Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 691–709 | Cite as

Female Earnings and the Returns to Spousal Education Over Time

  • Nicholas A. JollyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 186 Downloads

Abstract

Using U.S. Census data from 1960 to 2000 and American Community Survey data from 2010, this paper estimates the relationship between the husband’s educational attainment and his wife’s annual labor earnings. For full-time working wives, each additional year of completed schooling by the husband was associated with a 2% increase in his wife’s earnings. The returns to spousal education were larger when the couple worked in the same occupation. The estimated relationship has increased slightly since 1970. This increase was larger for younger wives. These results are consistent with cross-productivity and documented increases in educational homogamy.

Keywords

Marriage Human capital Female earnings Assortative mating 

JEL Classification

J12 J24 J31 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Yilan Liu for motivating this study and providing research assistance. Gwendolyn Davis, Delia Furtado, Marina Gindelsky, Peter Groothuis, Richard Hill, two anonymous referees, the editor, and seminar participants at Marquette University, DePaul University, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, and the Western Economic Association International 2017 Annual Meeting provided helpful comments on earlier drafts. All errors are my own.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study uses publicly available, secondary data from the US Census and American Community Survey. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. Amin, S., & Jepsen, L. (2005). The impact of wife’s education on her husband’s earnings in Malaysia. The Journal of Economics, 31(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, S., & Jepsen, L. (2012). The benefits of a husband’s education to his wife’s earnings in Malaysia. In J. Jaworski (Ed.), Advances in sociology research (Vol. 12). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, M. J. (2006). More power to the pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women’s life cycle labor supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 289–320. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25098791.
  4. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831130.
  5. Benham, L. (1974). Benefits of women’s education within marriage. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S57–S71. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829991.
  6. Bernardi, F. (1999). Does the husband matter? Married women and employment in Italy. European Sociological Review, 15(3), 285–300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/522732.
  7. Bernasco, W., de Graaf P. M., & Ultee, W. C. (1998). Coupled careers: effects of spouse’s resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 15–31. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/522478.
  8. Dribe, M., & Nystedt, P. (2013). Educational homogamy and gender-specific earnings: Sweden, 1990–2009. Demography, 50(4), 1197–1216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42920551.
  9. Eika, L., Mogstad, M., & Zafar, B. (2018). Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. Journal of Political Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1086/702018. (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furtado, D. (2012). Human capital and interethnic marriage decisions. Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 82–93.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00345.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furtado, D. (2016). Fertility responses of high-skilled native women to immigrant inflows. Demography, 53(1), 27–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0444-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldin, C. (1992). The meaning of college in the lives of American women: The past one-hundred years. NBER Working Paper, Number 4099.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w4099.
  13. Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034606.
  14. Goldin, C., & Mitchell, J. (2017). The new life cycle of women’s employment: Disappearing humps, sagging middles, expanding tops. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 161–182. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44133955.
  15. Gonalons-Pons, P., & Schwartz, C. R. (2017). Trends in economic homogamy: sorting into marriage or changes in the division of labor? Demography, 54(3), 985–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0576-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groothuis, P., & Gabriel, P. E. (2010). Positive assortative mating and spouses as complementary factors of production: A theory of labour augmentation. Applied Economics, 42(9), 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701721141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang, C., Li, H., Liu, P. W., & Zhang, J. (2009). Why does spousal education matter for earnings? Assortative mating and cross-productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 633–652. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/644746.
  18. Jepsen, L. K. (2005). The relationship between wife’s education and husband’s earnings: Evidence from 1960–2000. Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-005-0710-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, C., & Sakamoto, A. (2017). Women’s progress for men’s gain? Gender-specific changes in the return to education as measured by family standard of living, 1990 to 2009–2011. Demography, 54(5), 1743–1772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0601-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lam, D. (1988). Marriage markets and assortative mating with household public goods: Theoretical results and empirical implications. Journal of Human Resources, 23(4), 462–486.  https://doi.org/10.2307/145809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lam, D., & Schoeni, R. F. (1993). Effects of family background on earnings and returns to schooling: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 710–740. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138745.
  22. Lam, D., & Schoeni, R. F. (1994). Family ties and labor markets in the United States and Brazil. Journal of Human Resources, 29(4), 1235–1258.  https://doi.org/10.2307/146139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy, F. & Murnane, R. J. (1992). U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1333–1381. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2728062.
  24. Liu, P. W., & Zhang, J. (1999). Assortative mating versus the cross-productivity effect. Applied Economics Letters, 1999(6), 523–525.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135048599352862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loh, E. S. (1996). Productivity difference and the marriage wage premium for white males. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 566–589.  https://doi.org/10.2307/146266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mano, Y., & Yamamura, E. (2011). Effects of husband’s education and family structure on labor force participation and married Japanese women’s earnings. The Japanese Economy, 38(3), 71–91.  https://doi.org/10.2753/JES1097-203X380303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 15–32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095670.
  28. Nakosteen, R., & Zimmer, M. A. (2001). Spouse selection and earnings: Evidence of marital sorting. Economic Inquiry, 39(2), 201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neuman, S., & Ziderman, A. (1992). Benefits of women’s education within marriage: results for Israel in a dual labor market context. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(2), 413–424. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1154203.
  30. Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Meyer, E., Pacas, J., et al. (2018). IPUMS USA: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative mating from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42(4), 621–646.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scully, G. W. (1979). Mullahs, muslims, and marital sorting. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 1139–1143. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833086.
  33. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30033716.
  34. Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). The productivity gains of marriage: Effects of spousal education on own productivity across market sectors in Brazil. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(3), 633–650.  https://doi.org/10.1086/452294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Bavel, J., Schwartz, C. R., & Esteve, A. (2018). The reversal of the gender gap in education and its consequences for family life. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 341–360.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Welch, F. (1974). Benefits of women’s education within marriage: Comment. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S72–S75. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829992.
  37. Wong, Y. C. (1986). Entrepreneurship, marriage, and earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 639–699.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1924531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations