Advertisement

Characterization of atrial flutter after pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon ablation

  • Jayson R. Baman
  • Rachel M. Kaplan
  • Celso L. Diaz
  • Graham Peigh
  • Aakash A. Bavishi
  • Amar Trivedi
  • Jeremiah Wasserlauf
  • Alexandru B. Chicos
  • Rishi Arora
  • Susan Kim
  • Albert Lin
  • Nishant Verma
  • Bradley P. Knight
  • Rod S. PassmanEmail author
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has emerged as a commonly used technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. We sought to explore the incidence, risk factors for, and characterization of post-CBA-PVI atrial flutter.

Methods

We analyzed a prospective registry of patients who underwent CBA-PVI at a single institution. We included patients with more than 3 months of follow-up data and excluded those with a history of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. Locations of post-CBA-PVI atrial flutters were determined by analysis of intracardiac electrograms and electroanatomic maps.

Results

There were 556 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 61.0 ± 10.6 years, 67.4% were male, the number of failed anti-arrhythmic medication trials was 1.2 ± 0.8, and the duration of atrial fibrillation pre-CBA was 54.3 ± 69.1 months. The 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon was used almost exclusively. Over a median follow-up time of 22.7 ± 17.9 months, 25 (4.5%) patients developed post-CBA-PVI atrial flutter after the 3-month blanking period. Of those 25 patients, 15 (60%) underwent subsequent ablation to eliminate the atrial flutter circuit, with 60% being CTI-dependent and the remainder left-sided (p value not significant). Risk factors for the development of atrial flutter included NYHA class ≥ 2 (OR 5.02, p < 0.001), presence of baseline bundle branch block (OR 4.33, p = 0.006), and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% (OR 3.36, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The rate of post-CBA-PVI atrial flutter is low after the blanking period even with medium-term follow-up. The origin of atrial flutter is equally divided between the right and left atria.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Atrial flutter Pulmonary vein isolation Cryoballoon Ablation 

Notes

Author contributions

JRBConcept/design, data analysis/interpretation, drafting article.

RKConcept/design, critical revision of article.

CLD, GP, AABData collection, critical revision of article.

AT, JW, ABC, RA, SK, AL, NVData acquisition, approval of article.

BPKConcept/design, critical revision of article.

RSPConcept/design, data analysis/interpretation, drafting article, critical revision of article.

Compliance with ethical standards

The institutional review board at Northwestern University approved the study protocol.

Conflict of interest

Bradley P. Knight receives honoraria for consulting and speaking for Medtronic Inc. Rod S. Passman receives research support, consulting fees, and speaker fees from Medtronic; royalties from UpToDate; and research support from Pfizer and Kardia. Northwestern University receives fellowship support from Medtronic, Inc.

References

  1. 1.
    Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akerstrom F, Bastani H, Insulander P, Schwieler J, Arias MA, Jensen-Urstad M. Comparison of regular atrial tachycardia incidence after circumferential radiofrequency versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in real-life practice. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(9):948–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wasserlauf J, Pelchovitz DJ, Rhyner J, Verma N, Bohn M, Li Z, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol : PACE. 2015;38(4):483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Straube F, Dorwarth U, Ammar-Busch S, Peter T, Noelker G, Massa T, et al. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2016;18(3):368–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee G, Sanders P, Kalman JM. Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art. Lancet (London, England). 2012;380(9852):1509–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coutino HE, de Asmundis C, Mugnai G, Moran D, De Regibus V, Stroker E, et al. Repeat procedures after second-generation cryoballoon ablation as an index procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation: one-year follow-up. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47(3):365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    East C, Phan T, Filardo G, Franklin J, Donsky A, Wheelan KR, et al. Repeat ablation and hospitalization following cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation at a single tertiary medical center. Proceedings. 2017;30(1):3–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikhaylov EN, Bhagwandien R, Janse PA, Theuns DA, Szili-Torok T. Regular atrial tachycardias developing after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: incidence, characteristics, and predictors. Europace. 2013;15(12):1710–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cardoso R, Mendirichaga R, Fernandes G, Healy C, Lambrakos LK, Viles-Gonzalez JF, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(10):1151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermida A, Kubala M, Traulle S, Buiciuc O, Quenum S, Hermida JS. Prevalence and predictive factors of left atrial tachycardia occurring after second-generation cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(1):46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deo R, Berger R. The clinical utility of entrainment pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(4):466–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pedrinazzi C, Durin O, Mascioli G, Curnis A, Raddino R, Inama G, et al. Atrial flutter: from ECG to electroanatomical 3D mapping. Heart Int. 2006;2(3–4):161.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cosio FG. Atrial flutter, typical and atypical: a review. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2017;6(2):55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medi C, Kalman JM. Prediction of the atrial flutter circuit location from the surface electrocardiogram. Europace. 2008;10(7):786–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerstenfeld EP, Dixit S, Bala R, Callans DJ, Lin D, Sauer W, et al. Surface electrocardiogram characteristics of atrial tachycardias occurring after pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(9):1136–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steinberg JS, Romanov A, Musat D, Preminger M, Bayramova S, Artyomenko S, et al. Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: the PReVENT AF Study I. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1567–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mesquita J, Ferreira AM, Cavaco D, Carmo P, Madeira M, Freitas P, et al. Impact of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial fibrillation recurrence after a first pulmonary vein isolation procedure. Int J Cardiol. 2018;259:82–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nery PB, Belliveau D, Nair GM, Bernick J, Redpath CJ, Szczotka A, et al. Relationship between pulmonary vein reconnection and atrial fibrillation recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(4):474–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rahman F, Wang N, Yin X, Ellinor PT, Lubitz SA, LeLorier PA, et al. Atrial flutter: clinical risk factors and adverse outcomes in the Framingham Heart Study. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(1):233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Da Costa A, Mourot S, Romeyer-Bouchard C, Thevenin J, Samuel B, Kihel A, et al. Anatomic and electrophysiological differences between chronic and paroxysmal forms of common atrial flutter and comparison with controls. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol: PACE. 2004;27(9):1202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Medi C, Teh AW, Roberts-Thomson K, Morton JB, Kistler PM, Kalman JM. Right atrial remodeling is more advanced in patients with atrial flutter than with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(10):1067–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nattel S, Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Cardin S, Pelletier P. Mechanisms of atrial remodeling and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005;20(1):21–5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Talman V, Ruskoaho H. Cardiac fibrosis in myocardial infarction-from repair and remodeling to regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;365(3):563–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manolis AS. Contemporary diagnosis and management of atrial flutter: a continuum of atrial fibrillation and vice versa? Cardiol Rev. 2017;25(6):289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayson R. Baman
    • 1
  • Rachel M. Kaplan
    • 1
  • Celso L. Diaz
    • 1
  • Graham Peigh
    • 1
  • Aakash A. Bavishi
    • 1
  • Amar Trivedi
    • 1
  • Jeremiah Wasserlauf
    • 1
  • Alexandru B. Chicos
    • 1
  • Rishi Arora
  • Susan Kim
    • 1
  • Albert Lin
    • 1
  • Nishant Verma
    • 1
  • Bradley P. Knight
    • 1
  • Rod S. Passman
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Memorial HospitalNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations