Localization of pacing and defibrillator leads using standard x-ray views is frequently inaccurate and is not reproducible
- 184 Downloads
While the accuracy of roentography for evaluation of lead tip position compared with three-dimensional imaging techniques has been well described, there remains considerable variability in the interpretation of the reproducibility of standard x-ray for right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) lead position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) lead tip position as determined by board-certified cardiac electrophysiologists (EP) using standard x-ray views.
EP interpretations of RV and LV lead tip position using standard x-ray views (posterior-anterior, lateral, and left anterior oblique) were compared to thoracic computed tomography (CT). The accuracy of x-ray interpretation was compared to the reference CT location, and the reproducibility of x-ray interpretation was tested using the free-marginal Kappa statistic.
A total of 58 EPs were invited to participate in the survey with a response rate of 43 % (25/58). The agreement between x-ray and CT lead tip position (accuracy) was 37 % for RV lead, 33 % for longitudinal LV lead, and 41 % for short axis LV lead. Reproducibility was 64 % for RV lead tip (k = 0.46), 58 % for longitudinal LV lead tip (k = 0.37), and 39 % for short axis LV lead tip (k = 0.24).
Conventional roentography is limited in its ability to accurately and reliably determine pacing lead tip position.
KeywordsPacing Defibrillation X-ray Accuracy Validity
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Left anterior oblique
Larry R Jackson II: concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, drafting article, critical revision of article, approval of article
Jonathan P. Piccini Sr.: concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, drafting article, critical revision of article, approval of article
Lynne Hurwitz Koweek: concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, critical revision of article, approval of article
James P. Daubert: concept/design, critical revision of article, approval of article
Brett D. Atwater: concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, drafting article, critical revision of article, approval of article
This study is a retrospective analysis of previously collected data. No patient information was obtained for the purposes of this study.
This work was not supported by any specific funding source.
- 3.Ng, A. C. T., Allman, C., Vidaic, J., Tie, H., Hopkins, A. P., & Leung, D. Y. (2009). Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block. American Journal of Cardiology, 103(8), 1096–1101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Singh, J. P., Klein, H. U., Huang, D. T., Reek, S., Kuniss, M., Quesada, A., et al. (2011). Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation, 123(11), 1159–1166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Osmancik, P., Stros, P., Herman, D., Curila, K., Petr, R. (2013) The insufficiency of left anterior oblique and the usefulness of right anterior oblique projection for correct localization of a CT-verified right ventricular lead into the midseptum. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. Google Scholar
- 10.Zhang, X.-H., Chen, H. U. A., Siu, C.-W., Yiu, K.-H., Chan, W.-S., Lee, K. L., et al. (2008). New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 19(2), 136–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Thébault, C., Donal, E., Meunier, C., Gervais, R., Gerritse, B., Gold, M. R., et al. (2012). Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. European Heart Journal, 33(21), 2662–2671.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rickard, J., Ingelmo, C., Sraow, D., Wilkoff, B. L., Grimm, R. A., Schoenhagen, P., et al. (2011). Chest radiography is a poor predictor of left ventricular lead position in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 32(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Duckett, S. G., Ginks, M. R., Knowles, B. R., Ma, Y., Shetty, A., Bostock, J., et al. (2011). Advanced image fusion to overlay coronary sinus anatomy with real-time fluoroscopy to facilitate left ventricular lead implantation in CRT. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 34(2), 226–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kumar, P., Blendea, D., Nandigam, V., Moore, S. A., Heist, E. K., & Singh, J. P. (2010). Assessment of the post-implant final left ventricular lead position: a comparative study between radiographic and angiographic modalities. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 29(1), 17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar