Journal of Electronic Testing

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 139–150 | Cite as

Application-Based Analysis of Register File Criticality for Reliability Assessment in Embedded Microprocessors

  • Felipe Restrepo-Calle
  • Sergio Cuenca-Asensi
  • Antonio Martínez-Álvarez
  • Eduardo Chielle
  • Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt
Article

Abstract

There is an increasing concern to reduce the cost and overheads during the development of reliable systems. Selective protection of most critical parts of the systems represents a viable solution to obtain a high level of reliability at a fraction of the cost. In particular to design a selective fault mitigation strategy for processor-based systems, it is mandatory to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable registers in the register file as best candidates to be protected (hardened). This paper presents an application-based metric to estimate the criticality of each register from the microprocessor register file in microprocessor-based systems. The proposed metric relies on the combination of three different criteria based on common features of executed applications. The applicability and accuracy of our proposal have been evaluated in a set of applications running in different microprocessors. Results show a significant improvement in accuracy compared to previous approaches and regardless of the underlying architecture.

Keywords

Embedded systems Metrics Microprocessors Reliability 

References

  1. 1.
    Azambuja JR, Pagliarini S, Rosa L, Lima Kastensmidt F (2011) Exploring the limitations of software-based techniques in SEE fault coverage. J Electron Test 27(4):541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benso A, Chiusano S, Prinetto P, Tagliaferri L (2000) A C/C++ source to source compiler for dependable applications, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), pp. 71–78Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergaoui S, Vanhauwaert P, Leveugle R (2010) A new critical variable analysis in processor-based systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 57(4):1992–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chapman K (2003) PicoBlaze KCPSM3. 8-bit Micro Controller for Spartan-3, Virtex-II and Virtex-II, Xilinx LtdGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chielle E, Azambuja JR, Barth RS, Almeida F, Lima Kastensmidt F (2013) Evaluating selective redundancy in data-flow software-based techniques. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 60(4):2768–2775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuenca-Asensi S, Martínez-Álvarez A, Restrepo-Calle F, Palomo FR, Guzmán-Miranda H, Aguirre MA (2011) A novel co-design approach for soft errors mitigation in embedded systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 58(3):1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giacinto P, Wang N, Kalbarczyk Z, Patel S, Iyer R (2005) An experimental study of soft error in microprocessors. IEEE MICRO 25(6):30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goloubeva O, Rebaudengo M, Reorda MS, Violante M (2006) Software-Implemented Hardware Fault Tolerance (Vol. XIV). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamdioui S, Nicolaidis M, Gizopoulos D, Grasset A, Guido G, Bonnot P (2013) Reliability challenges of real-time systems in forthcoming technology nodes. Proc. Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE '13), EDA Consortium, Pp. 129–134Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. M. O. S. S. (2010) Hangout and S. Jan, TheMinimips Project [Online]. Availiable: http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/ web/minimips/overview 2010
  11. 11.
    Lee J, Shrivastava A (2011) Static analysis of register file vulnerability. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Design Integr Circuits Syst 30(4):607–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindoso A, Entrena L, San Millan E, Cuenca-Asensi S, Martínez-Álvarez A, Restrepo-Calle F (2012) A co-design approach for SET mitigation in embedded systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 59(4):1034–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martínez-Álvarez A, Cuenca-Asensi S, Restrepo-Calle F, Palomo Pinto FR, Guzmán-Miranda H, Aguirre MA (2012) Compiler-directed soft error mitigation for embedded systems. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Computing 9(2):159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martínez-Álvarez A, Restrepo-Calle F, Vivas Tejuelo LA, Cuenca-Asensi S (2013) Fault tolerant embedded systems design by multi-objective optimization. Expert Systems Appl 40(17):6813–6822Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Mukherjee SS, Weaver C, Emer J, Reinhardt SK, Austin T (2003) A systematic methodology to compute the architectural vulnerability factors for a high-performance microprocessor, in Proc. 36th Int. Symp. on Microarchitecture., MICRO-36. pp. 29–40Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nicolaidis M (2005) Design for soft error mitigation. IEEE Trans Device Mater Rel 5(3):405–418Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicolaidis M (2011) Soft Errors in Modern Electronic Systems. 1st Ed. Frontiers in Electronic Testing Series, vol. 41. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicolescu B, Savaria Y, Velazco R (2004) Software detection mechanisms providing full coverage against single bit-flip faults. IEEE Trans NuclSci 51(6):3510–3518Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oh N, Shirvani PP, McCluskey EJ (2002) Control-flow checking by software signatures. IEEE Trans Rel 51(1):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pattabiraman K, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK (2005) Application-based metrics for strategic placement of detectors,“ in Proc. 11th Pacific Rim Int. Symp. on Dependable Computing, pp.8, 12–14Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Portela-Garcia M, Lindoso A, Entrena L, Garcia-Valderas M, Lopez-Ongil C, Marroni N, Pianta B, Bolzani Poehls L, Vargas F (2012) Evaluating the effectiveness of a software-based technique under SEEs using FPGA-based fault injection approach. J Electron Test 28(6):777–789Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pratt B, Caffrey M, Carroll JF, Graham P, Morgan K, Wirthlin M (2008) Fine-grain SEU mitigation for FPGAs using partial TMR. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 55(4):2274–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rehman S, Shafique M, Kriebel F, Henkel J (2011) Reliable software for unreliable hardware: embedded code generation aiming at reliability, In Proc.7th IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis (CODES + ISSS '11), pp. 237–246Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Restrepo-Calle F, Martínez-Álvarez A, Cuenca-Asensi S, Jimeno A (2013) Selective SWIFT-R: a flexible software-based technique for soft error mitigation in low-cost embedded systems. J Electron Test 29(6):825–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruano O, Maestro JA, Reviriego P (2009) A methodology for automatic insertion of selective TMR in digital circuits affected by SEUs. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 56(4):2091–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sridharan V, Kaeli DR (2008) Quantifying Software Vulnerability, in Proc. Workshop Radiation Effects and Fault Tolerance in Nanometer Tech. WREFT, pp. 323–328Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vargas F, Rocha CA, Farina A, de Alecrim AA Jr (2007) Embedded signature monitoring based on profiling deployed software technique. IEEE Int East–west Des Test Symp, Yerevan, Armenia, pp. 230–236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felipe Restrepo-Calle
    • 1
  • Sergio Cuenca-Asensi
    • 2
  • Antonio Martínez-Álvarez
    • 2
  • Eduardo Chielle
    • 3
  • Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Systems and Industrial EngineeringUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Computer Technology DepartmentUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Informática, PPGC and PGMICROUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations