Advertisement

Resource Well-Being among Family Child Care Business Owners

  • Yoko MimuraEmail author
  • Yi Cai
  • Holli Tonyan
  • Joan Koonce
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Family child care, a paid child care service operated out of a care provider’s home, is a common child care choice for working parents. While studies show positive associations between providers’ income and care quality, little is known about their resource management and perceived resource well-being. Using surveys and interviews, this study explored the association between household income and overall perceived resource well-being among seven family child care providers in the Los Angeles, California area. The surveys offered providers’ demographic information and characteristics about their child care businesses. The analysis of the interview data identified four resource well-being themes regarding perceptions about: past and present economic situations, demands on time, contributions providers’ family members make to support the business functions, and quality and availability of community resources. The findings suggest household income predicts little about how providers perceive their overall resource well-being. Understanding income as only a part of resource management may better elucidate links between income and child care quality. Discussions include implications for financial counselors and planners.

Keywords

Family-owned businesses Family resource management Income Perceived resource well-being Women’s employment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The NIH Research Infrastructure in Minority Institutions (RIMI) from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (Grant No. P20MD003938) for supporting Yoko Mimura, Tom Cai, and Holli Tonyan to write this paper. California State University Northridge’s Faculty Development Probationary Faculty Support Program also supported Yoko Mimura to have additional time to write this paper. Provost Harold Hellenbrand and Dean Stella Theodoulo at California State University Northridge supported Holli Tonyan in collecting the data used for this study. We thank the child care providers who generously participated in this research, the students in the California State University Northridge Infancy and Early Childhood Lab who helped conduct this research, and the collaboration with the Child Care Resource Center for helping us study family child care providers. We presented an earlier version of this study at the American Council on Consumer Interest annual meeting at Clearwater Beach, Florida, in 2015.

Funding

This study was funded by the NIH Research Infrastructure in Minority Institutions (RIMI) from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (Grant No. P20MD003938).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Yoko Mimura declares that she has no conflict of interest. Tom Cai declares that he has no conflict of interest. Holli Tonyan declares that she has no conflict of interest. Joan Koonce declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals participating in this study.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006.Google Scholar
  2. Angel, R. J., Frisco, M., Angel, J. L., & Chiriboga, D. A. (2003). Financial strain and health among elderly Mexican-origin individuals. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(4), 536–551.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1519798.Google Scholar
  3. Arber, S., Fenn, K., & Meadows, R. (2014). Subjective financial well-being, income and health inequalities in mid and later life in Britain. Social Science & Medicine, 100, 12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.016.Google Scholar
  4. Burchinal, M., Howes, C., & Kontos, S. (2002). Structural predictors of child care quality in child care homes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 87–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00132-1.Google Scholar
  5. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Child Care Resource Center. (2018). The decline in the number of child care homes. Retrieved June 26, 2018 from https://ccrc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=45e2842b1e0649f4863b3fe9468c58dc.
  7. Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1988). Family resource management: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014411319119.Google Scholar
  9. Doherty, G., Forer, B., Lero, D. S., Goelman, H., & LaGrange, A. (2006). Predictors of quality in family child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(3), 296–312.Google Scholar
  10. Forry, N., Iruka, I., Tout, K., Torquati, J., Susman-Stillman, A., Bryant, D., & Daneri, M. P. (2013). Predictors of quality and child outcomes in family child care settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 893–904.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.05.006.Google Scholar
  11. Goldsmith, E. B. (2010). Resource management for individuals and families (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  12. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625.Google Scholar
  13. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.Google Scholar
  14. Harding Weaver, R. (2002). Predictors of quality and commitment in family child care: Provider education, personal resources, and support. Early Education and Development, 13(3), 265–282.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1303_2.Google Scholar
  15. Hazelrigg, L., & Hardy, M. (1997). Perceived income adequacy among older adults: Issues of conceptualization and measurement, with an analysis of data. Research on Aging, 19, 69–108.Google Scholar
  16. Helburn, S., & Howes, C. (1996). Child care cost and quality. The Future of Children, 6(2), 62–82.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1602419.Google Scholar
  17. Helburn, S. W., Morris, J. R., & Modigliani, K. (2002). Family child care finances and their effect on quality and incentives. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(4), 512–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00188-6.Google Scholar
  18. Henly, J. R., & Lyons, S. (2000). The negotiation of child care and employment demands among low-income parents. Journal of Social Issues, 56(4), 683–706.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00191.Google Scholar
  19. Kontos, S. (1992). Family day care: Out of the shadows and into the limelight. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  20. Laughlin, L. (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring 2011. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, Y. G., Hong, G. S., & Rowe, B. R. (2006). Third shift women in business-owning families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(1), 72–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-005-9003-6.Google Scholar
  22. Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2006). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Boston: Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Myrie, J., & Daly, K. (2009). The use of boundaries by self-employed, home-based workers to manage work and family: A qualitative study in Canada. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(4), 386–398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9166-7.Google Scholar
  24. National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. (2016). Characteristics of home-based early care and education providers: Initial findings from the National Survey of Early Care and Education. OPRE Report #2016-13. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, M. (1990). Negotiated care: The experience of family day care providers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Porter, N. M., & Garman, E. T. (1993). Testing a conceptual model of financial well-being. Financial Counseling and Planning, 4, 135–164.Google Scholar
  27. Rettig, K. D., Leichtentritt, R. D., & Danes, S. M. (1999). The effects of resources, decision making, and decision implementing on perceived family well-being in adjusting to an economic stressor. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20(1), 5–34.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022163729635.Google Scholar
  28. Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 58(8), i–179.Google Scholar
  29. The California Child Care Resource and Referral Network. (2013). The 2013 child care portfolio. Retrieved from https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/rrnetwork/pages/88/attachments/original/1450474517/Final_Portfolio_Document.pdf?1450474517.
  30. Tonyan, H. A., Paulsell, D., & Shivers, E. M. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: Understanding and incorporating home-based child care into early education and development systems. Early Education and Development, 29(6), 633–639.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1324243.Google Scholar
  31. US Census Bureau. (n.d.). 2011–2015 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. American FactFinder. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk.
  32. Weaver, R. H. (2002). Predictors of quality and commitment in family child care: Provider education, personal resources, and support. Early Education and Development, 13, 265–282.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1303_2.Google Scholar
  33. Whitebook, M., Phillips, D. A., & Howes, C. (2014). Worthy work, STILL unlivable wages: The early childhood workforce 25 years after the National Child Care Staffing Study. Berkeley: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  34. Whitebook, M., Sakai, L., Kipnis, F., Lee, Y., Bellm, D., Speiglman, R., & Tran, P. (2006). California early care and education workforce study: Licensed family child care providers statewide, 2006. Berkeley: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  35. Zody, Z., Sprenkle, D., MacDermid, S., & Schrank, H. (2006). Boundaries and the functioning of family and business systems. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(2), 185–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-006-9017-8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Family and Consumer SciencesCalifornia State University NorthridgeNorthridgeUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentCalifornia State University NorthridgeNorthridgeUSA
  3. 3.Extension and Outreach, Department of Financial Planning, Housing, and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations