An approach to left septal slow pathway ablation

  • Demosthenes G. Katritsis
  • Eleftherios Giazitzoglou
  • Theodoros Zografos
  • Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
  • A. John Camm
Article

Abstract

Background

Slow pathway ablation or modification eliminates typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), but in less than 5% of patients cannot be accomplished from the right side.

Methods

Consecutive, consenting patients (n = 221), aged 37 ± 7 years, 177 women, with slow–fast AVNRT, underwent slow pathway ablation. Mapping was restricted to the inferior part of the triangle of Koch, and end-points of ablation were induction of a junctional rhythm with retrograde atrial conduction and non-inducibility of AVNRT. Unsuccessful cases were ablated via a transeptal approach from the left septum with the aid of a left-sided His recording electrode.

Results

Right-sided ablation was successful in 217 of 221 cases. In four patients (1.8%), left-sided ablation was necessary. Procedure, fluoroscopy times, and number of lesions were 105 min (82.4–135) vs. 65 min (60–90) (p = 0.013), 31.9 (23.9–34.3) vs. 9.6 (6.2–14.2) min (p = 0.001), and seven (5.5–7.8) vs. four (4–5; p = 0.004) for left- vs. right-sided procedures, respectively. During a follow-up period of 1–3 years, three patients (1.3%) in the right group had AVNRT recurrence. All had residual dual pathway physiology following ablation, while only 20.3% of patients without AVNRT had residual dual AV nodal conduction (p < 0.001). No conduction disturbances were seen. In the left-sided ablation group, no AVNRT recurrences or AV block were seen.

Conclusions

Ablation with the protocol described offers a high success rate with an extremely low risk of AV block when left-sided ablation is necessary in patients with typical AVNRT who have failed a right-sided approach.

Keywords

Atrioventricular node Supraventricular tachycardia Radiofrequency ablation 

References

  1. 1.
    Jackman, W. M., Beckman, K. J., McClelland, J. H., Wang, X., Friday, K. J., Roman, C. A., et al. (1992). Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry, by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 313–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haissaguerre, M., Gaita, F., Fischer, B., Commenges, D., Montserrat, P., d’Ivernois, C., et al. (1992). Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation, 85, 2162–2175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalbfleisch, S. J., Strickberger, S. A., Williamson, B., Vorperian, V. R., Man, C., Hummel, J. D., et al. (1994). Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 23, 716–723.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, P. C., Chen, S. A., & Hwang, B. (2009). Atrioventricular node anatomy and physiology: Implications for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 24, 105–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spector, P., Reynolds, M. R., Calkins, H., Sondhi, M., Xu, Y., Martin, A., et al. (2009). Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia. The American Journal of Cardiology, 104, 671–677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ricard, P., Latcu, D. G., Yaïci, K., Zarqane, N., & Saoudi, N. (2010). Slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with AVNRT: Junctional rhythm is less frequent during magnetic navigation ablation than with the conventional technique. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 33(1), 11–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hintringer, F., Hartikainen, J., Davies, D. W., Heald, S. C., Gill, J. S., Ward, D. E., et al. (1995). Prediction of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of the atrioventricular node. Circulation, 92, 3490–3496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaïs, P., Haïssaguerre, M., Shah, D. C., Coste, P., Takahashi, A., Barold, S. S., et al. (1999). Successful radiofrequency ablation of a slow atrioventricular nodal pathway on the left posterior atrial septum. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 22, 525–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kilic, A., Amasyali, B., Kose, S., Aytemir, K., Celik, T., Kursaklioglu, H., et al. (2005). Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablated from left atrial septum: clinical and electrophysiological characteristics and long-term follow-up results as compared to conventional right-sided ablation. International Heart Journal, 46, 1023–1031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Altemose, G. T., Scott, L. R., & Miller, J. M. (2000). Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia requiring ablation on the mitral annulus. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 11, 1281–1284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorbera, C., Cohen, M., Woolf, P., & Kalapatapu, S. R. (2000). Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: Slow pathway ablation using the transseptal approach. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 23, 1343–1349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kobza, R., Hindricks, G., Tanner, H., & Kottkamp, H. (2005). Left-septal ablation of the fast pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia refractory to right septal ablation. Europace, 7, 149–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stoyanov, M. K., Shalganov, T. N., Protich, M. M., & Balabanski, T. L. (2010). Selective slow pathway ablation using transseptal approach in a patient with surgically corrected partial atrioventricular canal defect and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia of the common type. Europace, 12(5), 756–757.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katritsis, D. G. (2010). Left septal slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace, 12(7), 1042–1043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thakur, R. K., Klein, G. J., Yee, R., & Stites, H. W. (1993). Junctional tachycardia: A useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22, 1706–1710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jentzer, J. H., Goyal, R., Williamson, B. D., Man, K. C., Niebauer, M., Daoud, E., et al. (1994). Analysis of junctional ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation, 90, 2820–2826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katritsis, D. G., Becker, A. E., Ellenbogen, K. A., Karabinos, I., Giazitzoglou, E., Korovesis, S., et al. (2004). Right and left inferior extensions of the atrioventricular node may represent the anatomic substrate of the slow pathway in the human. HeartRhythm, 1, 582–586.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katritsis, D. G., Becker, A. E., Ellenbogen, K. A., Giazitzoglou, E., Korovesis, S., & Camm, A. J. (2006). Effect of slow pathway ablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia on the electrophysiologic characteristics of the inferior atrial inputs to the human atrioventricular node. The American Journal of Cardiology, 97, 860–865.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katritsis, D. G., Ellenbogen, K. A., Becker, A. E., & Camm, A. J. (2007). Retrograde slow pathway conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace, 9, 458–465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katritsis, D. G., & Camm, A. J. (2010). Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Circulation., 122, 831–840.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clague, J. R., Dagres, N., Kottkamp, H., Breithardt, G., & Borggrefe, M. (2001). Targeting the slow pathway for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Initial results and long-term follow-up in 379 consecutive patients. European Heart Journal, 22, 82–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, H. G., Klein, G. J., Stites, H. W., Zardini, M., Morillo, C. A., Thakur, R. K., et al. (1993). Elimination of slow pathway conduction: An accurate indicator of clinical success after radiofrequency atrioventricular node modification. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22, 1849–1853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baker, J. H., 2nd, Plumb, V. J., Epstein, A. E., & Kay, G. N. (1994). Predictors of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry after selective slow pathway ablation. The American Journal of Cardiology, 73, 765–769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tebbenjohanns, J., Pfeiffer, D., Schumacher, B., Manz, M., & Lüderitz, B. (1995). Impact of the local atrial electrogram in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: Ablation versus modification of the slow pathway. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 6, 245–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manolis, A. S., Wang, P. J., & Estes, N. A., 3rd. (1994). Radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Do arrhythmia recurrences correlate with persistent slow pathway conduction or site of successful ablation? Circulation, 90, 2815–2819.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Demosthenes G. Katritsis
    • 1
  • Eleftherios Giazitzoglou
    • 1
  • Theodoros Zografos
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
    • 2
  • A. John Camm
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyAthens EuroclinicAthensGreece
  2. 2.Division of CardiologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Cardiac and Vascular SciencesSt George’s University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations