Newton, Goethe and the Alleged Underdetermination of Ray Optics

Article

Abstract

Did Goethe devise an empirically viable theory of classical ray optics? Or can we at least make use of his ideas to propose one? And if so, does this confront us with an intriguing case of theory underdetermination? In this paper, which is mainly a comment on the recent work of Olaf Müller, I shall address these three questions and argue for ‘no, yes, no’. This is in contrast to Müller, who has recently launched a vivid defense of Goethe-style ray optics (Müller in “Mehr Licht. Goethe mit Newton im Streit um die Farben.” Fischer, Frankfurt a.M., 2015a; Z Philos Forsch 69(4):569–573, 2015b; Z Philos Forsch 69(4):588–598, 2015c; Br J Hist Philos 24(2):322–346, 2016). Müller aims to give an almost positive answer to all three questions: ‘perhaps, yes, yes’. My overall line of argument will be that the rather restricted regime of classical geometrical optics of spectral colors (or ray optics, for short) allows at best for a weak form of transient theory underdetermination that, in turn and more straightforwardly, also allows for a structuralist reading in terms of two structurally equivalent formulations of one and the same theory. However, extending any of the rivaling models of ray optics other than Newton’s beyond the mentioned regime and embedding them into physics in total—especially in view of thermodynamics—leads to a contradiction. Hence, Newton’s theory is confirmed as the only consistent theoretical interpretation of ray optics.

Keywords

Newton Goethe Ray optics Color theory Theory underdetermination Structural realism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer of this journal for pressing me on the issue of transient underdetermination.

References

  1. Falkenburg, B. (2015). Wohin fliegt die Eule der Minerva? Über die Verkehrung von Licht und Finsternis. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 69(4), 574–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lampert, T. (2017). Underdetermination and provability; a reply to Olaf Müller. British Journal for the History of Philosophy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2016.1255177.Google Scholar
  3. Lyre, H. (2004). Lokale Symmetrien und Wirklichkeit. Eine naturphilosophische Studie über Eichtheorien und Strukturenrealismus. Paderborn: mentis.Google Scholar
  4. Lyre, H. (2011). Is structural underdetermination possible? Synthese, 180(2), 235–247.Google Scholar
  5. Müller, O. (2015a). Mehr Licht. Goethe mit Newton im Streit um die Farben. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.Google Scholar
  6. Müller, O. (2015b). Précis zu “Mehr Licht. Goethe und Newton im Streit um die Farben”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 69(4), 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Müller, O. (2015c). Weltgemacht oder hausgemacht? Plädoyer für die Verschiedenheit zweier empirisch äquivalenter Theorien. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 69(4), 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Müller, O. (2016). Prismatic equivalence—A new case of underdetermination: Goethe vs. Newton on the prism experiments. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24(2), 322–346.Google Scholar
  9. Nussbaumer, I. (2008). Zur Farbenlehre. Entdeckung der unordentlichen Spektren. Wien: Edition Splitter.Google Scholar
  10. Quine, W. V. O. (1975). On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis, 9, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rang, M. (2015). Phänomenologie komplementärer Spektren. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
  12. Rang, M., & Johannes, G.-E. (2009). Komplementäre Spektren. Experimente mit einer Spiegel-Spalt-Blende. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht, 62(4), 227–231.Google Scholar
  13. Strobach, N. (2015). Goethe und Kroethe. Olaf Müllers Wissenschaftstheorie der Farbenlehre im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 69(4), 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations