Biological Individuality and Other Issues in Contemporary Philosophy of Biology (15 September 2018, University of Salzburg, Austria)

  • Martin S. WasmerEmail author

The topic of biological individuality has become a constant source of new work in philosophy of biology in the past decades (cf. Clarke 2010 for an overview and e.g. Lidgard and Nyhart 2017 for more recent work). Europe’s largest graduate conference in analytic philosophy, SOPhiA 2018 (hosted by the University of Salzburg), included a satellite workshop dedicated to the topic, which was aimed at bringing together mostly young researchers to exchange ideas and new approaches. The workshop was organized by Karim Baraghith (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany) and Gregor Greslehner (University of Salzburg, Austria, and University of Bordeaux, France).

Keynote speaker Thomas Reydon (Leibniz University Hannover, Germany) pointed out that describing biological things (more or less surprisingly) as individuals instead of kinds of entities has been one trend in making use of concepts of individuality in philosophy of biology. Recently Hermida (2016) and Mariscal and Doolittle (2018),...



  1. Clarke, E. (2010). The problem of biological individuality. Biological Theory, 5(4), 312–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Douglas, A. E., & Werren, J. H. (2016). Holes in the hologenome: Why host-microbe symbioses are not holobionts. MBio, 7(2), e02099-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dupré, J. (2012). Processes of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23(4), 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hermida, M. (2016). Life on Earth is an individual. Theory in Biosciences, 135(1–2), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kovac, L. (2000). Fundamental principles of cognitive biology. Evolution and Cognition, 6(1), 51–69.Google Scholar
  8. Kovac, L. (2015). Closing human evolution: Life in the ultimate age. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krakauer, D., Bertschinger, N., Olbrich, E., Ay, N., & Flack, J. C. (2014). The information theory of individuality. arXiv:1412.2447. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.
  10. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lidgard, S., & Nyhart, L. K. (Eds.). (2017). Biological individuality: Integrating scientific, philosophical, and historical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mariscal, C., & Doolittle, W. F. (2018). Life and life only: A radical alternative to life definitionism. Synthese. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.Google Scholar
  13. Millstein, R. L. (2009). Populations as individuals. Biological Theory, 4(3), 267–273. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Millstein, R. L. (2010). The concepts of population and metapopulation in evolutionary biology and ecology. In M. A. Bell, D. J. Futuyma, W. F. Eanes, & J. S. Levinton (Eds.), Evolution since Darwin: The first 150 years (pp. 61–86). Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  15. Millstein, R. L. (2015). Thinking about populations and races in time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 52, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monod, J. (1970). Le hasard et la nécessitée: Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Paris: LeSeuil.Google Scholar
  17. Moran, N. A., & Sloan, D. B. (2015). The hologenome concept: Helpful or hollow? PLoS Biology, 13(12), e1002311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicholson, D. J., & Dupré, J. (Eds.). (2018). Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nickles, T. (1981). What is a problem that we may solve it? Synthese, 47(1), 85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Queller, D. C., & Strassmann, J. E. (2009). Beyond society: The evolution of organismality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3143–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reydon, T., & Scholz, M. (2015). Searching for Darwinism in generalized Darwinism. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 66(2015), 561–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenberg, A. (2006). Darwinian reductionism, or, how to stop worrying and love molecular biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stegenga, J. (2016). Population pluralism and natural selection. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zilber-Rosenberg, I., & Rosenberg, E. (2008). Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: The hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 32(5), 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS)Leibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations