Advertisement

Cognitive Niche Construction and Extragenetic Information: A Sense of Purposefulness in Evolution

Abstract

My book Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning (2009) basically refers to all kinds of human hypothetical cognition, also of creative kind. During the research related to the preparation of that book I soon had the opportunity to examine the studies regarding the human process of continuous delegation and distribution of cognitive functions to the environment to lessen cognitive limitations, also and especially in the case of what has been called ‘manipulative abduction’. These design activities are closely related to the process of cognitive niche construction, which I will specifically address in this article. Niche construction should be regarded as a second major participant, after natural selection, in evolution. Indeed, by altering their environment and partly controlling some of the energy and matter fluxes in their ecosystems, organisms are capable of changing some of the natural selective pressures in their local environments (also affecting other ones). The question I plan to answer is the following: we need to hypothesize a fundamental role of non-genetic (or extragenetic) information in the evolution, but what kind of evolution could we obtain in this case? I will illustrate that in building various mediating structures, humans transform the environment and create cognitive niches. Thus, humans and other non-human animals become ecological engineers and chance seekers, involved in the processing, the alteration, and even the creation of external structures to reduce or suppress their cognitive limitations. Hence, this article will address a detailed analysis of the role of extragenetic information in evolution and what this process of selection selects for purposeful organisms, so niche-constructing ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    These aspects of abductive cognition have been illustrated in the recent books (Magnani 2009; 2017).

  2. 2.

    Sterelny (2003) proposed the expression “epistemic engineers”, adopted later on by Andy Clark, to refer to the human construction of cognitive niches in the growth of the so-called “extended” human mind.

  3. 3.

    On the transition in evolutionary epistemology from the adaptationist perspective to the non-adaptationist one see also Gontier (2010; 2018), Facoetti (2019), that illustrate further related non-adaptationist relevant topics such as phenotypic plasticity, developmental systems, epigenetic mechanisms, macroevolution, reticulate evolution through hybridization, symbiosis, symbiogenesis, infectious heredity, hybridization, and lateral gene transfer.

  4. 4.

    Attention was drawn for the first time to the idea of niche construction by famous researchers like Schrödinger, Mayr, Lewontin, Dawkins, and Waddington. Firstly in the field of physics and later on in the area of the theory of evolution itself. Waddington especially emphasized the influence generated by the organism development.

  5. 5.

    More examples, from birds to earthworms, are illustrated in Odling-Smee et al. (2003, Chs. 1–2).

  6. 6.

    Of course, humans have installed in natural environments a lot of cognitive items, but also animal behaviour offers many examples of niche construction activities. Interesting cases of animal cognitive niche construction (Odling-Smee et al. 2003, 60–67) are nests (made by birds, fishes, ants, bees, and termites—ant and termites greatly modify the mineral and organic composition of the surrounding soil and the local hydrology, and also consume a lot of terrestrial litter), shelters or sacs (made by spiders) burrows, pupal cases (made by butterflies), nursery environments for offspring, and detritus. Another final example refers to birds and mammals that damp out natural fluctuations in food availability by hoarding or storing food at appropriate times. Several more examples concerning birds, earthworms, and other organisms are illustrated in Odling-Smee et al. (2003, Chs. 1–2).

  7. 7.

    Gibson also contended that a niche can be seen as a set of affordances: an affordance refers to what the environment offers, provides, or furnishes. For instance, a chair ‘affords’ an opportunity for sitting, air for breathing, water for swimming, stairs for climbing, and so on. The concept of affordance has two positive consequences: first, it depicts the particular kind of relationship between an agent and its environment, and the interdependence between them. Second, this concept is also of help in further describing humans as chance seekers. Indeed, when human beings construct cognitive niches at the same time provide to themselves and to other individuals (and eventually to other non-human animals) interesting affordances (eventually new) that have significant cognitive (and also pragmatic) consequences. The relationships between abduction, affordances, and cognitive niches are illustrated in Magnani and Bardone (2008) and Magnani (2009, Ch. 6).

  8. 8.

    I have to note that in this article the attribute ‘extragenetic’ does not include epigenetic factors.

  9. 9.

    Some controversies are related to the fact that it is not always clear which are the modifications that originate cognitive niches capable of entering the evolutionary mechanisms. Consequently, it is questionable to which extent individual and collective actions can possess ecological outcomes, that is that reveal themselves not merely as aggregate and superficial changes. On this issue, cf. Sterelny (2005) and the criticisms made by Dawkins (2004). Interesting replies to these objections are illustrated in Laland et al. (2005).

  10. 10.

    Laland offers an explicative example of protocultural behaviour. It refers to Imo, the celebrated creator of potato- and wheat-washing, as an initiator of macaque culture (or “protoculture”): “In the 1960s, food washing seemed an unlikely natural behavior for monkeys. Hence, these behavior patterns were regarded as novel and intelligent. When the food-washing behavior spread, it was described as ‘preculture’ or ‘protoculture,’ the clear implication being that it could be regarded as an analog, or perhaps even a homolog, of human culture” (Laland and Hoppitt 2003, 154–155). Moreover, experimental studies have demonstrated that food washing is learned relatively quickly by monkeys and can become a ‘social’ widespread behaviour in a collective of animals.

  11. 11.

    This expression directly refers to the cognitive role that some structures built by humans can play. Artifacts such as diagrams, scientific tools typical of the laboratories but also books, buildings, monuments, religious objects, works of art, flags and symbols, essential databases, tools related to medical therapy, financial institutions, written laws, etc. are all constituents of cognitive niches that offer themselves as mediators of cognitive chances that can be adopted by humans that live in them. They mediate cognition: in semiotic terms, we can say that they provide plenty of signs that present potential meanings to the human interpreter. The role of these mediators in science is described in Magnani (2009) and in moral and violent behaviour in Magnani (2007b; 2011).

  12. 12.

    I should report here that what Herbert Simon called docility explains the human inclination to believe and adopt what indicated by ecological resources, which are made available thanks to cognitive niches. Indeed, according to Simon, humans are docile in the sense that their fitness is enhanced by “the tendency to depend on suggestions, recommendations, persuasion, and information obtained through social channels as a major basis for choice” (Simon 1993, 156).

  13. 13.

    The critical case of bacteria and their relationship with the second law of thermodynamics is illustrated in Magnani (2009, Ch. 5, Sect. 5.4.4).

  14. 14.

    Cf. Laland and Brown (2006).

  15. 15.

    It is well-known that contemporary human beings are continually involved in the problem of managing artifactual niches of various kinds: the so-called ‘ethics of technology’ is more or less directly related to the issue. This problem is, for example, treated in the book (Magnani 2007b).

  16. 16.

    The issue is also related to the description of the so-called ‘neural Darwinism’ introduced by Edelman.

  17. 17.

    I agree with the reviewer’s observation regarding the fact in this case random has to be intended in peculiar sense: genetic variation is interpreted during embryogenesis in the context of the environment and constructed niche. Thus, phenotypic variation is the result of gene evolution.

  18. 18.

    Also animals build cognitive niches (see also above footnote 6) that approximate the human ones in the following sense: studies in the field of animal cognition grant to many animals a kind of nonlinguistic cognitive activity we can fundamentally classify as model-based (that is distant from the cognitive functions supplied by human language (cf. Magnani 2009, Ch. 5). Their ecological niches become ‘cognitive’, when, for example, complex animal artifacts such as landmarks of caches for food are built, which are the result of ‘plastic’ and learned thinking activities that go beyond the cognitive endowments granted by innate endowments (cf. Magnani 2007a). It is remarkable to note that Carl Gust Jung intelligently stressed that when we see some animals making artifacts, we can acknowledge their cognitive value as an expression of what he speculatively called “natural culture”: “When the beaver fells trees and dams up a river, this is a performance conditioned by its differentiation. Its differentiation is a product of what one might call ‘natural culture,’ which functions as a transformer of energy” (Jung 1972, 42). Jung’s ideas about cognitive externalizations and artifacts in psychoanalysis are richly illustrated in Magnani (2018).

  19. 19.

    Cf. Zhang (1997), Hutchins (1995), Clark and Chalmers (1998), Wilson (2004), Magnani (2006), Magnani (2007a).

  20. 20.

    Cf. Zhang (1997), Gatti and Magnani (2005), Knuuttila and Honkela (2005). An illustration of the notion of representation proposed by the studies on dynamical systems—substantially antirepresentationalist—is given in Magnani (2009, Ch. 8, Sect. 8.5.2).

References

  1. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  2. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis,58(1), 7–19.

  3. Dawkins, R. (2004). Extended phenotype—But not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biology and Philosophy,19, 377–396.

  4. Day, R. L., Laland, K., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation. The niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine,46(1), 80–95.

  5. Edelman, G. M. (1989). The remembered present. New York: Basic Books.

  6. Edelman, G. M. (1993). Wider than the Sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  7. Edelman, G. M. (2006). Second nature. Brain science and human knowledge. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.

  8. Facoetti, M. (2019). United in diversity: An organic overview of non-adaptationist evolutionary epistemology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09452-y.

  9. Gatti, A., & Magnani, L. (2005). On the representational role of the environment and on the cognitive nature of manipulations. In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (Eds.), Computing, philosophy and cognition (pp. 227–242). London: College Publications.

  10. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

  11. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1998). Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  12. Gontier, N. (2010). Evolutionary epistemology as a scientific method: A new look upon the units and levels of evolution debate. Theory in Biosciences,129(2), 167–182.

  13. Gontier, N. (2018). On how epistemology and ontology converge through evolution: The applied evolutionary epistemological approach. In S. Wuppuluri & F. A. Doria (Eds.), The map and the territory: Exploring the foundations of science, thought and reality (pp. 533–569). Cham: Springer.

  14. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  15. Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics,37, 1555–1577.

  16. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  17. Jung, C. G. (1972). On psychic energy. In The collected works of C. G. Jung, trans. by R. F. C. Hull (Vol. 8, 2nd ed., pp. 3–66). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  18. Kaplan, H. K., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology,9(4), 155–185.

  19. Knuuttila, T., & Honkela, T. (2005). Questioning external and internal representations: The case of scientific models. In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (Eds.), Computing, philosophy and cognition (pp. 209–226). London: College Publications.

  20. Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology,15(3), 95–104.

  21. Laland, K. N., & Hoppitt, W. (2003). Do animals have culture? Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews,12(3), 150–159.

  22. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,23(1), 131–175.

  23. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2001). Cultural niche construction and human evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology,14(1), 22–33.

  24. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2005). On the breath and significance of niche construction: A reply to Griffiths, Okasha and Sterelny. Biology and Philosophy,20, 37–55.

  25. Lewontin, R. (1982). Organism and environment. In H. Plotkin (Ed.), Learning, development and culture (pp. 151–170). New York: Wiley.

  26. Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science. Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

  27. Magnani, L. (2005). Creativity and the disembodiment of mind. In Gervás, P., Pease, A., & Veale, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IJCAI-05 workshop on computational creativity, Edinburgh, UK (pp. 60–67), Madrid: Deparmento de Sistemas Informaticos y Programacion, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

  28. Magnani, L. (2006). Mimetic minds. Meaning formation through epistemic mediators and external representations. In A. Loula, R. Gudwin, & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Artificial cognition systems (pp. 327–357). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishers.

  29. Magnani, L. (2007a). Animal abduction. From mindless organisms to artifactual mediators. In L. Magnani & P. Li (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science, technology, and medicine (pp. 3–37). Berlin: Springer.

  30. Magnani, L. (2007b). Morality in a technological world. Knowledge as duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  31. Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Heidelberg: Springer.

  32. Magnani, L. (2011). Understanding violence. The intertwining of morality, religion, and violence: A philosophical stance. Heidelberg: Springer.

  33. Magnani, L. (2017). The abductive structure of scientific creativity. An essay on the ecology of cognition. Cham: Springer.

  34. Magnani, L. (2018). Ritual artifacts as symbolic habits. Open Information Science,1(2), 147–155.

  35. Magnani, L., & Bardone, E. (2008). Sharing representations and creating chances through cognitive niche construction. The role of affordances and abduction. In S. Iwata, Y. Oshawa, S. Tsumoto, et al. (Eds.), Communications and discoveries from multidisciplinary data (pp. 3–40). Berlin: Springer.

  36. Odling-Smee, F. J. (1988). The role of behavior in evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  37. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  38. Park, W. (2017). On Lorenzo Magnani’s manipulative abduction. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Handbook of model-based science (pp. 197–213). Basel: Springer.

  39. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

  40. Pinker, S. (2003). Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 16–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  41. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature. London: Bantam.

  42. Schrödinger, E. (1992). What is life? With “mind and matter” and “autobiographical sketches”. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Originally published in 1944.

  43. Seth, A. K., & Baars, B. J. (2005). Neural Darwinism and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition,14(1), 140–168.

  44. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,69(1), 99–118.

  45. Simon, H. A. (1993). Altruism and economics. American Economic Review,83(2), 157–161.

  46. Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world. The evolution of human cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

  47. Sterelny, K. (2005). Made by each other: Organisms and their environment. Biology and Philosophy,20, 21–36.

  48. Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), Primate models of hominid behavior (pp. 183–237). Albany: Suny Press.

  49. Turner, J. S. (2004). Extended phenotypes and extended organisms. Biology and Philosophy,19, 327–352.

  50. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  51. Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  52. Wuketits, F. M. (2006). Evolutionary epistemology: The non-adaptationist approach. In N. Gontier, J. P. Van Bendegem, & D. Aerts (Eds.), Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture: A non-adaptationist, systems theoretical approach (pp. 33–46). Dordrecht: Springer.

  53. Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science,21(2), 179–217.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Lorenzo Magnani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magnani, L. Cognitive Niche Construction and Extragenetic Information: A Sense of Purposefulness in Evolution. J Gen Philos Sci (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09494-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cognitive niches
  • Extragenetic information
  • Purposefulness in evolution
  • Distributed cognition
  • Incomplete information
  • Loosely Darwinian effects