment form––Lowland calcareous grassland. JNCC, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Konvicka MBJ, Cizek O, Kopecek F, Konvicka O, Vitaz L (2007) How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone butterfly from its former stronghold. J Insect Conserv (in press). doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9092-7
  35. Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Müller CB, Tscharntke T (2005) Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly. Ecography 28:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kudrna O (2002) The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Distribution maps of all species. Oedippus 20:1–343Google Scholar
  37. MAFF (1994) Environmentally sensitive area scheme: environmental objectives and performance indicators for ESAs in England. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. MAFF (1999) The countryside Stewardship scheme. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Manley G (1974) Central England temperatures: monthly means 1659 to 1973. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 100:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marren P (2002) Nature conservation: a review of the conservation of wildlife in Britain 1950–2001. Harper Collins, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  41. McLean IFG, Fowles AP, Kerr AJ, Young MR, Yates TJ (1995) Butterflies on nature reserves in Britain. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall in association with Butterfly Conservation, London, UK, pp 67–83Google Scholar
  42. Morris C, Winter M (2002) Barn owls, bumble bees and beetles: UK agriculture, biodiversity and biodiversity action planning. J Environ Plann Manage 45(5):653–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nature Conservancy Council (1984) Nature conservation in Great Britain. NCC, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  44. Nature Conservancy Council (1990) Annual Report 1989/1990. NCC, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  45. Ovenden GN, Swash ARH, Smallshire D (1998) Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. J Appl Ecol 35:955–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pannekoek J and van Strien AJ (1996) TRIM––Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data. Research Paper No. 9634. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg 70:185–198Google Scholar
  47. Peach WJ, Lovett LJ, Wotton SR, Jeffs C (2001) Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK. Biol Conserv 101:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pollard E (1977) A method of assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pollard E (1988) Temperature, rainfall and butterfly numbers. J Appl Ecol 25:819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pollard E, Eversham BC (1994) Butterfly monitoring: interpreting the changes. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall in association with Butterfly Conservation, London, UK, pp 23–36Google Scholar
  51. Pollard E, Hall ML, Bibby TJ (1986) Monitoring the abundance of butterflies 1976–1985. Nature Conservancy Council, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  52. Preston CD, Pearman DA, Dines TD (2002) New atlas of the British and Irish flora. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodwell JS (1992) British plant communities, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Roy DB, Rothery P, Moss D, Pollard E, Thomas JA (2001) Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. J Anim Ecol 70:201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roy DB, Thomas JA (2003) Seasonal variation in the niche, habitat availability and population fluctuations of a bivoltine thermophilous insect near its range margin. Oecologia 134:439–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sazer D (2001) Chalk grassland plants and their insect herbivores: habitat use and fragmentation at range margins. PhD. Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmitt T, Habel JC, Besold J, Becker T, Johnen L, Knolle M, Rzepecki A, Schultze J., Zapp A. (2006) The Chalk-hill Blue Polyommatus coridon (Lycaenidae, Lepidoptera) in a highly fragmented landscape: How sedentary is a sedentary butterfly? J Insect Conserv 10:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. StatSoft Inc. (1996) Statistica for Windows 5.1. Tulsa, USAGoogle Scholar
  59. van Swaay CAM (2002) The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera), nature and environment, No 99. Council of Europe, StrasburgGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas CD (1985) The status and conservation of the butterfly Plebejus argus L. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in North West Britain. Biol Conserv 33:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas CD (1995) The ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in fragmented landscapes. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall in association with Butterfly Conservation, London, UK, pp 46–43Google Scholar
  63. Thomas CD, Bodsworth EJ, Wilson RJ, Simmons AD, Davies ZG, Musche M, Conradt L (2001) Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411:577–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomas JA (1983) The ecology and conservation of Lysandra bellargus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 20:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas JA (1984) The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The biology of butterflies. symposium 11 of the royal entomological society. Academic Press, London, pp 333–353Google Scholar
  66. Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell’s Scientific, Oxford, UK, pp 149–197Google Scholar
  67. Thomas JA, Lewington R (1991) The butterflies of Britain and Ireland. Dorling Kindersley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas JA, Thomas CD, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (1986) Ecology and declining status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 23:365–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM (1997) The soil seedbanks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  70. Trout RC, Ross J, Tittensor AM, Fox AP (1992) The effect on a British wild rabbit population (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of manipulating myxomatosis. J Appl Ecol 29:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trout RC, Smith GC (1995) The reproductive productivity of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in southern England on sites with different soils. J Zool (Lond) 237:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Trout RC, Tapper EC, Harradine J (1986) Recent trends in the rabbit population in Britain. Mamm Rev 16:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. UK BAP Steering Group (1998) UK Biodiversity Group Tranche 2 Action Plans: Volume II––terrestrial and freshwater habitats. English Nature, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  74. Warren MS (1992) The conservation of British butterflies. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 246–274Google Scholar
  75. Warren MS (1993a) A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: I. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites. Biol Conserv 64:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Warren MS (1993b) A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: II. Site management and habitat selection of key species. Biol Conserv 64:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weidemann HJ (1995) Tagfalter Beobachten. Bestimmen Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  78. Wigley TML, Lough JM, Jones PD (1984) Spatial patterns of precipitation in England and Wales and a revised, homogeneous England and Wales precipitation series. J Climatology 4:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom M. Brereton
    • 1
  • Martin S. Warren
    • 1
  • David B. Roy
    • 2
  • Katherine Stewart
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Butterfly ConservationWarehamUK
  2. 2.NERC Centre for Ecology and HydrologyHuntingdonUK
  3. 3.PlantlifeSalisburyUK

Personalised recommendations