Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 261–268 | Cite as

An appraisal of simple tree-mounted shelters for non-lethal monitoring of weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae and Rhaphidophoridae) in New Zealand nature reserves

  • Mike H. Bowie
  • Simon Hodge
  • Jonathan C. Banks
  • Cor J. Vink
Article

Abstract

When monitoring rare insect species, or when surveying faunas within nature reserves, it is desirable not to use indiscriminate lethal sampling techniques. In this investigation we assessed the usefulness of simple tree-mounted wooden shelters to monitor endemic weta (Orthoptera) in nature reserves in Canterbury, New Zealand. Fifty shelters were placed out at six sites and examined at three-monthly intervals for a year. A wide variety of invertebrates were found utilizing the shelters, with Arachnida, Blattodea and Collembola being the most common occupants. After three months over 80% of the shelters exhibited signs of use by invertebrates, increasing to 96% after 12 months. Only seven tree weta (Anostostomatidae) and one (dead) ground weta (Hemiandrus sp.) were observed in the shelters over the full 12 month period. There were 52 observations of cave weta (Rhaphidophoridae) in the shelters, 36 of which occurred at one site, Orton Bradley Park. Occupation of the shelters by cave weta was not affected by soil conditions, light intensity or aspect of the shelter. However, cave weta exhibited a preference for shelters less than 50 cm above the ground and for shelters attached to kanuka and vines. Although weta were found in only a small proportion (9%) of the shelters, this method proved useful in confirming the presence of weta without risk of harming vulnerable populations. These shelters are inexpensive and easy to manufacture and have potential for long-term non-lethal monitoring of weta and as a collection/carriage device for live specimens used in conservation translocations.

Keywords

New Zealand Non-lethal monitoring Restoration Shelters Weta 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, J.A. 2003Garden havens for pollinatorsThe American GardenerSept./Oct.3539Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous 2005. http://www.doc.govt.nz/Conservation/001~ Plants-and-Animals/001~Native-Animals/Invertebrates/Weta. asp, New Zealand Department of Conservation (assess date 2 August 2005).Google Scholar
  3. Ausden, M. 1996

    Invertebrates

    Sutherland, J. eds. Ecological Census TechniquesCambridge University PressCambridge139177
    Google Scholar
  4. Basset, Y., Arthington, A.H. 1992The arthropod community of an Australian rainforest tree: abundance of component taxa, species richness and guild structureAust. J. Ecol.178998Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, A.F., Lumsden, L.F., Nicholls, A.O. 1994Tree hollows as a resource for wildlife in remnant woodlands: spatial and temporal patterns across the northern plains of Victoria, AustraliaPac. Conserv. Biol.1222235Google Scholar
  6. Bowie, M.H., Marris, J.W.M., Emberson, R.M., Andrew, I.G., Berry, J.A., Vink, C.J., White, E.G., Stufkins, M.A.W., Oliver, E.H.A., Early, J.W., Klimaszewski, J., Johns, P.M., Wratten, S.D., Mahlfeld, K., Brown, B., Eyles, A.C., Pawson, S.M., Macfarlane, R.P. 2003A terrestrial invertebrate inventory of Quail Island (Otamahua): towards the restoration of the invertebrate communityN. Z. Nat. Sci.2881109Google Scholar
  7. Bowie, M.H., Frampton, C.M. 2004A practical technique for non-destructive monitoring of soil surface invertebrates for ecological restoration programmesEcol. Manage. Restoration53442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, S.J. 1993Review of a method to monitor adult dragonfly populationsJ. Brit. Dragonfly Soc.914Google Scholar
  9. Butcher, M.R., Emberson, R.M. 1981Aspects of the biology of carabid beetles of Ahuriri Bush Scenic Reserve, Banks PeninsulaMauri Ora95970Google Scholar
  10. Cole, L.C. 1946A study of the cryptozoa of an Illinois woodlandEcol. Monogr.164986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbs , G. 1994The demon grasshoppersN. Z. Geogr.2190117Google Scholar
  12. Field, L.H., Sandlant, G.R. 2001

    The gallery-related ecology of New Zealand tree wetas, Hemideina femorataHemideina crassidens (OrthopteraAnostostomatidae)

    Field, L.H. eds. The Biology of Wetas, King Crickets and their AlliesCABI PublishingWallingford, UK243257
    Google Scholar
  13. Forster, R.R., Wilton, C.L. 1973The Spiders of New Zealand. Part IVOtago Museum Bulletin.41309Google Scholar
  14. Hodge, S., Frampton, C., Marris, J.W.M., Keesing, V.F., Vink, C.J. 2001The trophic structure of the arthropod assemblage on kawakawaa New Zealand understorey treeEntomologists Monthly Mag.137173178Google Scholar
  15. Hodge, S, Standen , V. 2006The use of ‘cryptozoa boards’ to examine the distribution of woodlice (Isopoda) and illipedes (Diplopoda) in a disused limestone quarryEntomologists Monthly Mag.1425561Google Scholar
  16. Holehouse, K.A., Hammond, R.L., Bourke, A.F.G 2003Non-lethal sampling of DNA from bumble bees for conservation geneticsInsect. Sociaux50277285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jamieson, I.G., Forbes, M.R., McKnight, E.B. 2000Mark-recapture study mountain stone weta Hemideina maori (Orthoptera: Anostomatidae) on rock for ‘islands’N. Z. J. Ecol.24209214Google Scholar
  18. Joyce, S.J., Jamieson, I.G., Barker, R. 2004Survival of adult mountain stone Hemideina maori (Orthoptera : Anostostomatidae) along an altitude gradient as determined by mark-recaptureN. Z. J. Ecol.285561Google Scholar
  19. Keesing, V., Wratten, S.D. 1998Indigenous invertebrate components in ecological restoration in agricultural landscapesN. Z. J. Ecol.2299104Google Scholar
  20. Kelly G.C. 1972. Scenic Reserves of Canterbury. Biological Survey of Reserves. Report 2. Department of Lands and Survey.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, C.D. 2005Allometry and sexual selection of male weaponry in Wellington tree wetaHemideina crassidensBehav. Ecol.16145152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lushai, G., Fjellsted, W., Marcovitch, O., Aagaard, K., Sherratt, T.N., Allen, J.A., Maclean, N. 2000Application of molecular techniques to non-lethal tissue samples of endangered butterfly populations (Parnassiuss apollo L.) in Norway for conservation managementBiol. Conserv.944350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann, D. 2002Ladybirds: Natural Pest ControlOxfordOsmia Publications38Google Scholar
  24. McGeoch, M.A. 1998The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicatorsBiol. Rev.73181201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ordish, R.G. 1992Aggregation and communication of the Wellington weta Hemideina crassidens (Blanchard) (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae)N. Z. Entomologist1517Google Scholar
  26. Pollard, E. 1991

    Monitoring butterfly numbers

    Goldsmith, F.B. eds. Monitoring for Conservation and EcologyChapman and HallLondon87111
    Google Scholar
  27. Ranius, T. 2002Influence of stand size and quality of tree hollows on saproxylic beetles in SwedenBiol. Conserv.1038591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ranius, T., Nilsson, S.G. 1997Habitat of Osmoderma eremite Scop. (Voleoptera: Scarabaeidae), a beetle living in hollow treesJ. Insect Cons.1193204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rufaut, C.G., Gibbs, G.W. 2003Response of a tree weta population (Hemideina crassidens) after eradication of the Polynesian rat from a New Zealand islandRestoration Ecol.111319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Samways M.J. 2005. Insect Diversity Conservation. Cambridge University Press. pp. 342.Google Scholar
  31. Sherley, G.H. 1998Threatened Weta Recovery Plan. Threatened Species Recovery Plan no. 25Department of ConservationWellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  32. Sherley, G. 2001

    Conservation of threatened species of weta (Orthoptera: Anastostomatidae) in New Zealand

    Field, L.H. eds. The Biology of Wetas, King Crickets and their AlliesCABI PublishingWallingford, UK243257
    Google Scholar
  33. Southwood, T.R.E., Wint, G.R.W., Kennedy, C.E.J., Greenwood, S.R. 1978Ecological Methods: With Particular References to the Study on Insect PopulationsWileyLondon524Google Scholar
  34. Southwood, T.R.E., Wint, G.R.W., Kennedy, C.E.J., Greenwood, S.R. 2005The composition of the arthropod fauna of the canopies of some species of oaks (Quercus)Eur. J. Entomol.1026572Google Scholar
  35. Spear, J.R. 2004Minimum-impact researchConserv. Biol.18861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spurr, E.B., Berben, P.H. 2004Assessment of non-target impact of 1080-poisoning for vertebrate pest control on weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae and Rhaphidophoridae) and other invertebrates in artificial refugesN. Z. J. Ecol.286372Google Scholar
  37. Spurr, E.B., Drew, K.W. 1999Invertebrates feeding on baits used for vertebrate pest control in New ZealandN. Z. J. Ecol.23167173Google Scholar
  38. Townsend, J.A., Brown, B., Stringer, I.A.N., Potter, M.A. 1997Distribution, habitat and conservation status of Hemideina rictaH. femorata on Banks PeninsulaNew ZealandN. Z. J. Ecol.214349Google Scholar
  39. Trewick, S.A., Morgan-Richards, M. 2000Artificial weta roosts: A technique for ecological study and population monitoring of Tree Weta (Hemideina) and other invertebratesN. Z. J. Ecol.24201208Google Scholar
  40. Ward, J. B., Macfarlane, R.P., Quinn, P.J., Morris, S.J., Hitchings, T.R., Green, E.H., Early, J.W., Emberson, R.M., Fenwick, G.D., Henderson, I.M., Henderson, R., Johns, P.M., Larivière, M.-C., Marris, J.W.M., Matile, L., McLellan, I.D., Patrick, B.H., Smithers, C., Stufkens, M.A.W., Vink, C.J., Wilson, H.D. 1999Insects and other arthropods of Hinewai ReserveBanks PeninsulaNew ZealandRecords Canterbury Museum1397121Google Scholar
  41. Ward, D.F., Laviere, M.-C. 2004Terrestrial invertebrate surveys and rapid biodiversity assessment in New Zealand: lessons from AustraliaN. Z. J. Ecol.28151159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike H. Bowie
    • 1
  • Simon Hodge
    • 2
  • Jonathan C. Banks
    • 3
  • Cor J. Vink
    • 4
  1. 1.Bio-Protection and Ecology DivisionLincoln UniversityNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural SciencesImperial College LondonWyeUK
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyUniversity of IllinoisIllinoisUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations