Advertisement

Do Child Care Subsidies Increase Employment Among Low-Income Parents?

  • Elizabeth E. Davis
  • Caroline Carlin
  • Caroline Krafft
  • Nicole D. Forry
Original Paper

Abstract

State child care subsidy programs are intended to support the employment of low-income parents, particularly for families receiving or likely to receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. To study the impact of child care subsidies on employment, this study used detailed data from a survey of low-income parents in Minnesota, linked with administrative data on subsidy receipt, to estimate endogenous switching models of subsidy receipt and parent work status. Parental preferences about the child development-related characteristics of child care settings were the basis for an instrumental variable used to predict subsidy receipt. Receiving a subsidy significantly increased the probability of employment and especially of full-time employment. The findings suggest that expansion of the child care subsidy program could lead to increased employment among low-income parents with young children.

Keywords

Child care Work support Child care subsidies Employment Endogenous switching model Instrumental variables 

JEL Classification

J22 J13 I38 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided through Grants #90YE098 and #90YE0132 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. The contents and conclusions are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the US Department of Health and Human Services. The sponsors had no role in the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. The survey design and data collection were part of a larger research project led by Kathryn Tout at Child Trends. Davis also acknowledges the support of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Multistate Project NE-1049 and Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Project MIN-14-081.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adams, G., & Matthews, H. (2013). Confronting the Child Care Eligibility Maze: Simplifying and aligning with other work supports. Work support strategies: Streamlining access, strengthening families. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, G., Snyder, K., & Sandfort, J. R. (2002). Getting and retaining child care assistance: How policy and practice influence parents’ experiences (No. 55). Urban Institute Occasional Paper. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Administration for Children and Families Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Characteristics of families served by child care and development fund (CCDF) based on preliminary FY 2014 data. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/occ/resource/characteristics-of-families-served-by-child-care-and-development-fund-ccdf.
  4. Ahn, H. (2012). Child care subsidy, child care costs, and employment of low-income single mothers. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 379–387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, P. M., & Levine, P. B. (2000). Child care and mothers’ employment decisions. In D. E. Card & R. M. Blank (Eds.), Finding jobs: Work and welfare reform (pp. 420–462). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Angrist, J. D. (2001). Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19(1), 2–28.  https://doi.org/10.1198/07350010152472571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bainbridge, J., Meyers, M. K., Tanaka, S., & Waldfogel, J. (2005). Who gets an early education? Family income and the enrollment of three- to five-year-olds from 1968 to 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 724–745.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00326.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker, M., Gruber, J., & Milligan, K. (2008). Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being. Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), 709–745.  https://doi.org/10.1086/591908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauernschuster, S., & Schlotter, M. (2015). Public child care and mothers’ labor supply—Evidence from two quasi-experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 123, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, M. C., & Black, D. A. (1992). Child care subsidies, quality of care, and the labor supply of low-income, single mothers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 635–642.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2109377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau, D., & Currie, J. (2004). Preschool, day care, and afterschool care: Who’s minding the kids (No. 10670). NBER Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, D., & Hagy, A. P. (1998). The demand for quality in child care. Journal of Political Economy, 106(1), 104–146.  https://doi.org/10.1086/250004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blau, D., & Tekin, E. (2007). The determinants and consequences of child care subsidies for single mothers in the USA. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 719–741.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-005-0022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowman, M., Connelly, J., Datta, A. R., Guiltinan, S., & Yan, T. (2009). Design Phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Feasibility test report. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center (NORC).Google Scholar
  15. Bowman, M., Datta, A. R., & Yan, T. (2010). Design Phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Cognitive interview findings. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center (NORC).Google Scholar
  16. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.-a). Local area unemployment statistics, expanded state employment status demographic data tables. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/lau/ex14tables.htm. Accessed 2018.
  17. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.-b). Labor force statistics from the current population survey 2010 annual averages—household data—tables from employment and earnings. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_aa2010.htm. Accessed 2018.
  18. Burstein, N., & Layzer, J. I. (2007). National study of child care for low-income families: Patterns of child care use among low-income families: Final report. Cambridge: Abt Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Cascio, E. U. (2009). Maternal labor supply and the introduction of kindergartens into American public schools. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 140–170.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2009.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chase, R., & Valorose, J. (2010). Child Care Use in Minnesota: Report of the 2009 Statewide Household Child Care Survey. St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  21. Chaudry, A. (2004). Putting children first: How low-wage working mothers manage child care. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Program; Proposed Rule. (2013). Federal Register, 78(97), 29442–29498.Google Scholar
  23. Child Care Aware of America. (2015). Parents and the high cost of child care. Arlington: Child Care Aware of America.Google Scholar
