Do Child Care Subsidies Increase Employment Among Low-Income Parents?
State child care subsidy programs are intended to support the employment of low-income parents, particularly for families receiving or likely to receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. To study the impact of child care subsidies on employment, this study used detailed data from a survey of low-income parents in Minnesota, linked with administrative data on subsidy receipt, to estimate endogenous switching models of subsidy receipt and parent work status. Parental preferences about the child development-related characteristics of child care settings were the basis for an instrumental variable used to predict subsidy receipt. Receiving a subsidy significantly increased the probability of employment and especially of full-time employment. The findings suggest that expansion of the child care subsidy program could lead to increased employment among low-income parents with young children.
KeywordsChild care Work support Child care subsidies Employment Endogenous switching model Instrumental variables
JEL ClassificationJ22 J13 I38
Funding for this research was provided through Grants #90YE098 and #90YE0132 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. The contents and conclusions are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the US Department of Health and Human Services. The sponsors had no role in the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. The survey design and data collection were part of a larger research project led by Kathryn Tout at Child Trends. Davis also acknowledges the support of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Multistate Project NE-1049 and Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Project MIN-14-081.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Adams, G., & Matthews, H. (2013). Confronting the Child Care Eligibility Maze: Simplifying and aligning with other work supports. Work support strategies: Streamlining access, strengthening families. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Adams, G., Snyder, K., & Sandfort, J. R. (2002). Getting and retaining child care assistance: How policy and practice influence parents’ experiences (No. 55). Urban Institute Occasional Paper. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Administration for Children and Families Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Characteristics of families served by child care and development fund (CCDF) based on preliminary FY 2014 data. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/occ/resource/characteristics-of-families-served-by-child-care-and-development-fund-ccdf.
- Anderson, P. M., & Levine, P. B. (2000). Child care and mothers’ employment decisions. In D. E. Card & R. M. Blank (Eds.), Finding jobs: Work and welfare reform (pp. 420–462). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Blau, D., & Currie, J. (2004). Preschool, day care, and afterschool care: Who’s minding the kids (No. 10670). NBER Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
- Bowman, M., Connelly, J., Datta, A. R., Guiltinan, S., & Yan, T. (2009). Design Phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Feasibility test report. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center (NORC).Google Scholar
- Bowman, M., Datta, A. R., & Yan, T. (2010). Design Phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Cognitive interview findings. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center (NORC).Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.-a). Local area unemployment statistics, expanded state employment status demographic data tables. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/lau/ex14tables.htm. Accessed 2018.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.-b). Labor force statistics from the current population survey 2010 annual averages—household data—tables from employment and earnings. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_aa2010.htm. Accessed 2018.
- Burstein, N., & Layzer, J. I. (2007). National study of child care for low-income families: Patterns of child care use among low-income families: Final report. Cambridge: Abt Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Chase, R., & Valorose, J. (2010). Child Care Use in Minnesota: Report of the 2009 Statewide Household Child Care Survey. St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
- Chaudry, A. (2004). Putting children first: How low-wage working mothers manage child care. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Program; Proposed Rule. (2013). Federal Register, 78(97), 29442–29498.Google Scholar
- Child Care Aware of America. (2015). Parents and the high cost of child care. Arlington: Child Care Aware of America.Google Scholar
- Collins, A., Layzer, J. I., & Kreader, J. L. (2007). National study of child care for low-income families: State and community substudy final report. Cambridge: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
- Davis, E. E., Krafft, C., & Tout, K. (2014). Stability of subsidy use and continuity of care in the child care assistance program in Minnesota. Bethesda, MD: Child Trends.Google Scholar
- Goerge, R. M. (2009). Employment outcomes for low-income families receiving child care subsidies in Illinois, Maryland, and Texas. Chicago: University of Chicago. Chapin Hall Center for Children.Google Scholar
- Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Henly, J. R., & Lambert, S. J. (2005). Nonstandard work and child-care needs of low-income parents. In S. Bianchi, L. M. Casper & B. R. King (Eds.), Work, family, health, and well-being (pp. 473–492). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Huston, A. C., Chang, Y. E., & Gennetian, L. (2002). Family and individual predictors of child care use by low-income families in different policy contexts (No. 9). The Next Generation Working Paper Series. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
- Isaacs, J. (1999). Access to child care for low-income working families. US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Johnson, A. D., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2011). Who uses child care subsidies? Comparing recipients to eligible non-recipients on family background characteristics and child care preferences. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, B. J., Goerge, R., Reidy, M., Kreader, J. L., Georges, A., Wagmiller, R. L. J., et al. (2004). Child Care subsidy use and employment outcomes of TANF mothers during the early years of welfare reform: A three-state study. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Lowe, E. D., & Weisner, T. S. (2004). ‘You have to push it—who’s gonna raise your kids?’: Situating child care and child care subsidy use in the daily routines of lower income families. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(2), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matthews, H., & Schmit, S. (2014). Child care assistance spending and participation in 2012. Washington, DC: CLASP.Google Scholar
- Michalopoulos, C., Lundquist, E., & Castells, N. (2010). The effects of child care subsidies for moderate-income families in Cook County, Illinois. OPRE 2011-3. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2012). Child care assistance: Facts and figures. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
- Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2015). Minnesota child care assistance program state fiscal year 2014 family profile. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
- Miranda, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2006). Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables. Stata Journal, 6(3), 285–308.Google Scholar
- Office of Child Care Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). FY 2001 CCDF data tables and charts. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/occ/resource/ccdf-data-01acf800-0.
- Office of Child Care Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). FY 2015 CCDF data tables (final). Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/occ/resource/fy-2015-ccdf-data-tables-final.
- Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Estimates of child care eligibility and receipt for fiscal year 2011. ASPE Issue Brief. Google Scholar
- Pronzato, C. D., & Sorrenti, G. (2015). When context does matter. childcare and maternal employment: Trying to solve the puzzle. CESinfo DICE Report, 13(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
- Roodman, D. (2011). Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Stata Journal, 11(2), 159–206.Google Scholar
- Schulman, K., & Blank, H. (2010). State child care assistance policies 2010: New federal funds help states weather the storm. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.Google Scholar
- Schulman, K., & Blank, H. (2016). Red light, green light: State child care assistance policies 2016. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.Google Scholar
- Toossi, M. (2012). Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 43–64.Google Scholar
- Tout, K., Forry, N. D., Blasberg, A., Isner, T., Carlin, C., & Davis, E. E. (2011). Minnesota child care choices: Study and sample description. Bethesda: Child Trends.Google Scholar
- US Bureau of Labor Statistics Current Population Survey. (2014). Labor force participation rates of mothers by age of children, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2014 annual averages. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/laborforce_participation_rate_mothers_children_hisp_2014_txt.htm.
- US Census Bureau. (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: 2011–detailed tables. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sipp/data/tables/2008-panel/2011-tables.html.