Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 539–548 | Cite as

A preliminary study of the Odonata of S’Albufera Natural Park, Mallorca: status, conservation priorities and bio-indicator potential

  • Mayumi Sato
  • Nick Riddiford
Original Paper

Abstract

This study obtained baseline information for adult Odonata and assessed their conservation priorities and suitability as biological indicators in S’Albufera Natural Park in Mallorca, Spain. At this site, human activities in and around the wetland have raised concerns about their impact on the ecosystem. Investigations on adult diversity produced records of 14 species (four Zygoptera and 10 Anisoptera) and included the first record of Erythromma viridulum for the park. Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) ordination categorised study sites according to their geographical locations in the park and showed clustering of the sites around particular species based on these locations. This pattern might reflect the differences in brackishness in water supplied by different water sources. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) indicated that some environmental factors were related to particular species. Water flow, vegetation, and depth and size of a water body could discriminate stenotopic species from eurytopic species. Only a few species appeared to be tolerant to the sites with high salinity and low oxygen concentration. The ordination results can be useful for establishing conservation priorities with information of species diversity, abundance, distribution and flight period. Although, with the current limited basic information, the use of Odonata species as biological indicators seems to be difficult, some clear relationships between environmental factors and particular species indicate the great potential of using adult Odonata as biological indicators in the park.

Keywords

Odonata Species assemblages Environmental factors Indicator species 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Balearic Conselleria de Medi Ambient for permission to study at the site, and the park staff for their warm welcome and support. We also thank Pere Vicens for his help with water sampling, Dr. Richard Furnas for his advice on data analysis, Dr. Jeremy Levitt, Mike Mayer, Dr. Peter Mayhew and two anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript and Mikio Hisamatsu for the provision of literature.

References

  1. Askew RR (1988) The Dragonflies of Europe. Harley Books, Colchester, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown KS Jr (1991) Conservation of insects and their habitats: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 350–404Google Scholar
  3. Bulánková E (1997) Dragonflies (Odonata) as bioindicators of environment quality. Biologia (Bratisl) 52:177–180Google Scholar
  4. Carle FL (1979) Environmental monitoring potential of the Odonata, with a list of rare and endangered Anisoptera of Virginia, United States. Odonatologica 8:319–323Google Scholar
  5. Chapman MS (1996) A study of water quality and aquatic invertebrate communities of s’Albufera, Mallorca in the spring and summer of 1995 Earthwatch Europe S’Albufera Project Report 7: 72–109. Earthwatch Europe, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman MS (1998) A further study of water quality and aquatic invertebrate communities at s’Albufera, Mallorca in the spring, summer and autumn of 1996. Butlletí científic dels Parcs Naturals de les Balears Series 2(1):45–55Google Scholar
  7. Clark TE, Samways MJ (1996) Dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of biotope quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. J Appl Ecol 33:1001–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Compte Sart A (1963) Revision de los Odonatos de Baleares. Publ Inst Biol Appl 25:33–81Google Scholar
  9. Conrad KF, Willson KH, Whitfield K, Harvey IF, Thomas CJ, Sherratt TN (2002) Characteristics of dispersing Ischnura elegans and Coenagrion puella (Odonata): age, sex size, morph and ectoparasitism. Ecography 25:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gauch HG Jr (1982) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Grillas P (1996) Identification of indicators. In: Vives PT (ed) Monitoring mediterranean wetlands: a methodological guide, Wetlands international, Slimbridge, pp 350–404Google Scholar
  12. Hawking JH, New TR (1999) The distribution patterns of dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) along the Kiewa River, Australia, and their relevance in conservation assessment. Hydrobiologia 392:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodkinson ID, Jackson JK (2005) Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environ Manage 35:649–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol Appl 2:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landres PB, Verner J, Thomas JW (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv Biol 2:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maleque MA, Ishii HT, Maeto K (2006) The use of arthropods as indicators of ecosystem integrity in forest management. J Forestry 104:113–117Google Scholar
  17. Michiels NK, Dhondt AA (1991) Characteristics of dispersal in sexually mature dragonflies. Ecol Entomol 16:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osada M, Tabata S (1992) Creation of natural ecosystem on the waterside space through inhabitant environment of dragonflies – a case of Honmoku Public Park in Yokohama City, Japan. Tech Bull Fac Hort Chiba Univ 46:35–46Google Scholar
  20. Osborn R (2005) Odonata as indicators of habitat quality at Lakes in Louisiana, United States. Odonatologica 34:259–270Google Scholar
  21. Osborn R, Samways MJ (1996) Determinants of adult dragonfly assemblage patterns at new ponds in South Africa. Odonatologica 25:49–58Google Scholar
  22. Palmer MW (1993) Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riddiford N (1991) Project S’Albufera: a new model for environmental research. Earthwatch Europe, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Riddiford N, Mayol J (1997) The Odonata of the Parc Natural de S’Albufera. The Earthwatch Europe S’Albufera Project Report 8. Earthwatch Europe, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Riddiford N (2003) Catàleg de Biodiversitat del Parc Natural de S’Albufera de Mallorca [Biodiversity Catalogue of the Albufera de Mallorca Natural Park]. Inventaris tècnics de biodiversitat, 3. Conselleria de Medi Ambient,Govern Balear, Palma de Mallorca, SpainGoogle Scholar
  26. Sahlén G, Ekestubbe K (2001) Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodiv Conserv 10:673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Samways MJ (1995) Insect conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmidt E (1985) Habitat inventarization, characterization and bioindication by a “representative spectrum of Odonata species (RSO)”. Odonatologica 14:127–133Google Scholar
  29. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1994) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Solimini AG, Tarallo GA, Carchini G (1997) Life history and species composition of the damselfly assemblage along the urban tract of a river in central Italy. Hydrobiologia 356:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stewart DAB, Samways MJ (1998) Conserving dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages relative to river dynamics in an African savannah game reserve. Conserv Biol 12:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steytler NS, Samways MJ (1995) Biotope selection by adult male dragonflies (Odonata) at an artificial lake created for insect conservation in South Africa. Biol Conserv 72:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suhling F, Sahlen G, Martens A, Marais E, Schutte C (2006) Dragonfly assemblages in arid tropical environments: a case study from Western Namibia. Biodiversity Conserv 15:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ter Braak CJF (1990) Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  35. ter Braak CJF (1995) Ordination. In: Jongman RJG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (eds) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 91–158Google Scholar
  36. ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res 18:271–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  38. Veraart J (1999) Selection of bio-indicators to monitor effects of agriculture and tourist developments on water quality and aquatic biodiversity in s’Albufera Natural Park, Mallorca. M.Sc. thesis. Wageningen University, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson JAL, Arthington AH, Conrick DL (1982) Effect of sewage effluent on dragonflies (Odonata) of Bulimba Creek, Brisbane. Aust J Marine Freshw Res 33:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wildermuth H (1994) Dragonflies and nature conservation: an analysis of the current situation in central Europe. Adv Odonatol 6:199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Center for Ecological ResearchKyoto UniversityOtsuJapan
  3. 3.The Albufera International Biodiversity GroupSchoolton, Fair Isle, ShetlandUK

Personalised recommendations