Focal atrial tachycardia ablation: Highly successful with conventional mapping
- 96 Downloads
Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) traditionally is guided by conventional endocardial mapping of earliest atrial activation; however, more recently electro-anatomical mapping is heralded as a more effective, albeit more expensive, tool to guide ablation. Herein we present the results of conventional mapping-guided RFCA. Apropos, we conducted a literature search of studies reporting > 10 FAT patients submitted to RFCA.
Methods and results
Conventional mapping-guided RFCA, performed in 63 FAT patients (aged 42.4 + 17.3 years; 14 with incessant tachycardia and 12 with tachycardiomyopathy (TCM)), was successful in 61 (96.8%) patients, applied for single foci in 59 (93.7%) and two foci in 4 patients, right (n = 46) or left sided (n = 17). The earliest atrial activation time at the ablation site was 41.3 ± 16.2 ms. Fluoroscopy time averaged 27.3 + 18.7 min, and procedure lasted 2.6 + 1.7 h. Complications occurred in two patients (sinus pauses in one needing a pacemaker and a large inguinal hematoma in one). Over 29.0 + 22.9 months, four patients (6.5%) had recurrences, of whom three were successfully re-ablated. All patients with TCM showed gradual improvement to normalization over 4–6 months. Literature search showed that RFCA success is equally high when guided with either conventional (88.5%) or electro-anatomical mapping (90%) with similar recurrences (9.6% vs. 9.5%).
Conventional mapping-guided RFCA of FAT had high success (96.8%) with low complication (3.2%) and recurrence rates (6.5%). TCM was fully reversible. These results are comparable to those achieved with the more expensive electro-anatomical mapping, which may be reserved for more complex cases or for those failing the conventional approach.
KeywordsRadiofrequency catheter ablation Focal atrial tachycardia Supraventricular tachycardia Conventional mapping Endocardial activation Electro-anatomical mapping Tachycardiomyopathy Heart failure
Focal atrial tachycardia
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Radiofrequency catheter ablation
Compliance with ethical standards
All patients or patients’ parents gave informed written consent for the procedures.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 32.Hayashi K, Mathew S, Heeger CH, Maurer T, Lemes C, Riedl J, et al. Pace mapping for the identification of focal atrial tachycardia origin: a novel technique to map and ablate difficult-to-induce and nonsustained focal atrial tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9.Google Scholar
- 33.Delacretaz E, Soejima K, Gottipaty VK, Brunckhorst CB, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG. Single catheter determination of local electrogram prematurity using simultaneous unipolar and bipolar recordings to replace the surface ECG as a timing reference. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Saoudi N, Cosio F, Waldo A, Chen SA, Iesaka Y, Lesh M, et al. A classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiological mechanisms and anatomical bases; a statement from a Joint Expert Group from The Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1162–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Wang YL, Li XB, Quan X, Ma JX, Zhang P, Xu Y, et al. Focal atrial tachycardia originating from the left atrial appendage: electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characterization and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:459–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar