Combined identification of septal flash and absence of myocardial scar by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

  • Manav Sohal
  • Sana Amraoui
  • Zhong Chen
  • Eva Sammut
  • Tom Jackson
  • Matthew Wright
  • Mark O’Neill
  • Jaswinder Gill
  • Gerald Carr-White
  • C. Aldo Rinaldi
  • Reza Razavi
Article

Abstract

Background and aims of study

Septal flash (SF) describes early inward motion of the ventricular septum in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and correction corresponds to increased response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). SF has traditionally been assessed by echocardiography. We sought to determine if cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could identify SF and if the additional assessment of scar would improve the ability of CMR to predict CRT response.

Methods

Fifty-two patients with LBBB and heart failure underwent prospective CMR scanning prior to CRT implantation. The presence of SF was assessed visually and by using endocardial contour-tracking software. Presence and extent of myocardial scar was assessed by delayed enhancement imaging during CMR. The association between SF, scar and reverse remodelling (RR) at 6 months was explored.

Results

RR rate to CRT at 6 months was 52 %. CMR-derived SF was identified in 24 (46 %) patients. RR was seen in more patients with SF than those without (88 % vs 21 %; P < 0.001). The absence of scar combined with the presence of SF had 96 % specificity for predicting RR. In a multivariate regression model, the presence of SF was the only independent predictor of RR.

Conclusion

SF can be assessed by CMR and predicts increased response to CRT. The additional value of CMR is the assessment of scar. The presence of SF with no scar is a highly specific predictor of CRT response.

Keywords

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Septal flash Scar imaging Cardiac resynchronization therapy 

Abbreviations

SF

Septal flash

CRT

Cardiac resynchronization therapy

LBBB

Left bundle branch block

ECG

Electrocardiograph

CMR

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

NICM

Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

ICM

Ischaemic cardiomyopathy

NYHA

New York Heart Association

Notes

Competing interests

Dr Sohal receives an educational grant from St Jude Medical; Dr Chen receives an educational grant from Medtronic; Dr Rinaldi receives funding from St Jude Medical and Medtronic; Prof Razavi receives an investigator led grant from Philips Healthcare.

Grant support

Supported in part by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, W. T., Fisher, W. G., Smith, A. L., et al. (2002). Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1845–1853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bristow, M. R., Saxon, L. A., Boehmer, J., et al. (2004). Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 2140–2150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cleland, J. G., Daubert, J. C., Erdmann, E., et al. (2005). The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 1539–1549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brignole, M., Auricchio, A., Baron-Esquivias, G., et al. (2013). 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). European Heart Journal, 34, 2281–2329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mollema, S. A., Bleeker, G. B., van der Wall, E. E., Schalij, M. J., & Bax, J. J. (2007). Usefulness of QRS duration to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology, 100, 1665–1670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ypenburg, C., van Bommel, R. J., Borleffs, C. J., et al. (2009). Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53, 483–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung, E. S., Leon, A. R., Tavazzi, L., et al. (2008). Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation, 117, 2608–2616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerckhoffs, R. C., Faris, O. P., Bovendeerd, P. H., et al. (2005). Electromechanics of paced left ventricle simulated by straightforward mathematical model: comparison with experiments. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 289, H1889–H1897.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Voigt, J. U., Schneider, T. M., Korder, S., et al. (2009). Apical transverse motion as surrogate parameter to determine regional left ventricular function inhomogeneities: a new, integrative approach to left ventricular asynchrony assessment. European Heart Journal, 30, 959–968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parsai, C., Bijnens, B., Sutherland, G. R., et al. (2009). Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms. European Heart Journal, 30, 940–949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Boeck, B. W., Teske, A. J., Meine, M., et al. (2009). Septal rebound stretch reflects the functional substrate to cardiac resynchronization therapy and predicts volumetric and neurohormonal response. European Journal of Heart Failure, 11, 863–871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirn, B., Jansen, A., Bracke, F., van Gelder, B., Arts, T., & Prinzen, F. W. (2008). Mechanical discoordination rather than dyssynchrony predicts reverse remodeling upon cardiac resynchronization. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 295, H640–H646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kapetanakis, S., Kearney, M. T., Siva, A., Gall, N., Cooklin, M., & Monaghan, M. J. (2005). Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a novel technique to quantify global left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Circulation, 112, 992–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, H., & Amini, A. A. (2012). Cardiac motion and deformation recovery from MRI: a review. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 31, 487–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knol, M. J., Le Cessie, S., Algra, A., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Groenwold, R. H. (2012). Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne, 184, 895–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strauss, D. G., Selvester, R. H., & Wagner, G. S. (2011). Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 107, 927–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsao, J., Boesiger, P., & Pruessmann, K. P. (2003). k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 50, 1031–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bleeker, G. B., Kaandorp, T. A., Lamb, H. J., et al. (2006). Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation, 113, 969–976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duckett, S. G., Camara O., Ginks, M. R., et al. (2012). Relationship between endocardial activation sequences defined by high-density mapping to early septal contraction (septal flash) in patients with left bundle branch block undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Europace, 14, 99–106.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muellerleile, K., Stork, A., Bansmann, M., et al. (2008). Detection of mechanical ventricular asynchrony by high temporal resolution cine MRI. European Radiology, 18, 1329–1337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marsan, N. A., Westenberg, J. J., Ypenburg, C., et al. (2009). Magnetic resonance imaging and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony and scar tissue. European Heart Journal, 30, 2360–2367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petryka, J., Misko, J., Przybylski, A., et al. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of intraventricular dyssynchrony and delayed enhancement as predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure of ischaemic and non-ischaemic etiologies. European Journal of Radiology, 81, 2639–2647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stavrakis, S., Lazzara, R., & Thadani, U. (2012). The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy and QRS duration: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 163–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grant, R. P., & Dodge, H. T. (1956). Mechanisms of QRS complex prolongation in man; left ventricular conduction disturbances. The American Journal of Medicine, 20, 834–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strauss, D. G., Selvester, R. H., Lima, J. A., et al. (2008). ECG quantification of myocardial scar in cardiomyopathy patients with or without conduction defects: correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance and arrhythmogenesis. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 1, 327–336.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Andersson, L. G., Wu, K. C., Wieslander, B., et al. (2013). Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by cardiac magnetic resonance is greater in patients with strict vs nonstrict electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle-branch block. American Heart Journal, 165, 956–963.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Risum, N., Strauss, D., Sogaard, P., et al. (2013). Left bundle-branch block: the relationship between electrocardiogram electrical activation and echocardiography mechanical contraction. American Heart Journal, 166, 340–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Auricchio, A., Fantoni, C., Regoli, F., et al. (2004). Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation, 109, 1133–1139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sohal, M., Shetty, A., Duckett, S. G., et al. (2013). Non-invasive assessment of LV contraction patterns using CMR to identify responders to CRT. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, 6, 864–873.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bilchick, K. C., Kamath, S., DiMarco, J. P., & Stukenborg, G. J. (2010). Bundle-branch block morphology and other predictors of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in Medicare patients. Circulation, 122, 2022–2030.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McDonald, I. G. (1973). Echocardiographic demonstration of abnormal motion of the interventricular septum in left bundle branch block. Circulation, 48, 272–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Little, W. C., Reeves, R. C., Arciniegas, J., Katholi, R. E., & Rogers, E. W. (1982). Mechanism of abnormal interventricular septal motion during delayed left ventricular activation. Circulation, 65, 1486–1491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parsai, C., Baltabaeva, A., Anderson, L., Chaparro, M., Bijnens, B., & Sutherland, G. R. (2009). Low-dose dobutamine stress echo to quantify the degree of remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. European Heart Journal, 30, 950–958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manav Sohal
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Sana Amraoui
    • 3
  • Zhong Chen
    • 1
  • Eva Sammut
    • 1
  • Tom Jackson
    • 1
  • Matthew Wright
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark O’Neill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jaswinder Gill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gerald Carr-White
    • 2
  • C. Aldo Rinaldi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Reza Razavi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing′s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Cardiothoracic DepartmentGuy′s and St Thomas′ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  3. 3.Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-LévèqueUniversité Victor Segalen Bordeaux IIBordeauxFrance
  4. 4.Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing′s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations