Lesion durability after antral pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency hot balloon catheter

Abstract

Purpose

Antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a radiofrequency hot balloon catheter (RHB) is a feasible therapeutic option for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Lesion durability after antral RHB-PVI remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate lesion durability and the associations between procedural characteristics after antral RHB-PVI.

Methods

A total of 200 patients received antral RHB-PVI using the single-shot technique between April 2016 and March 2018. Antral RHB-PVI was performed following a pre-specified protocol and RHB energy application was performed for a maximum of two times for each PV. Consecutive patients who underwent repeated procedures for recurrence of any type of atrial tachyarrhythmia were enrolled.

Results

Twenty-six (13%) patients underwent repeated ablation and 20 patient documented AF recurrence (AF group) and 6 patients documented non-AF recurrence (non-AF group). Repeated ablation was performed at a median (25th, 75th percentiles) of 378 days (217, 487) after the initial procedure and durable PVI was observed in 86 (83.5%) PVs. Durability reached 89.7% when PVI was achieved only using an RHB. In the AF group (79 PVs), durable PVI was observed in 62 (78.5%) PVs, whereas all 24 PVs were still isolated in the non-AF group. The majority of reconnection sites were around the superior PVs.

Conclusions

Antral RHB-PVI shows high lesion durability, especially with both inferior PVs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Reddy VY, Sediva L, Petru J, Skoda J, Chovanec M, Chitovova Z, et al. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation: results from the Sustained PV Isolation with Arctic Front Advance (SUPIR) study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Kautzner J, Petru J, Wichterle D, Skoda J, et al. The durability of pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon catheter: multicenter results of pulmonary vein remapping studies. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:919–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.01.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sohara H, Ohe T, Okumura K, Naito S, Hirao K, Shoda M, et al. HotBalloon ablation of the pulmonary veins for paroxysmal AF: a multicenter randomized trial in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2747–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yamasaki H, Aonuma K, Shinoda Y, Komatsu Y, Masuda K, Hashimoto N, et al. Initial result of antrum pulmonary vein isolation using the radiofrequency hot-balloon catheter with single shot technique. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5:354–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2019.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kiuchi K, Kircher S, Watanabe N, Gaspar T, Rolf S, Arya A, et al. Quantitative analysis of isolation area and rhythm outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation using the pace-and-ablate technique. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:667–75. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.969923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dukkipati SR, Cuoco F, Kutinsky I, Aryana A, Bahnson TD, Lakkireddy D, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1350–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aryana A, Mugnai G, Singh SM, Pujara DK, de Asmundis C, Singh SK, et al. Procedural and biophysical indicators of durable pulmonary vein isolation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:424–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, Nakamura H, Takagi T, Hirao K, et al. Clinical recurrence and electrical pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1852–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Aryana A, Singh SM, Mugnai G, de Asmundis C, Kowalski M, Pujara DK, et al. Pulmonary vein reconnection following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: results of a multicenter analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47:341–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0172-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sohara H, Takeda H, Ueno H, Oda T, Satake S. Feasibility of the radiofrequency hot balloon catheter for isolation of the posterior left atrium and pulmonary veins for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:225–32. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.108.817205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yamasaki H, Adachi T, Komatsu Y, Kuroki K, Sekiguchi Y, Nogami A, et al. Unexpected electrical isolation of the superior vena cava during radiofrequency hot balloon ablation in the right superior pulmonary vein. Circ J. 2017;81:763–5. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Reddy VY, Neuzil P, d’Avila A, Laragy M, Malchano ZJ, Kralovec S, et al. Balloon catheter ablation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: what is the level of pulmonary vein isolation? Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Metzner A, Wissner E, Lin T, Ouyang F, Kuck KH. Balloon devices for atrial fibrillation therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015;4:58–61. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2015.4.1.58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nagashima K, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Nakahara S, Hori Y, Iso K, et al. Hot balloon versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: lesion characteristics and middle-term outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e005861. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nakahara S, Hori Y, Fukuda R, Nishiyama N, Kobayashi S, Sakai Y, et al. Characterization of residual conduction gaps after hotballoon-based antral ablation of atrial fibrillation - evidence from ultra-high-resolution 3-dimensional mapping. Circ J. 2019;83:1206–13. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1051.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Heeger CH, Rexha E, Maack S, Rottner L, Fink T, Mathew S, et al. Reconduction after second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation - impact of different ablation strategies. Circ J. 2020;84:902–10. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Heeger CH, Wissner E, Mathew S, Deiss S, Lemes C, Rillig A, et al. Once isolated, always isolated? Incidence and characteristics of pulmonary vein reconduction after second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1088–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Evonich RF, Nori DM, Haines DE. Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with a novel hot balloon ablation catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9646-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ellen Knapp, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiro Yamasaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Yamasaki received a consultant fee from Toray Industries, Inc. and Dr. Aonuma belongs to the endowed Department of Toray Industries, Inc. Dr. Nogami and Dr. Igarashi belong to the endowed Department of Medtronic Japan. Dr. Sekiguchi belongs to the endowed Department of Abbott Japan.

Ethics approval

Tsukuba Clinical Research & Development Organization (H29-307).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamasaki, H., Aonuma, K., Shinoda, Y. et al. Lesion durability after antral pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency hot balloon catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00857-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Antral pulmonary vein isolation
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Durability
  • Radiofrequency hot balloon ablation
  • Reconnection site