Advertisement

The low specificity of low voltage bridges associating atrioventricular nodal reentry in pediatric patients

  • Amanda M. Marshall
  • Christopher C. Erickson
  • David A. Danford
  • John D. Kugler
  • Vincent C. ThomasEmail author
Article
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) often are managed successfully by ablation of the slow pathway with success rates reported as high as 99%. Low voltage bridges (LVBs) have been demonstrated to be helpful in guiding AVNRT ablation. Patients may present to the electrophysiology lab without evidence of inducible arrhythmia. In these scenarios, the demonstration of LVBs may be diagnostic and guide catheter ablation treatment. The purpose of our study was to prospectively investigate the specificity of LVBs as a diagnostic marker of AVNRT.

Methods

Patients aged < 19 years with narrow complex tachycardia prospectively underwent electrophysiology study with intention to perform catheter ablation. In each patient, the primary objective was the collection of right atrial voltage data that was then used to identify LVBs.

Results

Twenty-four patients were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Final diagnosis was 11 AVNRT and 13 non-AVNRT (nAVNRT). LVBs were identified in 11/11 AVNRT patients and 9/13 non-AVNRT patients (p = 0.09).

Conclusions

LVBs are not specific to patients with AVNRT and cannot solely be used for diagnosis. However, in patients with documented AVNRT, the LVB can be used to identify the location of the slow pathway.

Keywords

AVNRT Low voltage bridges Slow pathway Pediatric 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank St. Jude Medical/Abbott for their generous donation of catheters to complete this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, et al. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:313–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Nagamoto Y, Miyamoto K, Sadamatsu K, Tanioka Y, et al. Anatomical and electrophysiological variations of Koch’s triangle and the impact on the slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a study using 3D mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013;37:111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pandozi C, Ficili S, Galeazzi M, Lavalle C, Russo M, Pandozi A, et al. Propagation of the sinus impulse into the Koch triangle and localization, timing, and origin of the multicomponent potentials recorded in this area. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:225–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mani BC, Pavri BB. Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways physiology: a review of relevant anatomy, electrophysiology, and electrocardiographic manifestations. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2014;14:12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bailin SJ, Korthas MA, Weers NJ, Hoffman CJ. Direct visualization of the slow pathway using voltage gradient mapping: a novel approach for successful ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Europace. 2011;13:1188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drago F, Battipaglia I, Russo MS, Remoli R, Pazzano V, Grifoni G, Allegretti G and Silvetti MS. Voltage gradient mapping and electrophysiologically guided cryoablation in children with AVNRT. Europace. 2018;20(4):665-672.  https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux021
  7. 7.
    Malloy L, Law IH, Von Bergen NH. Voltage mapping for slow-pathway visualization and ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in pediatric and young adult patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35:103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bearl DW, Mill L, Kugler JD, Prusmack JL, Erickson CC. Visualization of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia slow pathways using voltage mapping for pediatric catheter ablation. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10:E172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reddy CD, Ceresnak SR, Motonaga KS, Avasarala K, Feller C, Trela A, et al. Bridge to success: a better method of cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1649–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kannankeril PJ, Fish FA. Sustained slow pathway conduction: superior to dual atrioventricular node physiology in young patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Critical CareArkansas Children’s HospitalLittle RockUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pediatric CardiologyUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center/Children’s Hospital & Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations