Female Earnings and the Returns to Spousal Education Over Time
- 186 Downloads
Using U.S. Census data from 1960 to 2000 and American Community Survey data from 2010, this paper estimates the relationship between the husband’s educational attainment and his wife’s annual labor earnings. For full-time working wives, each additional year of completed schooling by the husband was associated with a 2% increase in his wife’s earnings. The returns to spousal education were larger when the couple worked in the same occupation. The estimated relationship has increased slightly since 1970. This increase was larger for younger wives. These results are consistent with cross-productivity and documented increases in educational homogamy.
KeywordsMarriage Human capital Female earnings Assortative mating
JEL ClassificationJ12 J24 J31
I thank Yilan Liu for motivating this study and providing research assistance. Gwendolyn Davis, Delia Furtado, Marina Gindelsky, Peter Groothuis, Richard Hill, two anonymous referees, the editor, and seminar participants at Marquette University, DePaul University, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, and the Western Economic Association International 2017 Annual Meeting provided helpful comments on earlier drafts. All errors are my own.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
This study uses publicly available, secondary data from the US Census and American Community Survey. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- Amin, S., & Jepsen, L. (2005). The impact of wife’s education on her husband’s earnings in Malaysia. The Journal of Economics, 31(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Amin, S., & Jepsen, L. (2012). The benefits of a husband’s education to his wife’s earnings in Malaysia. In J. Jaworski (Ed.), Advances in sociology research (Vol. 12). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bailey, M. J. (2006). More power to the pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women’s life cycle labor supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 289–320. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25098791.
- Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831130.
- Benham, L. (1974). Benefits of women’s education within marriage. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S57–S71. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829991.
- Bernardi, F. (1999). Does the husband matter? Married women and employment in Italy. European Sociological Review, 15(3), 285–300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/522732.
- Bernasco, W., de Graaf P. M., & Ultee, W. C. (1998). Coupled careers: effects of spouse’s resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 15–31. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/522478.
- Dribe, M., & Nystedt, P. (2013). Educational homogamy and gender-specific earnings: Sweden, 1990–2009. Demography, 50(4), 1197–1216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42920551.
- Goldin, C. (1992). The meaning of college in the lives of American women: The past one-hundred years. NBER Working Paper, Number 4099. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4099.
- Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034606.
- Goldin, C., & Mitchell, J. (2017). The new life cycle of women’s employment: Disappearing humps, sagging middles, expanding tops. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 161–182. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44133955.
- Huang, C., Li, H., Liu, P. W., & Zhang, J. (2009). Why does spousal education matter for earnings? Assortative mating and cross-productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 633–652. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/644746.
- Lam, D., & Schoeni, R. F. (1993). Effects of family background on earnings and returns to schooling: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 710–740. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138745.
- Levy, F. & Murnane, R. J. (1992). U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1333–1381. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2728062.
- Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 15–32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095670.
- Nakosteen, R., & Zimmer, M. A. (2001). Spouse selection and earnings: Evidence of marital sorting. Economic Inquiry, 39(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neuman, S., & Ziderman, A. (1992). Benefits of women’s education within marriage: results for Israel in a dual labor market context. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(2), 413–424. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1154203.
- Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Meyer, E., Pacas, J., et al. (2018). IPUMS USA: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS.Google Scholar
- Scully, G. W. (1979). Mullahs, muslims, and marital sorting. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 1139–1143. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833086.
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30033716.
- Welch, F. (1974). Benefits of women’s education within marriage: Comment. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S72–S75. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829992.