  24. Coley, R. L., Votruba-Drzal, E., Collins, M. A., & Miller, P. (2014). Selection into early education and care settings: Differences by developmental period. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 319–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Collins, A., Layzer, J. I., & Kreader, J. L. (2007). National study of child care for low-income families: State and community substudy final report. Cambridge: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Coneus, K., Goeggel, K., & Muehler, G. (2009). Maternal employment and child care decision. Oxford Economic Papers, 61, i1l72–188.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.12.1.67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Connelly, R. (1992). The effect of child care costs on married women’s labor force participation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(1), 83–90.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2109545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Connelly, R., & Kimmel, J. (2003). Marital status and full-time/part-time work status in child care choices. Applied Economics, 35(7), 761–777.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684022000020841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crawford, A. (2006). The impact of child care subsidies on single mothers’ work effort. Review of Policy Research, 23(3), 699–711.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00224.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Crosby, D. A., Gennetian, L., & Huston, A. C. (2005). Child care assistance policies can affect the use of center-based care for children in low-income families. Applied Developmental Science, 9(2), 86–106.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0902_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Danziger, S. K., Ananat, E. O., & Browning, K. G. (2004). Childcare subsidies and the transition from welfare to work. Family Relations, 53(2), 219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00012.x.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, E. E., & Connelly, R. (2005). The influence of local price and availability on parents’ choice of child care. Population Research and Policy Review, 24(4), 301–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-005-8515-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis, E. E., Krafft, C., & Tout, K. (2014). Stability of subsidy use and continuity of care in the child care assistance program in Minnesota. Bethesda, MD: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  34. Deidda, M. (2014). Economic hardship, housing cost burden and tenure status: Evidence from EU-SILC. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(4), 531–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9431-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Early, D. M., & Burchinal, M. R. (2001). Early childhood care: Relations with family characteristics and preferred care characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(4), 475–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00120-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ficano, C. K. C., Gennetian, L. A., & Morris, P. A. (2006). Child care subsidies and employment behavior among very-low-income populations in three states. Review of Policy Research, 23(3), 681–698.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00223.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fitzpatrick, M. D. (2010). Preschoolers enrolled and mothers at work? The effects of universal prekindergarten. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 51–85.  https://doi.org/10.1086/648666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fitzpatrick, M. D. (2012). Revising our thinking about the relationship between maternal labor supply and preschool. Journal of Human Resources, 47(3), 583–612.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2012.0026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Forry, N. D., & Hofferth, S. L. (2011). Maintaining work: The influence of child care subsidies on child care-related work disruptions. Journal of Family Issues, 32(3), 346–368.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10384467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gelbach, J. (2002). Public schooling for young children and maternal labor supply. The American Economic Review, 92(1), 307–322.  https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goerge, R. M. (2009). Employment outcomes for low-income families receiving child care subsidies in Illinois, Maryland, and Texas. Chicago: University of Chicago. Chapin Hall Center for Children.Google Scholar
  42. Hamerle, A., & Ronning, G. (1995). Panel analysis for qualitative variables. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 401–451). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hardoy, I., & Schøne, P. (2013). Enticing even higher female labor supply: The impact of cheaper day care. Review of Economics of the Household, 13(4), 815–836.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9215-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2011). Money for nothing? Universal child care and maternal employment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11–12), 1455–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2015). Is universal child care leveling the playing field? Journal of Public Economics, 127, 100–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henly, J. R., & Lambert, S. J. (2005). Nonstandard work and child-care needs of low-income parents. In S. Bianchi, L. M. Casper & B. R. King (Eds.), Work, family, health, and well-being (pp. 473–492). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Herbst, C. M. (2008). Who are the eligible non-recipients of child care subsidies? Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 1037–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Herbst, C. M. (2010). The labor supply effects of child care costs and wages in the presence of subsidies and the earned income tax credit. Review of Economics of the Household, 8, 199–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9078-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Herbst, C. M., & Tekin, E. (2010). Child care subsidies and child development. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 618–638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Herbst, C. M., & Tekin, E. (2011). Do child care subsidies influence single mothers’ decision to invest in human capital? Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 901–912.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hirshberg, D., Huang, D. S.-C., & Fuller, B. (2005). Which low-income parents select child-care? Children and Youth Services Review, 27(10), 1119–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huston, A. C., Chang, Y. E., & Gennetian, L. (2002). Family and individual predictors of child care use by low-income families in different policy contexts (No. 9). The Next Generation Working Paper Series. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  54. Isaacs, J. (1999). Access to child care for low-income working families. US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  55. Johnson, A. D., & Herbst, C. M. (2013). Can we trust parental reports of child care subsidy receipt? Children and Youth Services Review, 35(6), 984–993.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnson, A. D., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2011). Who uses child care subsidies? Comparing recipients to eligible non-recipients on family background characteristics and child care preferences. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1072–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Johnson, A. D., Ryan, R. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2012). Child-care subsidies: Do they impact the quality of care children experience? Child Development, 83(4), 1444–1461.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.1780.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaiser, H. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kalb, G. (2009). Children, labour supply and child care: Challenges for empirical analysis. Australian Economic Review, 42(3), 276–299.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8462.2009.00545.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kim, J., & Fram, M. S. (2009). Profiles of choice: Parents’ patterns of priority in child care decision-making. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(1), 77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kimmel, J. (1998). Child care costs as a barrier to employment for single and married mothers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(2), 287–299.  https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Krafft, C., Davis, E. E., & Tout, K. (2015). The problem of measurement error in self-reported receipt of child care subsidies: Evidence from two states. Social Service Review, 89(4), 686–726.  https://doi.org/10.1086/684967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Krafft, C., Davis, E. E., & Tout, K. (2017). Child care subsidies and the stability and quality of child care arrangements. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 39, 14–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lancaster, T. (2000). The incidental parameter problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics, 95(2), 391–413.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00044-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee, B. J., Goerge, R., Reidy, M., Kreader, J. L., Georges, A., Wagmiller, R. L. J., et al. (2004). Child Care subsidy use and employment outcomes of TANF mothers during the early years of welfare reform: A three-state study. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  67. Lemke, R. J., Witt, R., & Witte, A. D. (2007). The transition from welfare to work. Eastern Economic Journal, 33(3), 359–373.  https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2007.30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lowe, E. D., & Weisner, T. S. (2004). ‘You have to push it—who’s gonna raise your kids?’: Situating child care and child care subsidy use in the daily routines of lower income families. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(2), 143–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Markowitz, A. J., Ryan, R. M., & Johnson, A. D. (2014). Child care subsidies and child care choices: The moderating role of household structure. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 230–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Matthews, H., & Schmit, S. (2014). Child care assistance spending and participation in 2012. Washington, DC: CLASP.Google Scholar
  71. Meyers, M. K., & Heintze, T. (1999). The performance of the child-care subsidy system. Social Service Review, 73(1), 37–64.  https://doi.org/10.1086/515796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meyers, M. K., Heintze, T., & Wolf, D. A. (2002). Child care subsidies and the employment of welfare recipients. Demography, 39(1), 165–179.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2002.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Michalopoulos, C., Lundquist, E., & Castells, N. (2010). The effects of child care subsidies for moderate-income families in Cook County, Illinois. OPRE 2011-3. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  74. Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2012). Child care assistance: Facts and figures. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  75. Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2015). Minnesota child care assistance program state fiscal year 2014 family profile. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  76. Miranda, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2006). Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables. Stata Journal, 6(3), 285–308.Google Scholar
  77. Morrissey, T. W. (2017). Child care and parent labor force participation: A review of the research literature. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9331-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16(1), 1–32.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1914288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Office of Child Care Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). FY 2001 CCDF data tables and charts. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/occ/resource/ccdf-data-01acf800-0.
  80. Office of Child Care Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). FY 2015 CCDF data tables (final). Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/occ/resource/fy-2015-ccdf-data-tables-final.
  81. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Estimates of child care eligibility and receipt for fiscal year 2011. ASPE Issue Brief. Google Scholar
  82. Peyton, V., Jacobs, A., O’Brien, M., & Roy, C. (2001). Reasons for choosing child care: Associations with family factors, quality, and satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(2), 191–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00098-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pronzato, C. D., & Sorrenti, G. (2015). When context does matter. childcare and maternal employment: Trying to solve the puzzle. CESinfo DICE Report, 13(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  84. Ribar, D. C. (1992). Child care and the labor supply of married women: Reduced form evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 27(1), 134–165.  https://doi.org/10.2307/145915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Roodman, D. (2011). Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Stata Journal, 11(2), 159–206.Google Scholar
  86. Ryan, R. M., Johnson, A. D., Rigby, E., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2011). The impact of child care subsidy use on child care quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 320–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schulman, K., & Blank, H. (2010). State child care assistance policies 2010: New federal funds help states weather the storm. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.Google Scholar
  88. Schulman, K., & Blank, H. (2016). Red light, green light: State child care assistance policies 2016. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.Google Scholar
  89. Tang, S., Coley, R. L., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2012). Low-income families’ selection of child care for their young children. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(10), 2002–2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tekin, E. (2005). Child care subsidy receipt, employment, and child care choices of single mothers. Economics Letters, 89(1), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tekin, E. (2007a). Childcare subsidies, wages, and employment of single mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 42(2), 453–487.  https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XLII.2.453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tekin, E. (2007b). Single mothers working at night: Standard work and child care subsidies. Economic Inquiry, 45(2), 233–250.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00039.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Terza, J. V., Basu, A., & Rathouz, P. J. (2008). Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 531–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Toossi, M. (2012). Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 43–64.Google Scholar
  95. Tout, K., Forry, N. D., Blasberg, A., Isner, T., Carlin, C., & Davis, E. E. (2011). Minnesota child care choices: Study and sample description. Bethesda: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  96. US Bureau of Labor Statistics Current Population Survey. (2014). Labor force participation rates of mothers by age of children, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2014 annual averages. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/laborforce_participation_rate_mothers_children_hisp_2014_txt.htm.
  97. US Census Bureau. (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: 2011–detailed tables. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sipp/data/tables/2008-panel/2011-tables.html.
  98. Weinraub, M., Shlay, A. B., Harmon, M., & Tran, H. (2005). Subsidizing child care: How child care subsidies affect the child care used by low-income African American families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(4), 373–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth E. Davis
    • 1
  • Caroline Carlin
    • 2
  • Caroline Krafft
    • 3
  • Nicole D. Forry
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsUniversity of MinnesotaSt PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsSt. Catherine UniversitySt PaulUSA
  4. 4.Child TrendsBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations