Abstract
Purpose
Antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a radiofrequency hot balloon catheter (RHB) is a feasible therapeutic option for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Lesion durability after antral RHB-PVI remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate lesion durability and the associations between procedural characteristics after antral RHB-PVI.
Methods
A total of 200 patients received antral RHB-PVI using the single-shot technique between April 2016 and March 2018. Antral RHB-PVI was performed following a pre-specified protocol and RHB energy application was performed for a maximum of two times for each PV. Consecutive patients who underwent repeated procedures for recurrence of any type of atrial tachyarrhythmia were enrolled.
Results
Twenty-six (13%) patients underwent repeated ablation and 20 patient documented AF recurrence (AF group) and 6 patients documented non-AF recurrence (non-AF group). Repeated ablation was performed at a median (25th, 75th percentiles) of 378 days (217, 487) after the initial procedure and durable PVI was observed in 86 (83.5%) PVs. Durability reached 89.7% when PVI was achieved only using an RHB. In the AF group (79 PVs), durable PVI was observed in 62 (78.5%) PVs, whereas all 24 PVs were still isolated in the non-AF group. The majority of reconnection sites were around the superior PVs.
Conclusions
Antral RHB-PVI shows high lesion durability, especially with both inferior PVs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.





References
- 1.
Reddy VY, Sediva L, Petru J, Skoda J, Chovanec M, Chitovova Z, et al. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation: results from the Sustained PV Isolation with Arctic Front Advance (SUPIR) study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12626.
- 2.
Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Kautzner J, Petru J, Wichterle D, Skoda J, et al. The durability of pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon catheter: multicenter results of pulmonary vein remapping studies. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:919–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.01.019.
- 3.
Sohara H, Ohe T, Okumura K, Naito S, Hirao K, Shoda M, et al. HotBalloon ablation of the pulmonary veins for paroxysmal AF: a multicenter randomized trial in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2747–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.037.
- 4.
Yamasaki H, Aonuma K, Shinoda Y, Komatsu Y, Masuda K, Hashimoto N, et al. Initial result of antrum pulmonary vein isolation using the radiofrequency hot-balloon catheter with single shot technique. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5:354–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2019.01.017.
- 5.
Kiuchi K, Kircher S, Watanabe N, Gaspar T, Rolf S, Arya A, et al. Quantitative analysis of isolation area and rhythm outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation using the pace-and-ablate technique. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:667–75. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.969923.
- 6.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.
- 7.
Dukkipati SR, Cuoco F, Kutinsky I, Aryana A, Bahnson TD, Lakkireddy D, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1350–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.036.
- 8.
Aryana A, Mugnai G, Singh SM, Pujara DK, de Asmundis C, Singh SK, et al. Procedural and biophysical indicators of durable pulmonary vein isolation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:424–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.033.
- 9.
Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, Nakamura H, Takagi T, Hirao K, et al. Clinical recurrence and electrical pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1852–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.025.
- 10.
Aryana A, Singh SM, Mugnai G, de Asmundis C, Kowalski M, Pujara DK, et al. Pulmonary vein reconnection following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: results of a multicenter analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47:341–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0172-z.
- 11.
Sohara H, Takeda H, Ueno H, Oda T, Satake S. Feasibility of the radiofrequency hot balloon catheter for isolation of the posterior left atrium and pulmonary veins for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:225–32. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.108.817205.
- 12.
Yamasaki H, Adachi T, Komatsu Y, Kuroki K, Sekiguchi Y, Nogami A, et al. Unexpected electrical isolation of the superior vena cava during radiofrequency hot balloon ablation in the right superior pulmonary vein. Circ J. 2017;81:763–5. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1055.
- 13.
Reddy VY, Neuzil P, d’Avila A, Laragy M, Malchano ZJ, Kralovec S, et al. Balloon catheter ablation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: what is the level of pulmonary vein isolation? Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.11.006.
- 14.
Metzner A, Wissner E, Lin T, Ouyang F, Kuck KH. Balloon devices for atrial fibrillation therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015;4:58–61. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2015.4.1.58.
- 15.
Nagashima K, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Nakahara S, Hori Y, Iso K, et al. Hot balloon versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: lesion characteristics and middle-term outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e005861. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005861.
- 16.
Nakahara S, Hori Y, Fukuda R, Nishiyama N, Kobayashi S, Sakai Y, et al. Characterization of residual conduction gaps after hotballoon-based antral ablation of atrial fibrillation - evidence from ultra-high-resolution 3-dimensional mapping. Circ J. 2019;83:1206–13. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1051.
- 17.
Heeger CH, Rexha E, Maack S, Rottner L, Fink T, Mathew S, et al. Reconduction after second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation - impact of different ablation strategies. Circ J. 2020;84:902–10. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1144.
- 18.
Heeger CH, Wissner E, Mathew S, Deiss S, Lemes C, Rillig A, et al. Once isolated, always isolated? Incidence and characteristics of pulmonary vein reconduction after second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1088–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003007.
- 19.
Evonich RF, Nori DM, Haines DE. Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with a novel hot balloon ablation catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9646-1.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ellen Knapp, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Yamasaki received a consultant fee from Toray Industries, Inc. and Dr. Aonuma belongs to the endowed Department of Toray Industries, Inc. Dr. Nogami and Dr. Igarashi belong to the endowed Department of Medtronic Japan. Dr. Sekiguchi belongs to the endowed Department of Abbott Japan.
Ethics approval
Tsukuba Clinical Research & Development Organization (H29-307).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamasaki, H., Aonuma, K., Shinoda, Y. et al. Lesion durability after antral pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency hot balloon catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00857-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
- Antral pulmonary vein isolation
- Atrial fibrillation
- Durability
- Radiofrequency hot balloon ablation
- Reconnection site