Atrial mapping during pulmonary vein pacing to detect conduction gaps in a second pulmonary vein isolation procedure
- 198 Downloads
Finding the conduction gaps in redo PV isolation procedures is challenging, and several maneuvers have been described. In the present study, we analyze the pace and map (P&M) maneuver [atrial mapping during pulmonary vein (PV) pacing] to locate the gaps in redo PV isolation procedures.
Consecutive patients undergoing a second PV isolation procedure at a single institution over a 4-year period were included. For the last 2 years, all the patients (n = 38) studied underwent PV isolation based on the P&M maneuver and were compared to the previous patients (n = 45). The atrial side of the ablation line was mapped with the ablation catheter during PV pacing, and the earliest site was considered a gap site.
Shorter radiofrequency time was required to obtain PV isolation in the P&M group (485 ± 374 vs. 864 ± 544 s; p < 0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for the number of reconnected PVs (p = 0.01). We did not find significant differences in the procedure duration (106 ± 46 vs. 112 ± 53 min; p = 0.57) and arrhythmia recurrence during 1-year follow-up (26.6 vs. 28.9%; p = 0.82) after adjusting for several confounding factors (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.5–3.4; p = 0.57).
P&M is a simple maneuver to identify the gaps in ablation lines around the PV. It remains efficacious in redo procedures despite the difficulties in localizing the ablation lines performed in the first procedure. The P&M maneuver reduced the radiofrequency time required to isolate the PV without compromising the efficacy.
KeywordsAtrial fibrillation Pulmonary vein isolation Mapping Conduction gaps Redo
We acknowledge the cooperation of Rosa Crespo, Cristina Junco, Eva Lizana, Claudia Martín, and Miguel Hernández who helped in performing the procedures.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
J. Almendral has received honoraria for lectures from Abbott and Boston Scientific.
This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
- 1.Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;33:171–257.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Liu X, Dong J, Mavrakis HE, Hu F, Long D, Fang D, et al. Achievement of pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: a randomized comparison between two different isolation approaches. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:1263–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Arenal A, Atea L, Datino T, González-Torrecilla E, Atienza F, Almendral J, et al. Identification of conduction gaps in the ablation line during left atrium circumferential ablation: facilitation of pulmonary vein disconnection after endpoint modification according to electrogram characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:994–1002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Eitel C, Hindricks G, Sommer P, Gaspar T, Kircher S, Wetzel U, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear left atrial ablation as a single-catheter technique to achieve bidirectional conduction block: the pace-and-ablate approach. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:157–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Squara F, Frankel DS, Schaller R, Kapa S, Chik WW, Callans DJ, et al. Voltage mapping for delineating inexcitable dense scar in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: a new end point for enhancing pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1904–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Leo M, Pedersen MF, Rajappan K, Ginks M, Bashir Y, Betts TR. Premature termination of radiofrequency delivery during pulmonary vein isolation due to oesophageal temperature alerts: impact on acute and chronic pulmonary vein reconnection. Europace. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw102.
- 13.Galand V, Pavin D, Behar N, Auffret V, Fénéon D, Behaghel A, et al. Localization of gaps during redo ablations of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: preferential patterns depending on the choice of cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency ablation for the initial procedure. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109:591–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kim TH, Park J, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pulmonary vein reconnection predicts good clinical outcome after second catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw128.
- 19.Atienza F, Almendral J, Ormaetxe JM, Moya A, Martínez-Alday JD, Hernández-Madrid A, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2455–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar