Pacing polarity and left ventricular mechanical activation sequence in cardiac resynchronization therapy
- 178 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between polarity of left ventricular (LV) pacing and the resultant regional, global, and transmural mechanical sequence of contraction.
Background
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is widely utilized in patients with drug refractory congestive heart failure with systolic dysfunction (EF <35 %) and intraventricular conduction delay (QRS duration >120 ms). However, little is known about polarity of pacing stimulation and the resultant differences in LV mechanics.
Methods
The polarity of pacing was altered sequentially in 20 patients (73 ± 13, 16 males) with preexisting biventricular devices with potential choice of multiple vectors for pacing stimulation. Initial unipolar or extended bipolar configurations were switched to bipolar configuration or vice versa, and echocardiographic images were acquired for off-line analysis. Regional and global LV longitudinal and radial mechanics were assessed selectively from the subendocardial and subepicardial regions with 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography. Left ventricular capture by each vector configuration was confirmed by local lead capture and appropriate QRS alteration.
Results
Unipolar pacing resulted in increased dispersion of LV regional endocardial strains with a higher base-to-apex gradients of longitudinal shortening strains (P < 0.05). LV longitudinal shortening strain magnitude was higher at LV base with bipolar stimulation in comparison with unipolar stimulation (−10.5 ± 10.5 vs. −4.2 ± 6.3, P = 0.02).
Conclusion
There is a difference in the mechanical activation sequence of the LV between unipolar vs. bipolar pacing stimulation. This may have important implications for CRT.
Keywords
Resynchronization Heart failure PacemakerAbbreviations
- 2D CPA
2D cardiac performance analysis
- CRT
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- CRT-D
Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator
- CS
Circumferential strain
- DMI
Doppler myocardial imaging
- ECG
Electrocardiogram
- EF
Ejection fraction
- LS
Longitudinal strain
- LV
Left ventricular/left ventricle
- RS
Radial strain
- RV
Right ventricular
References
- 1.American Heart Association. (2001). 2002 heart and stroke statistical update. Dallas: American Heart Association.Google Scholar
- 2.Healthcare cost and utilization project (database). Data from 1999 to 2000. Rockville, MD. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/hcupnet.htm.
- 3.Aaronson, K. D., Schwartz, J. S., Chen, T. M., Wong, K. L., Goin, J. E., & Mancini, D. M. (1997). Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation, 95, 2660–2667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Farwell, D., Patel, N. R., Hall, A., Ralph, S., & Sulke, A. N. (2000). How many people with heart failure are appropriate for biventricular resynchronization? European Heart Journal, 21, 1246–1250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brophy, J. M., Deslauriers, G., & Rouleau, J. L. (1994). Long-term prognosis of patients presenting to the emergency room with decompensated congestive heart failure. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 10, 543–547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Shamim, W., Francis, D. P., Yousufuddin, M., et al. (1999). Intraventricular conduction delay: A prognostic marker in chronic heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology, 70, 171–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Unverferth, D. V., Magorien, R. D., Moeschberger, M. L., Baker, P. B., Fetters, J. K., & Leier, C. V. (1984). Factors influencing the one-year mortality of dilated cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 54, 147–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Xiao, H. B., Roy, C., Fujimoto, S., & Gibson, D. G. (1996). Natural history of abnormal conduction and its relation to prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. International Journal of Cardiology, 53, 163–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Morris-Thurgood, J. A., & Frenneaux, M. P. (2000). Pacing in congestive heart failure. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine, 1, 107–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hare, J. M. (2002). Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1902–1905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Abraham, W. T., Fisher, W. G., Smith, A. L., et al. (2002). Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1845–1853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Gras, D., Leclercq, C., Tang, A. S., Bucknall, C., Luttikhuis, H. O., & Kirstein-Pedersen, A. (2002). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure the multicenter InSync clinical study. European Journal of Heart Failure, 4, 311–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Auricchio, A., Stellbrink, C., Block, M., et al. (1999). Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group. The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group. Circulation, 99, 2993–3001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Yu, C. M., Fung, W. H., Lin, H., Zhang, Q., Sanderson, J. E., & Lau, C. P. (2003). Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 91, 684–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ng, D. W., Karpiak, J. L., Wissner, E., Altemose, G. T., Scott, L. R., & Srivathsan, K. (2008). Influence of left ventricular pacing polarity in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm, 5(Suppl 336), 79.Google Scholar
- 16.Ellenbogen, K. A., Neal, K. G., & Wilkoff, B. L. (2000). Clinical effects of cardiac pacing and defibrillation (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- 17.Kadish, A. H., Schmaltz, S., & Morady, F. (1991). A comparison of QRS complexes resulting from unipolar and bipolar pacing: Implications for pace-mapping. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 14, 823–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Schuchert, A., Frese, J., Stammwitz, E., et al. (2002). Low settings of the ventricular pacing output in patients dependent on a pacemaker: Are they really safe? American Heart Journal, 143, 1009–1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Soejima, K., Stevenson, W. G., Maisel, W. H., Sapp, J. L., & Epstein, L. M. (2002). Electrically unexcitable scar mapping based on pacing threshold for identification of the reentry circuit isthmus: Feasibility for guiding ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circulation, 106, 1678–1683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Durrer, D., & Van Der Twell, L. H. (1953). Spread of activation in the left ventricular wall of the dog. I. American Heart Journal, 46, 683–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar