The use of ants and other soil and litter arthropods as bio-indicators of the impacts of rainforest clearing and subsequent land use
- 691 Downloads
The present study investigated the impacts of rainforest clearance, and associated subsequent land␣use for pasture, on assemblages of soil and litter arthropods in eastern subtropical Australia. We assessed the utility of soil and litter arthropods as potential bio-indicators of cleared and forested habitats. Arthropods were sampled from 24 sites (12 sites each in rainforest and pasture) using two methods (extraction from litter, pitfall traps). Responses of taxa were analysed at various levels of taxonomic resolution, including ‘coarse’ arthropods (all arthropods sorted to Order/Class), ant genera and ant species. Multivariate analyses of arthropod composition indicated that an increase in the level of taxonomic resolution did not provide a commensurate increase in the sensitivity of assemblage response. Indicator values (IndVals), computed for each taxon, showed that a number of arthropod taxa may have potential as bio-indicators of habitat change. However the use of many of these, especially many ant species found in our study, may be unreliable because even after extensive numbers of sites were sampled, most species showed patchy distributions. To overcome this problem, we generated ‘composite indices’, by combining information from sets of indicator taxa. The utility of these composite indices is discussed.
KeywordsEpigeic invertebrate Forest clearance Functional group Queensland Taxonomic sufficiency
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study would not have been possible without the generous support of the people from Maleny. We are also grateful to Barung Landcare, Alan Andersen, Bill McDonald, Scott Piper, Heather Proctor and Cas Vanderwoude for assistance and advice. Thanks also to our volunteer workers for field and laboratory assistance. We thank anonymous reviewers who improved this manuscript. This research was supported by the Queensland Government’s Growing the Smart State program.
- Adam P (1992) Australian Rainforest. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Alonso LE (2000) Ants as indicators of diverstiy. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 80–88Google Scholar
- Andersen AN (2000) The Ants of Northern Australia: a guide to the monsoonal fauna. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Andersen AN, Majer JD (2004) Ants show the way Down Under: invertebrates as bioindicators in land management. Front Ecol Environ 2:291–298Google Scholar
- Aoki J, Harada H (1982) Environmental change and soil fauna in east Kalimantan (Borneo). Bull Inst Environ Sci Technol, Yokohama National University 8:341–378Google Scholar
- Ghilarov MS (1977) Why so many species and so many individuals can coexist in the soil. Ecol Bull 25:593–597Google Scholar
- Greenslade P, New TR (1991) Australia: conservation of a continental insect fauna. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 33–70Google Scholar
- Gubby C (1994) Campbellville and Cedar Days: a compiled history of the former south-east Queensland sawmilling township of Campbellville and pioneers of the associated timber industry during the latter part of the 19th century. Department of Primary Industries, The State of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
- Kitching RL (1993) Towards rapid biodiversity assessment— lessons following studies of arthropods of rainforest canopies. In: Rapid Biodiversity Assessment. Proceedings of␣the␣Biodiversity Assessment Workshop Macquarie University—1993. Research Unit for Biodiversity and Bioresources, Sydney, pp26–30Google Scholar
- Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Science 403:853–858Google Scholar
- Petal J (1978) The role of ants in ecosystems. In: Brian MV (eds) Production ecology of ants and termites, vol 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 293–325Google Scholar
- Reichle DE (1977) The role of soil invertebrates in nutrient cycling. Ecol Bull 25:145–156Google Scholar
- Roback PJ, Askins RA (2005) Judicious use of multiple hypothesis tests. Conserv Biol 19:261–267Google Scholar
- Sakaino M, Harada H, Bae TW (2002) An index of naturalness based on soil animal communities of environmental protection forests. Eco-habitat 9:119–127Google Scholar
- Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2002) Global Challenge Global Opportunity: Trends in Sustainable Development. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs for the World Summit on Sustainable Development, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
- Veech JA, Crist TO, Summerville KS (2003) Intraspecific aggregation decreases local species diversity of arthropods. Ecology 84:3376–3383Google Scholar
- Watt AD, Stork NE, Eggleton P, Diane S, Bolton B, Larsen TB, Brendell MJD, Bignell DE (1997) Impact of forest loss and regeneration on insect abundance and diversity. In: Watt AD, Stork NE, Hunter MD (eds) Forests and insects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 273–286Google Scholar