First results and follow-up of a second-generation circular mapping and ablation catheter

  • Stefan Weber
  • Martin Höher
  • Dominik Schultes



Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency energy is widely used as a strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Anatomically designed catheters have been developed to increase the efficiency of AF ablation procedures. The second-generation circular ablation catheter, PVAC GOLD, was re-designed to improve energy delivery and mitigate emboli. We investigated the procedural efficiency, biophysics, and chronic efficacy of PVAC GOLD in patients with AF.


We consecutively enrolled 40 patients (60 ± 11 years) with highly symptomatic, drug refractory AF. The first 20 patients were treated with the first-generation PVAC. The subsequent 20 patients were treated with the second-generation PVAC GOLD catheter. All patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months.


All 164 targeted PVs were successfully isolated. Ablations performed with PVAC GOLD showed a significant reduction in total number of ablations needed for PVI, fluoroscopy, and procedure times compared to PVAC (34.7 ± 7.0 vs. 27.0 ± 6.5; p = 0.009), fluoroscopy (29.5 ± 9.5 vs. 23.4 ± 7.0; p = 0.026), and procedure time (93.8 ± 18.9 vs. 83.1 ± 10.6; p = 0.033). PVAC GOLD showed improved biophysics including a reduction of low power ablations and an increase in mean effective energy delivery. At 12 months follow-up, AF recurrence rates were comparable in the two groups (35 vs. 30 %; p = 0.735). There were no adverse events.


The redesigned PVAC GOLD catheter demonstrates a reduction in radiofrequency ablation and procedure time and improved biophysics while maintaining chronic efficacy compared to the first-generation PVAC.


Atrial fibrillation Catheter ablation Phased RF Multi-electrode ablation catheter 


Compliance with ethical standards

Written consent was obtained from all the patients, and the study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Bayreuth Hospital.


  1. 1.
    Wolf PA, Mitchell JB, Baker CS, Kannel WB, D’Agostino RB. Impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality, stroke, and medical costs. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:229–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:632–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boersma LV, Wijffels MC, Oral H, Wever EF, Morady F. Pulmonary vein isolation by duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency energy with a multielectrode ablation catheter. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:1635–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fredersdorf S, Weber S, Jilek C, Heinicke N, von Bary C, Jungbauer C, et al. Safe and rapid isolation of pulmonary veins using a novel circular ablation catheter and duty-cycled RF generator. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:1097–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    von Bary C, Weber S, Dornia C, Eissnert C, Fellner C, Latzin P, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary vein stenosis after pulmonary vein isolation using a novel circular mapping and ablation catheter (PVAC). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(5):630–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wieczorek M, Hoeltgen R, Akin E, Salili AR, Oral H, Morady F. Results of short-term and long-term pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency energy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(4):399–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaita F, Leclercq JF, Schumacher B, Scaglione M, Toso E, Halimi F, et al. Incidence of silent cerebral thrombomembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;2:961–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herrera Siklódy C, Deneke T, Hocini M, Lehrmann H, Shin DI, Miyazaki S, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(7):681–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verma A, Debruyne P, Nardi S, Deneke T, DeGreef Y, Spitzer S, et al. L. Evaluation and reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism in ablation of atrial fibrillation, but high prevalence of chronic silent infarction: results of the evaluation of reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:835–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haines DE, Stewart MT, Dahlberg S, Barka ND, Condie C, Fiedler GR, et al. Microembolism and catheter ablation I: a comparison of irrigated radiofrequency and multielectrode phased radiofrequency catheter ablation of pulmonary vein Ostia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(1):16–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haines DE, Stewart MT, Barka ND, Kirchhof N, Lentz LR, Reinking NM, et al. Microembolism and catheter ablation II: effects of cerebral microemboli injection in a canine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(1):23–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haines DE, Strunk AR, Novichenok A, Kirchhof N, Stewart MT. The biophysics of passive convective cooling during catheter ablation with gold versus platinum electrodes and multielectrode phased radiofrequency energy delivery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Greef Y, Dekker L, Boersma L, Murray S, Wieczorek M, Spitzer SG, et al. Low rate of asymptomatic cerebral embolism and improved procedural efficiency with the novel PVAC GOLD: Results of the PRECISION GOLD trial. Europace. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hocini M, Kirchhof NA, Condie C, Stewart MT. Strong correlation between RF biophysics, contact assessment, and lesion quality in a temperature-controlled, multi-electrode ablation system. Europace. 2014; 16(suppl 2);Abstract 136_80.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bulava A, Hanis J, Sitek D, Osmera O, Karpianus D, Snorek M, et al. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33:1039–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bittner A, Monnig G, Zellerhoff S, Pott C, Kobe J, Dechering D, et al. Randomized study comparing duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency with point-by-point ablation in pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1383–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCready J, Chow AW, Lowe MD, Segal OR, Ahsan S, de Bono J. Safety and efficacy of multipolar pulmonary vein ablation catheter vs. irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicentre trial. Europace. 2014;16(8):1145–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Greef Y, Buysschaert I, Schwagten B, Stockman D, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M. Duty-cycled multi-electrode radiofrequency vs. conventional irrigated point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation: comparative 3-year data. Europace. 2014;16(6):820–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gal P, Aarntzen AE, Smit JJ, Adiyaman A, Misier AR, Delnoy PP, et al. Conventional radiofrequency catheter ablation compared to multi-electrode ablation for atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176(3):891–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewalter T, Weiss C, Spencker S, Jung W, Haverkamp W, Willems S. Gold vs. platinum-iridium tip catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: the AURUM 8 study. Europace. 2011;13(1):102–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Greef Y, Tavernier R, Schwagten B, De Keulenaer G, Stockman D, Duytschaever M. Impact of radiofrequency characteristics on acute pulmonary vein reconnection and clinical outcome after PVAC ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(3):290–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Weber
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin Höher
    • 1
  • Dominik Schultes
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinikum BayreuthDepartment of Cardiology and ElectrophysiologyBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.University of Regensburg and Praxis für Kardiologie und RhythmologieRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations