Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 151–156 | Cite as

Increasing abundance and diversity in the moth assemblage of east Loch Lomondside, Scotland over a 35 year period

  • Nabeil K. G. Salama
  • John T. Knowler
  • Colin E. Adams


Macro-moths caught in a Rothamsted trap, operating from 1968 to 2003 as part of the Rothamsted Insect Survey, were used to investigate the long-term population trends of moth populations on East Loch Lomondside. In total 367 species of macro moth were recorded during this study. Over the 35 years of this study, an increase was recorded in both the overall number of individuals and moth diversity. Mean annual temperature significantly predicted the change in moth diversity but not number of individuals caught. Four of the most consistently abundant species, collectively constituting 27% of the average annual catch, were subjected to more detailed analysis. The three species that emerge during the summer months Eulithis populata (the northern spinach), Hydriomena furcata (july highflier) and Idaea biselata (the small fan-footed wave) became more abundant throughout the study period, (although for the latter species not significantly so). For Eulithis populata and Idaea biselata their emergence time became earlier, over the study period and in Eulithis populata and Hydriomena furcata, the flight duration also became longer. In contrast, the species that emerges as an adult during autumn and winter, Epirrita dilutata (the november moth) did not exhibit a significant change in abundance, emergence date or flight duration in this study. The results suggest that climate change is at least in part, responsible for the observed changes in species dynamics.


Dynamics Habitat stability Global warming 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millennium atlas of butterflies in Great Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, Butterfield J, Buse A, Coulson JC, Farrar J, Good JEG, Harrington R, Hartley S, Jones TH, Lindroth RL, Press MC, Symrnioudis I, Watt AD, Whittaker JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob Chan Biol 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conrad KF, Perry JN, Woiwod IP (2001) An abundance-occupancy time-lag during the decline of an Arctiid tiger moth. Ecol Lett 4:300–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrad KF, Woiwod IP, Parsons M, Fox R, Warren MS (2004) Long-term population trends in widespread British moths. J␣Insect Cons 8:119–136Google Scholar
  5. Conrad KF, Woiwod IP, Perry JN (2002) Long-term decline in abundance and distribution of the garden tiger moth (Arctica caja) in Great Britain. Biol Cons 106:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox R, Conrad KF, Parsons MS, Warren MS, Woiwod IP (2006) The state of Britain’s larger moths. Butterfly Conservation and Rothamsted Research, Wareham, DorsetGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Huntley B (1999) Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly’s range margin. Proc Roy Soc B 266:1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luff ML, Woiwod IP (1995) Insects as indicators of land use change: a European perspective, focusing on moths and ground beetles. In: Harrington R, Stork NE (eds) Insects in a changing environment. Academic Press, London, pp 399–422Google Scholar
  9. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitchell J (2001) Loch Lomondside. New naturalist. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Morecroft MD, Bealey CE, Howells O, Rennie S, Woiwod IP (2002) Effects of drought on contrasting insect and plant species in the UK in the mid 1990s. Glob Ecol Biogeog 11:7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perry M, Hollis D (2005a) The development of a new set of long-term climate averages for the UK. Int J Climat 25:1023–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Perry M, Hollis D (2005b) The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK. Int J Climat 25:1041–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylor LR, Kempton RA, Woiwod IP (1976) Diversity indices and the log-series model. J Anim Ecol 45:255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD (2001) Rapid response of British butterflies to opposing␣forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Williams CB (1948) The Rothamsted light trap. Proc Roy Ent Soc Lond A 23:80–85Google Scholar
  17. Woiwod IP, Harrington R (1994) Flying in the face of change: the Rothamsted Insect Survey. In: Leigh RA, Johnston AE (eds) Long-term experiments in agricultural and ecological sciences. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 321–342Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nabeil K. G. Salama
    • 1
  • John T. Knowler
    • 1
  • Colin E. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Scottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biomedical & Life SciencesUniversity of GlasgowRowardennan, GlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations