Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 189–209 | Cite as

Biotope Use and Trends of European Butterflies

Article

Abstract

Europe has undergone substantial biotope loss and change over the last century and data are needed urgently on the rate of decline in different wildlife groups in order to identify and target conservation measures. However, pan-European data are available for very few taxonomic groups, notably birds. We present here the first overview of trends for an insect group within different biotopes across Europe, based on data from the Red Data Book of European Butterflies. The most important biotopes for Europe’s 576 butterfly species, including threatened species, are man-made or man-influenced, notably types of grassland or heath/scrub communities. Our results show that butterflies are declining substantially across Europe, with a decline in distribution of −11% over the last 25 years. The distributions of the 25 most “generalist” species are declining only slowly (−1%) compared to specialist butterflies of grassland (−19%), wetlands (−15%), and forests (−14%). On average, grassland butterflies have declined somewhat slower than farmland birds (annual decrease −0.8% compared to −1.5%), but woodland butterflies have decreased more rapidly (−0.01% to −0.6%) than woodland birds, which are more or less stable. The sensitivity of butterflies to environmental changes and the availability of data across Europe suggest that they are very good candidates to build biodiversity indicators and, along with other major groups such as birds, suitable to monitor progress towards the EU target of halting biodiversity loss by 2010.

Keywords

Biodiversity Biotope Butterflies Conservation Europe Generalists Indicator Specialists Threats 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldock, D., Beaufoy, G., Clark, J. 1994The Nature of Farming – Low Intensity Farming Systems in Nine European CountriesInstitute for European Environmental PolicyLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Benes, J., Konvicka, M., Dvorak, J., Fric, Z., Havelda, Z., Pavlicko, A., Vrabec, V., Weidenhoffer, Z. 2002Motýli Ceské republiky: rozsírení a ochrana [Butterflies of the Czech Republic: distribution and conservation]SOMPrahaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman, K.-O. 2001Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for the conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achineJ. Appl. Ecol.3813031313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delbaere, B.C.W. eds. 1998Facts and Figures on Europe’s Biodiversity: State and Trends 1998–1999European Centre for Nature ConervationTilburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennis, R.L.H. 1993Butterflies and Climate ChangeManchester University PressManchester/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Donald, P.F., Green, R.E., Heath, M.F. 2001Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populationsProc. Roy. Soc. B.2682529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EEA2004Environment Signals 2004EEACopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  8. European Communities2004EU Environment Related IndicatorsDG Environment, European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory, R.D., Strien, A., Vorisek, P., Gmelig Meyling, A.W., Noble, D.G., Foppen, R.P.B., Gibbons, D.W. 2005Developing indicators for European birdsPhil. Trans. R. Soc. B.360269288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heath, J. 1980Threatened Rhopalocera (butterflies) in EuropeNature and Environment Series 23Council of EuropeGoogle Scholar
  11. Horlyck, V., Loïs, G. 2005OLI28 – “Biodiversity Index” Draft factsheetEuropean Topic Centre on Nature Protection and BiodiversityParisGoogle Scholar
  12. IUCN1994Red List CategoriesIUCNGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Karsholt, O., Razowski, J. 1996The Lepidoptera of Europe: A Distributional ChecklistApollo BooksStenstrup, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  14. Konvicka, M., Fric, Z., Benes, J. 2006Butterfly extinctions in European states: do socioeconomic conditions matter more than physical geographyGlob. Ecol. Biogeogr.158292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maes, D., Dyck, H. 2001Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario?Biol. Conserv.99263276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moss, D., Wyatt, B., Cornaert, M.H., Roekaerts, M. 1991CORINE Biotopes: the design, compilation and use of an inventory of sites of major importance for nature conservation in the European CommunityOffice for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesLuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  17. Poole A., Pienkowski M., McCracken D.I., Petretti F., Brédy C. and Deffeyes C. 1998. Mountain livestock farming and EU Policy Development. Proceedings of the fifth European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pasturalism 1996, Valle d’AostaItaly. EFNCP, Scotland.Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, C.D., Abery, J.C.G. 1995Estimating rates of butterfly decline from distribution maps: the effect of scaleBiol. Conserv.735965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas, J.A. 1994Why small cold-blooded insects pose different conservation problems to birds in modern landscapesIbis137112119Google Scholar
  20. Thomas, J.A. 2005Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groupsPhil. Trans. R. Soc. B360339357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas, J.A., Telfer, M.G., Roy, D.B., Preston, C., Greenwood, J.J.D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R.T., Lawton, J.H. 2004Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisisScience30318791881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tucker, G.M., Heath, M.F. 1994Birds in Europe: Their Conservation StatusBirdlife Conservation Series no. 3CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Swaay, C.A.M., Warren, M.S. 1999Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera)Nature and Environment No. 99, Council of Europe PublishingStrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  24. Swaay, C.A.M., Warren, M.S. 2003Prime Butterfly Areas in Europe: Priority Sites for ConservationNational Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature and FisheriesWageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Warren, M.S., Barnett, L.K., Gibbons, D.W., Avery, M.I. 1997Assessing national conservation priorities: an improved red list of British butterfliesBiol. Conserv.82317328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Warren, M.S., Key, R.S. 1991

    Woodlands: pastpresent and potential for insects

    Collins, N.M.Thomas, J.A. eds. The Conservation of Insects and Their HabitatsAcademic PressLondon155211
    Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, R.J., Guttieriez, D., Guttieriez, J., Martinez, D., Agudo, R., Monserrat, V.J. 2005Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species’ ranges associated with climate changeEcol. Lett.811381146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris van Swaay
    • 1
    • 4
  • Martin Warren
    • 2
    • 4
  • Grégoire Loïs
    • 3
  1. 1.Dutch Butterfly ConservationWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Butterfly ConservationDorsetUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturellecedex 05France
  4. 4.Butterfly Conservation Europe (BCE)Wageningen

Personalised recommendations