Implementation of a near-zero fluoroscopy approach in interventional electrophysiology: impact of operator experience
- 40 Downloads
Catheter ablation is performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Reduction of radiation dose for patients and staff is emphasized by current recommendations. Previous studies have shown that lower operator experience leads to increased radiation dose. On the other hand, less experienced operators may depend even more on fluoroscopic guidance. Our study aimed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of a non-fluoroscopic approach in different training levels.
From January 2017, a near-zero fluoroscopy approach was established in two centers. Four operators (beginner, 1st year fellow, 2nd year fellow, expert) were instructed to perform the complete procedure with the use of a 3-D mapping system without fluoroscopy. A historical cohort that underwent procedures with fluoroscopy use served as control group. Dose area product (DPA), procedure duration, acute procedural success, and complications were compared between the groups and for each operator.
Procedures were performed in 157 patients. The first 100 patients underwent procedures with fluoroscopic guidance, the following 57 procedures were performed with the near-zero fluoroscopy approach. The results show a significant reduction in DPA for all operators immediately after implementation of the near-zero fluoroscopy protocol (control 637 ± 611 μGy/m2; beginner 44.1 ± 79.5 μGy/m2, p = 0.002; 1st year fellow 24.3 ± 46.4.5 μGy/m2, p = 0.001; 2nd year fellow 130.3 ± 233.3 μGy/m2, p = 0.003; expert 9.3 ± 37.4 μGy/m2, P < 0.001). Procedure duration, acute success, and complications were not significantly different between the groups.
Our results show a 90% reduction of DPA shortly after implementation of a near-zero fluoroscopy approach in interventional electrophysiology even in operators in training.
KeywordsCatheter ablation Radiation exposure Zero fluoroscopy Operator experience
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 11.Zipes DP, Calkins H, Daubert JP, Ellenbogen KA, Field ME, Fisher JD, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS advanced training statement on clinical cardiac electrophysiology (a revision of the ACC/AHA 2006 update of the clinical competence statement on invasive electrophysiology studies, catheter ablation, and cardioversion). Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:e3-e37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kleemann T, Brachmann J, Lewalter T, Andresen D, Willems S, Spitzer SG, et al. Development of radiation exposure in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation in Germany between 2007 and 2014: great potential to minimize radiation dosage. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Oct;105(10):858–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Attanasio P, Schreiber T, Pieske B, Blaschke F, Boldt LH, Haverkamp W, et al. Pushing the limits: establishing an ultra-low framerate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol for left atrial ablations. Europace. 2017 Mar 4; https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux010.
- 15.Huo Y, Christoph M, Forkmann M, Pohl M, Mayer J, Salmas J, et al. Reduction of radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, and controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(9):1945–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar