Advertisement

Financial Compensation for Intra-Familial Long-Term Care and Childcare in Germany

  • Nataliya KusaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The study examines whether respondents believe that long-term care provided by children for elderly parents and grandparental childcare should be monetarily compensated, and how these results vary by different groups of respondents. Based on a representative survey, the author shows that while 79% of subjects support compensation for long-term care, only 38% of subjects support compensation for grandparental childcare. Older subjects are more likely to accept monetary compensation for both long-term care and grandparental childcare. It is puzzling that being a female does not by itself explain the differences in acceptance, even though females are much more actively involved in all types of time transfers. Implications of the results and directions for future research are suggested.

Keywords

Equity principle Grandparental childcare Intergenerational transfers Long-term care 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Nataliya Kusa declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This analysis is based on the representative GESIS Panel conducted by Leibniz Institute for social sciences in Mannheim, Germany.

Animal and Human Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Arrondel, L., & Masson, A. (2001). Family transfers involving three generations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103(3), 415–443.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00253.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1086/260266.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G., & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153–1189.Google Scholar
  4. Bengtson, V. L., & Lowenstein, A. (Eds.). (2003). Global aging and challenges to families (life course and aging) (1st ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1985). The strategic bequest motive. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1045–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1086/298126.Google Scholar
  6. Bettio, F., & Verashchagina, A. (2010). Long-term care for the elderly: provisions and providers in 33 European countries. Luxembourg: EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment.Google Scholar
  7. Boerner, K., & Reinhardt, J. P. (2003). Giving while in need: support provided by disabled older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B(5), 297–304.Google Scholar
  8. Cascio, E. U., Haider, S. J., & Nielsen, H. S. (2015). The effectiveness of policies that promote labor force participation of women with children: A collection of national studies. Labour Economics, 36, 64–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.08.002.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., & Hunt, R. G. (1997). Testing the effects of vertical and horizontal collectivism: a study of rewards allocation preferences in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 23–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197281003.Google Scholar
  10. Coall, D. A., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Grandparental investment: Past, present, and future. Behavioral and Brain Science, 33(1), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991105.Google Scholar
  11. Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. OECD Health Policy Studies: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 508–546.  https://doi.org/10.1086/261470.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, D., & Rank, M. R. (1992). Inter-vivos transfers and intergenerational exchange. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 305–314.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2109662.Google Scholar
  14. Eurobarometer (2007). Health and long-term care in the European Union. Special Eurobarometer 283. European Commission.Google Scholar
  15. European Union (2012). Long-term care of the elderly: provisions and providers in 33 European countries. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  16. Folk, K. F. (1994). For love or money: Costs of child care by relatives. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 15(3), 243–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353630.Google Scholar
  17. Gans, D., Silverstein, M., & Lowenstein, A. (2010). Do religious children care more and provide more care to older parents? A study of filial norms and behaviors across five nations. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(4), 633–638.Google Scholar
  18. GESIS (2016) GESIS Panel—standard edition. GESIS data archive, Cologne. ZA5665 Data file Version 17.0.0.  https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12709.
  19. Gray, A. (2005). The changing availability of grandparents as carers and its implications for childcare policy in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 34(4), 557–577.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279405009153.Google Scholar
  20. Groneck, M. (2016). Bequests and informal long-term care: Evidence from HRS exit interviews. Journal of Human Resources.  https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.2.1214-6839r1.Google Scholar
  21. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.Google Scholar
  22. Hank, K., & Buber, I. (2009). Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: Findings From the 2004 survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 30(1), 53–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08322627.Google Scholar
  23. Herlofson, K., Hagestad, G., Slagsvold, B., & Sørensen A.-M. (2011). Intergenerational family responsibility and solidarity in Europe. Multilinks deliverable 4.3. NOVA.Google Scholar
  24. Husmann, M. (2010). Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen bei grenzüberschreitender Haushalts- und Pflegearbeit. In K. Scheiwe & J. Krawietz (Eds.), Transnationale Sorgearbeit. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und gesellschaftliche Praxis (pp. 29–56). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  25. Inglehart, R. (2008). Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1), 130–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701834747.Google Scholar
  26. Jappens, M., & Van Bavel, J. (2012). Regional family norms and child care by grandparents in Europe. Demographic Research, 27, 85–120.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.4.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728–741.Google Scholar
  29. Kluzer, S., Redecker, C., & Centeno, C. (2010). Long-term care challenges in an ageing society: The role of ICT and migrants results from a study on England, Germany, Italy and Spain. JRC Working Papers JRC58533, Joint Research Centre (Seville site). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239.  https://doi.org/10.1257/002205103771800013.Google Scholar
  31. Laferrere, A., & Wolff, F. C. (2006). Microeconomic models of family transfers. In S. C. Kolm & J. Mercier-Ytier (Eds.), Handbook on the economics on giving, reciprocity and altruism (Vol. 2, pp. 889–969). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  32. Leopold, T., Raab, M., & Engelhardt, H. (2014). The transition to parent care: Costs, commitments and caregiver selection among children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 300–318.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12099.Google Scholar
  33. Molina, J. A. (2015). Caring within the family: Reconciling work and family life. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-015-9441-8.Google Scholar
  34. National Research Council (2001). Preparing for an aging world: The Case for Cross National Research. Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World. Committee on Population and Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/10120.
  35. Norton, E. C., Nicholas, L. H., & Huang, S. S. (2013). Informal care and inter-vivos transfers: Results from the national longitudinal survey of mature women. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 14(2), 377–400.  https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0062.Google Scholar
  36. OECD (2008). What are equivalence scales? Paris. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf.
  37. Posadas, J., & Vidal-Fernandez, M. (2013). Grandparents’ childcare and female labor force participation. IZA Journal of Labor Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-2-14.Google Scholar
  38. Presser, H. B. (1989). Some economic complexities of child care provided by grandmothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(3), 581–591.  https://doi.org/10.2307/35215.Google Scholar
  39. Rossi el Corso, A., & Lanz, M. (2012). Felt obligation and the family life cycle: A study on intergenerational relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1196–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.725131.Google Scholar
  40. Rubin, R. M., & White-Means, S. I. (2009). Informal caregiving: dilemmas of sandwiched caregivers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 252–267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9155-x.Google Scholar
  41. Schmidt, M., & Schneekloth, U. (2011). Abschlussbericht zur Studie “Wirkungen des Pflege-Weiterentwicklungsgesetzes”. Berlin: Bericht zu den Repräsentativerhebungen im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit.Google Scholar
  42. Schokkaert, E., & Capeau, B. (1991). Interindividual differences in opinions about distributive justice. Kyklos, 44(3), 325–345.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1991.tb01758.x.Google Scholar
  43. Sieweck, J. (2011). Branchenreport Erbschaften 2011. Cologne: BBE Media.Google Scholar
  44. Stark, O. (1995). Altruism and beyond: an economic analysis of transfers and exchanges within families and groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Stum, M. S. (2001). Financing long-term care: examining decision outcomes and systemic influences from the perspective of family members. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(1), 25–53.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009440619997.Google Scholar
  46. Tobío, C., Tomás, S. A., Gómez, V., & Paloma, T. M. (2010). Caring for others: A challenge for the 21st century. Social Studies Collection No. 28. Barcelona: Fundación “La Caixa”.Google Scholar
  47. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfland, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118.Google Scholar
  48. Triantafillou, J., Naiditch, M., Repkova, K., & Stiehr, K. et al. (2010). Informal care in the long-term care system. Interlinks-Project Executive Summary. http://interlinks.euro.centre.org/sites/default/files/WP5%20Informal%20care_ExecutiveSummary_FINAL_1.pdf.
  49. Vandell, D. L., McCartney, K., Owen, M. T., Booth, C., & Clarke, A. (2004). Variations in child care by grandparents during the first three years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 375–381.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00375.x.Google Scholar
  50. Wheelock, J., & Jones, K. (2002). ‘Grandparents are the next best thing’: informal childcare for working parents in urban Britain. Journal of Social Policy, 31(3), 441–463.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279402006657.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations