Advertisement

Value of an old school approach: safety and long-term success of radiofrequency current catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children and young adolescents

  • Henrike Siebels
  • Christian Sohns
  • Jan-Hendrik Nürnberg
  • Jürgen Siebels
  • Klaus Langes
  • Joachim Hebe
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Radiofrequency current energy (RFC) ablation is still considered as the gold standard for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Success-rates for AVNRT ablation vary irrespective of the ablation technology and strategy. This study aimed to access safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of RFC catheter ablation for the treatment of AVNRT in children and adolescents aged < 19 years with special focus on modulation versus ablation of the AV nodal slow pathway (SP).

Methods

A total number of 1143 patients (pts) < 19 years were referred for invasive electrophysiological testing due to paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).

Results

Diagnosis of AVNRT was confirmed in 412 pts, and RFC-guided ablation was attempted in 386 pts (age 13.0 ± 3.5 years). No permanent complications were observed. RFC application resulted in SP-ablation in 171/386 (44.3%) and in SP modulation in 208/386 (53.9%) children, whereas attempts for RFC treatment failed in 7 pts. Follow-up was completed for 396/412 patients (96.1%). Within a mean follow-up period of 54.9 ± 39.7 months, in 51/379 pts (13.5%) AVNRT recurrence was observed. The median time until tachycardia recurrence was 19.5 months. No difference for AVNRT recurrence was found comparing SP ablation versus SP modulation (p > 0.05), whereas the recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with non-inducible SVT and therefore empiric SP treatment as compared to patients with inducible AVNRT (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

RFC-guided ablation for AVNRT in children and adolescents is safe and leads to an acceptable long-term freedom from recurrences. SP modulation and SP ablation resulted in comparable acute and long-term success rates. Late AVNRT recurrences can occur even after years of freedom from tachycardia-related symptoms.

Keywords

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia Catheter ablation Supraventricular tachycardia 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Prior to the procedure, written informed consent was obtained from the patients’ parents or guardian in all cases. The study has been approved by the institutional review board, and all patient information was anonymized.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ko JK, Deal BJ, Strasburger JF, Benson DW. Supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms and their age distribution in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1028–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mills MF, Motonaga KS, Trela A, Dubin AM, Avasarala K, Ceresnak SR. Is there a difference in tachycardia cycle length during SVT in children with AVRT and AVNRT? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:1206–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, et al. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry, by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:313–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan NY, Mok NS, Choy CC, Lau CL, Chu PS, Yuen HC, et al. Treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by cryoablation with an 8-mm-tip catheter versus radiofrequency ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34:295–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chanani NK, Chiesa NA, Dubin AM, Avasarala K, Van Hare GF, Collins KK. Cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in young patients: predictors of recurrence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31(9):1152–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krause U, Backhoff D, Klehs S, Kriebel T, Paul T, Schneider HE. Catheter ablation of pediatric AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: results in small children. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015;104:990–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drago F, Placidi S, Righi D, DI Mambro C, Russo MS, Silvetti MS, et al. Cryoablation of AVNRT in children and adolescents: early intervention leads to a better outcome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:398–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins KK, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, Avasarala K, Van Hare GF. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: initial experience with 4-mm cryocatheter. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3:564–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santangeli P, Proietti R, Di Biase L, Bai R, Natale A. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39:111–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kugler JD, Danford DA, Houston K, Felix G. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in children and adolescents without structural heart disease. Pediatric EP Soc, Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Registry Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1438–43.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kubuš P, Vít P, Gebauer RA, Zaoral L, Peichl P, Fiala M, et al. Long-term results of paediatric radiofrequency catheter ablation: a population-based study. Europace. 2012;16:1808–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reents T, Springer B, Ammar S, Wu J, Fichtner S, Jilek C, et al. Long-term follow-up after cryoablation for adolescent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: recurrence is not predictable. Europace. 2012;14:1629–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fishberger SB, Whalen R, Zahn EM, Welch EM, Rossi AF. Radiofrequency ablation of pediatric AV nodal reentrant tachycardia during the ice age: a single center experience in the cryoablation era. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:6–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drago F, Russo MS, Silvetti MS, DE Santis A, Iodice F, Naso Onofrio MT. Cryoablation of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: six years' experience and follow-up in a single center. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:475–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Backhoff D, Klehs S, Müller MJ, Schneider HE, Kriebel T, Paul T, et al. Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(11):e004264.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cokkinakis C1, Avramidis D, Alexopoulos C, Kirvassilis G, Papagiannis J. Cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children and adolescents: improved long-term outcomes with increasing experience. Hell J Cardiol. 2013;54:186–91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katritsis DG, Josephson ME. Classification, electrophysiological features and therapy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5:130–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, Chuquimia R, Rosen KM. Demonstration of dual A-V nodal pathways in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1973;48:549–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knight BP, Ebinger M, Oral H, Kim MH, Sticherling C, Pelosi F, et al. Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:574–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamini Sharif A, Vasheghani Farahani A, Davoodi GR, Kazemisaeid A, Fakhrzadeh H, Ghazanchai F. A new method for induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in non-inducible cases. Europace. 2011;13:1789–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Estner HL, Ndrepepa G, Dong J, Deisenhofer I, Schreieck J, Schneider M, et al. Acute and long-term results of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia—an analysis of the predictive factors for arrhythmia recurrence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:102–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bogun F, Knight B, Weiss R, Bahu M, Goyal R, Harvey M, et al. Slow pathway ablation in patients with documented but noninducible paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(4):1000–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Camm AJ, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias--executive summary. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1493–531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Swissa M, Birk E, Dagan T, Naimer SA, Fogelman M, Einbinder T, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in children with limited fluoroscopy. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:198–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Papagiannis J, Papadopoulou K, Rammos S, Katritsis D. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: long-term results. Hell J Cardiol. 2010;51:122–6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D, Saul JP, Tanel RE, Fischbach PS, et al. Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: recurrence at 1 year after initially successful ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:188–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D, Saul JP, Tanel RE, Fischbach PS, et al. Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: demographics, medical profiles, and initial outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15:759–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiplapinar N, Ergul Y, Akdeniz C, Saygi M, Ozyilmaz I, Gul EE, et al. Assessment of atrioventricular conduction following cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(6):712–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scaglione M, Ebrille E, Caponi D, Blandino A, DI Donna P, Siboldi A, et al. Single center experience of fluoroless AVNRT ablation guided by electroanatomic reconstruction in children and adolescents. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:1460–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Das S, Law IH, Von Bergen NH, Bradley DJ, Dick M 2nd, Etheridge SP, et al. Cryoablation therapy for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: a multicenter experience of efficacy. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:1147–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pott C, Wegner FK, Bögeholz N, Frommeyer G, Dechering DG, Zellerhoff S, et al. Outcome predictors of empirical slow pathway modulation: clinical and procedural characteristics and long-term follow-up. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015;104:946–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wegner FK, Silvano M, Bögeholz N, Leitz PR, Frommeyer G, Dechering DG, et al. Slow pathway modification in patients presenting with only two consecutive AV nodal echo beats. J Cardiol. 2017;69:471–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrike Siebels
    • 1
  • Christian Sohns
    • 1
  • Jan-Hendrik Nürnberg
    • 1
  • Jürgen Siebels
    • 1
  • Klaus Langes
    • 1
  • Joachim Hebe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ElectrophysiologyElectrophysiology Center BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations