Extended Mechanistic Explanations: Expanding the Current Mechanistic Conception to Include More Complex Biological Systems
- 473 Downloads
Mechanistic accounts of explanation have recently found popularity within philosophy of science. Presently, we introduce the idea of an extended mechanistic explanation, which makes explicit room for the role of environment in explanation. After delineating Craver and Bechtel’s (2007) account, we argue this suggestion is not sufficiently robust when we take seriously the mechanistic environment and modeling practices involved in studying contemporary complex biological systems. Our goal is to extend the already profitable mechanistic picture by pointing out the importance of the mechanistic environment. It is our belief that extended mechanistic explanations, or mechanisms that take into consideration the temporal sequencing of the interplay between the mechanism and the environment, allow for mechanistic explanations regarding a broader group of scientific phenomena.
KeywordsMechanism Explanation Complex systems Mechanistic environment
We would like to thank a great many people who have been instrumental in crafting this paper. First, we would like to thank Roberta Millstein for her ability to reread a paper countless times without complaint. We thank our many reviewers who were both diligent and helpful, a combination not praised enough. Thanks to James Griesemer and the Griesemer–Millstein Philosophy of Biology Lab for continual discussion, support, and helpful tips. Our thanks to Elliot Sober and the 2014 participants of POBAM who went out of their way to help hone our arguments. Finally, we give our appreciation to countless other conference and workshop attendees that have helped our project progress, including those at the Canadian Philosophical Association, the American Philosophical Association, and the Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies at the University of Idaho.
- Bechtel, W. (2006). Discovering cell mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W. (2009). Decomposing, recomposing, and situating circadian mechanisms: Three tasks in developing mechanistic explanations. In H. Leitgeb & A. Hieke (Eds.), Reduction and elimination in philosophy of mind and philosophy of neuroscience (pp. 173–186). Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar
- Escherichia coli. (2013). Resource Document. CDC National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/index.html. Accessed on 18 Sept. 2013.
- Kandel, E., Schwartz, E., & Jessel, T. M. (1991). Principles of neuroscience. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Nealson, K. H., Platt, T., & Hastings, J. W. (1970). Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. Journal of Bacteriology, 104(1), 313–322.Google Scholar
- Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, L., & Sober, E. (2007). Epiphenomenalism—the Do’s and the Don’ts. In G. Wolters & P. Machamer (Eds.), Studies in causality: Historical and contemporary (pp. 235–264). Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Reengineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar