Dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of observational studies
- First Online:
- 687 Downloads
Dabigatran is approved for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The safety and effectiveness of periprocedural dabigatran in ablation for AF are unknown.
We performed a meta-analysis of all studies comparing periprocedural dabigatran with warfarin for anticoagulation in AF ablation. Studies of >100 patients with post-procedure follow-up were included. Outcomes were compared by calculating maximum likelihood estimates with confidence intervals. The co-primary endpoints were neurological events and major bleeding.
Ten cohort studies were included, including a total of 1,501 patients receiving dabigatran and 2,356 receiving warfarin. The mean age was 59–64 years and inclusion of women varied (10–33 %). Intra-procedural unfractionated heparin and irrigated ablation catheters were used routinely. Adverse events were low overall; however, the dabigatran group demonstrated a numerical excess of neurological events (10/1,501 [0.7 %] versus 4/2,356 [0.2 %]), but equivalent major bleeding outcomes (24/1,501 [1.6 %] versus 40/2,356 [1.7 %]). In the meta-analysis, there was a nonsignificant trend towards higher rates of the composite primary endpoints (any neurological event or major bleeding) in the dabigatran group. Dabigatran demonstrated a significantly higher rate of neurological events (estimated absolute risk difference 0.0047, 95 % confidence interval 0.0007 to 0.0099).
Compared with warfarin, dabigatran may be associated with a higher frequency of periprocedural neurological events following radiofrequency ablation of AF. Randomized clinical trials are needed to definitively assess the safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulant use for periprocedural anticoagulation for ablation of AF.
KeywordsAtrial fibrillation Ablation Dabigatran Warfarin Meta-analysis
- 1.Fuster, V., Ryden, L. E., Cannom, D. S., Crijns, H. J., Curtis, A. B., Ellenbogen, K. A., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation, 123(10), e269-367, doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318214876d Google Scholar
- 2.Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S. A., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.Google Scholar
- 7.Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W65–W94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hasselblad, V., Mosteller, F., Littenberg, B., Chalmers, T. C., Hunink, M. G., Turner, J. A., et al. (1995). A survey of current problems in meta-analysis. Discussion from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research inter-PORT Work Group on Literature Review/Meta-Analysis. Medical Care, 33(2), 202–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bunch, T. J., Crandall, B. G., Weiss, J. P., Osborn, J. S., May, H. T., & Day, J. D. (2011). Pradaxa can be safely used as monotherapy or as a bridge to therapeutic warfarin after atrial fibrillation ablation. Circulation, 124(21).Google Scholar
- 13.Yamaji, H., Murakami, T., Kawamura, H., Murakami, M., & Hina, K. (2012). Safety of dabigatran for atrial fibrillation ablation as a periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Heart Rhythm, 9(5), S170.Google Scholar
- 14.Nin, T., Sairaku, A., Yoshida, Y., Kamiya, H., Tatematsu, Y., Nanasato, M., et al. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of dabigatran versus warfarin for periablation anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 36(2), 172-179. doi:10.1111/pace.12036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gangireddy, S., Coffey, J. O., Calenda, B. W., Teh, A., Miller, M., Skipitaris, N. T., et al. (2012). The incidence of stroke after atrial fibrillation ablation in patients on dabigatran. Heart Rhythm, 9(5), S472.Google Scholar
- 16.Mendoza, I., Helguera, M., Baez-Escudero, J., Reina, J., & Pinski, S. L. (2012). Atrial fibrillation ablation on uninterrupted anticoagulation with dabigatran versus warfarin. Heart Rhythm, 9(5), S270–S271. Abstract.Google Scholar
- 17.Rowley, C. P., Bradford, N. S., Bernard, M. L., Sidney, D. S., Brabham, W. W., Netzler, P. C., et al. (2012). Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients anticoagulated with dabigatran compared to warfarin. Heart Rhythm, 9(5), S201.Google Scholar
- 18.Ellis, C. R., Streur, M. M., & Nagarakanti, R. (2012). Safety and efficacy of dabigatran versus warfarin in patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm, 9(5), S421.Google Scholar
- 19.Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, Y. M., Di Biase, L., Vanga, S. R., Santangeli, P., Swarup, V., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation results from a multicenter prospective registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59(13), 1168–1174. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Snipelisky, D., Kauffman, C., Prussak, K., Johns, G., Venkatachalam, K., & Kusumoto, F. (2012). A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 35(1), 29–33. doi:10.1007/s10840-012-9708-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Haines, D. E., Mead-Salley, M., Salazar, M., Marchlinski, F. E., Zado, E., Calkins, H., et al. (2013). Dabigatran versus warfarin anticoagulation before and after catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. doi:10.1007/s10840-013-9800-z.
- 26.Boehringer-Ingelheim. (2010). Dabigatran prescribing information. http://bidocs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/BIWebAccess/ViewServlet.ser?docBase=renetnt&folderPath=/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Pradaxa/Pradaxa.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2011.
- 27.Cohen, M., Mahaffey, K. W., Pieper, K., Pollack, C. V., Jr., Antman, E. M., Hoekstra, J., et al. (2006). A subgroup analysis of the impact of prerandomization antithrombin therapy on outcomes in the SYNERGY trial: enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 48(7), 1346–1354. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.058.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.White, H. D., Chew, D. P., Hoekstra, J. W., Miller, C. D., Pollack, C. V., Jr., Feit, F., et al. (2008). Safety and efficacy of switching from either unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin to bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an invasive strategy: results from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51(18), 1734–1741. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Eikelboom, J. W., Wallentin, L., Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M., Healey, J. S., Oldgren, J., et al. (2011). Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation, 123(21), 2363–2372. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.004747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Healey, J. S., Eikelboom, J., Douketis, J., Wallentin, L., Oldgren, J., Yang, S., et al. (2012). Peri-procedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared to warfarin: results from the RE-LY Randomized Trial. Circulation, 126(3), 343–348. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.090464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Schirmer, S. H., Baumhakel, M., Neuberger, H. R., Hohnloser, S. H., van Gelder, I. C., Lip, G. Y., et al. (2010). Novel anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current clinical evidence and future developments. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 56(25), 2067–2076. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar