Philosophy of Science Between the Natural Sciences, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities: Introduction

  • Christian J. Feldbacher-Escamilla
  • Alexander Gebharter
  • Gerhard Schurz
Article

Abstract

This introduction provides a detailed summary of all papers of the special issue on the second conference of the German Society for Philosophy of Science: GWP.2016.

Keywords

Philosophy of science GWP.2016 Natural necessities Generalised Darwinism Scientific change 

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1983). What is a law of nature?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christian, A., Feldbacher-Escamilla, C. J., & Gebharter, A. (2017). The second international conference of the German society for philosophy of science (GWP.2016), 8–11 March 2016. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48(2), 289–291. doi:10.1007/s10838-016-9358-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, J., & Callender, C. (2009). A better best system account of lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145(1), 1–34. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9389-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy., 22(4), 547–563. doi:10.1007/s10539-006-9028-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Foster, J. (1983). Induction, explanation and natural necessity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 83(1), 87–101. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/83.1.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kyburg, H., & Teng, C. M. (2001). The theory of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lycan, W. G. (2006). Real conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Sankey, H. (1997). Induction and natural kinds. Principia, 1(2), 239–254.Google Scholar
  10. Schurz, G. (2008). The meta-inductivist’s winning strategy in the prediction game: a new approach to Hume’s problem. Philosophy of Science, 75(3), 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thorn, P. D. (2017). On the preference for more specific reference classes. Synthese, 194(6), 2025–2051. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1035-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Unterhuber, M., Gebharter, A., & Schurz, G. (2014). Philosophy of science in Germany, 1992–2012: Survey-based overview and quantitative analysis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 45(1), 71–160. English.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian J. Feldbacher-Escamilla
    • 1
  • Alexander Gebharter
    • 1
  • Gerhard Schurz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Duesseldorf Center for Logic and Philosophy of Science (DCLPS)University of DuesseldorfDuesseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations