This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific ontology: Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fahrbach, L. (2011). Theory change and degrees of success. Philosophy of Science,78(5), 1283–1292.
Fahrbach, L. (2017). Scientific revolutions and the explosion of scientific evidence. Synthese,194(12), 5039–5072.
French, S. (2017). Realism and metaphysics. In J. Saatsi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of scientific realism (pp. 394–406). New York: Routledge.
Harker, D. (2010). Two arguments for scientific realism unified. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,41(2), 192–202.
Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science,48(1), 19–49.
Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Fraassen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wray, K. B. (2011). Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
van der Merwe, R. K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism. J Gen Philos Sci (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09495-1