Intergenerational Persistence of Skills and Socioeconomic Status

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper describes how the socioeconomic status (SES) of parents relates to the formation and development of the skills and preferences of their teenage children, which have proven to be key to understanding differences in life outcomes. The study used data from a novel survey, conducted in Mexico, that recorded cognitive and non-cognitive skills and social preferences of both parents and children. It analyzed the relationship between the SES of parents and their children’s skills, and found that children’s skills were consistently related to parental skills, and that intergenerational persistence of skills was higher for cognitive than for non-cognitive skills or social preferences. It also found that the cognitive skills gap between the first and fifth quintile of SES was related mainly to characteristics like parents’ own skills, years of schooling, and aspirations for their children, but that these parental characteristics were less important in explaining non-cognitive skills and preferences.

Keywords

Skills Preferences Intergenerational Persistence Socioeconomic status Mexico 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for comments from Mariano Bosch, Isidro Soloaga, Sergio Urzua, and participants at the following conferences: “Skills: Measurements, Dynamics, and Effects,” hosted by the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association; “The Intergenerational Transmission of Economic Status: Exposure, Heritability, and Opportunity,” organized by the Universidad Carlos III in Madrid; and the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. I also wish to thank Cristobal Domínguez for excellent research assistance and two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. Any errors or omissions are solely my responsibility.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of economics of education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin, D., & Hauser, R. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 37–47. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094445.
  3. Anger, S. (2011). The intergenerational transmission of cognitive and non-cognitive skills during adolescence and young childhood. (IZA Discussion Paper 5749). Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp5749.pdf.
  4. Anger, S., & Heineck, G. (2010). Do smart parents raise smart children? The intergenerational transmission of cognitive abilities. Journal of Population Economics, 23(3), 1105–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0298-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anger, S., & Schnitzlein, D. D. (2013, January). Like brother, like sister? The importance of family background for cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Paper presented at the German Economic Association Annual Conference 2013: Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order, Dusseldorf, Germany. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80052.
  6. Becker, A., Deckers, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., & Kosse, F. (2012). The relationship between economic preferences and psychological personality measures. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 453–478.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanden, J., Gregg, P., & Macmillan, L. (2007). Accounting for intergenerational income persistence: Noncognitive skills, ability and education. The Economic Journal, 117(519), C43–C60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02034.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowles, S., Gintis, H., & Groves, M. (Eds.) (2005). Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. New York: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7tbdz.
  9. Caliendo, M., Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Uhlendorff, A. (2015). Locus of control and job search strategies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 88–103.  https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campos-Vazquez, R. M. (2016). Guía del usuario: Encuesta de movilidad social 2015. Retrieved from http://movilidadsocial.colmex.mx/images/encuesta/guia-emovi2015.pdf.
  11. Carvalho, L. (2012). Childhood circumstances and the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status. Demography, 49(3), 913–938.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0120-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CEEY [Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias]. (2013). Informe movilidad social en México: Imagina tu futuro. Mexico City: Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias.Google Scholar
  13. Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009). Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 809–842.  https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cobb-Clark, D. A. (2015). Locus of control and the labor market. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 4(1), 3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-014-0017-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawford, C., Goodman, A., & Joyce, R. (2011). Explaining the socio-economic gradient in child outcomes: The inter-generational transmission of cognitive skills. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2(1), 77–93.  https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i1.143.Google Scholar
  18. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2009). The economics and psychology of inequality and human development. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 320–364.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Currie, J. (2009). Healthy, wealthy, and wise: Socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood, and human capital development. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 87–122.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deckers, T., Falk, A., Kosse, F., & Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2015). How does socio-economic status shape a childs personality? (IZA Discussion Paper 8977). Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp8977.pdf.
  21. Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2015). Patience and the wealth of nations. Retrieved from http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Dohmen_Enke_etal_2016_patience-wealth-nations.pdf.
  22. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), 645–677.  https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (Grit–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1086/224256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duncan, G., Kalil, A., Mayer, S. E., Tepper, R., & Payne, M. R. (2005). The apple does not fall far from the tree. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. O. Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ermisch, J., Jäntti, M., & Smeeding, T. (Eds.) (2012). From parents to children: The intergenerational transmission of advantage. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447805.
  28. Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2016). The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. (IZA Discussion Paper 9674.) Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp9674.pdf.
  29. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.  https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Population and Development Review, 25(1), 85–120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gasparini, L., & Lustig, N. (2011). The rise and fall of income inequality in Latin America. (Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, ECINEQ Working Paper 213.) Retrieved from http://www.ecineq.org/milano/wp/ecineq2011-213.pdf.
  32. Golsteyn, B. H. H., Grönqvist, H., & Lindahl, L. (2014). Adolescent time preferences predict lifetime outcomes. The Economic Journal, 124(580), F739–F761.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodman, A., Gregg, P., & Washbrook, E. (2011). Children’s educational attainment and the aspirations, attitudes and behaviours of parents and children through childhood. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2(1), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i1.147.Google Scholar
  34. Grönqvist, E., Öckert, B., & Vlachos, J. (2017). The intergenerational transmission of cognitive and noncognitive abilities. Journal of Human Resources, 52(4), 887–918.  https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.4.0115-6882r1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guryan, J., Hurst, E., & Kearney, M. (2008). Parental education and parental time with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 23–46.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.3.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanushek, E. A., Schwerdt, G., Wiederhold, S., & Woessmann, L. (2015). Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. European Economic Review, 73, 103–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  38. Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heineck, G., & Anger, S. (2010). The returns to cognitive abilities and personality traits in Germany. Labour Economics, 17(3), 535–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Loehlin, J. C. (2005). Resemblance in personality and attitudes between parents and their children: Genetic and environmental contributions. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. O. Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 229–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-005-0224-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mischel, W. (2014). The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  43. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mood, C., Jonsson, J., & Bihagen, E. (2012). Socioeconomic persistence across generations: Cognitive and noncognitive processes. In J. Ermisch, M. Jäntti, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), From parents to children: The intergenerational transmission of advantage. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447805.7.
  45. Mosing, M. A., Pedersen, N. L., Cesarini, D., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K. E., Nakamura, J., et al. (2012). Genetic and environmental influences on the relationship between flow proneness, locus of control and behavioral inhibition. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e47958.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ostrosky-Solís, F., & Lozano, A. (2006). Digit span: Effect of education and culture. International Journal of Psychology, 41(5), 333–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590500345724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piatek, R., & Pinger, P. (2010). Maintaining (locus of) control? Assessing the impact of locus of control on education decisions and wages. (IZA Discussion Paper 5289.) Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp5289.pdf.
  48. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rammstedt, B. (2007). Who worries and who is happy? Explaining individual differences in worries and satisfaction by personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1626–1634.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richardson, J. T. E. (2007). Measures of short-term memory: A historical review. Cortex, 43(5), 635–650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70493-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schady, N., Behrman, J., Araujo, M. C., Azuero, R., Bernal, R., Bravo, D., et al. (2015). Wealth gradients in early childhood cognitive development in five Latin American countries. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 446–463.  https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schipolowski, S., Wilhelm, O., & Schroeders, U. (2014). On the nature of crystallized intelligence: The relationship between verbal ability and factual knowledge. Intelligence, 46, 156–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schurer, S., Kassenboehmer, S., & Leung, F. (2015, July). Testing the human capital model of education: Do universities shape their students’ character traits? Paper presented at the 44th Australian Conference of Economists (ACE 2015), Brisbane, Queensland. Retrieved from https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=ACE2015&paper_id=68.
  56. Suskind, D. (2015). Thirty million words: Building a child’s brain. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  57. Torche, F. (2014). Intergenerational mobility and inequality: The Latin American case. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 619–642.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Torche, F. (2015). Intergenerational mobility and gender in Mexico. Social Forces, 94(2), 563–587.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turkheimer, E., Pettersson, E., & Horn, E. E. (2014). A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 515–540.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vischer, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Schupp, J., Sunde, U., & Wagner, G. G. (2013). Validating an ultra-short survey measure of patience. Economics Letters, 120(2), 142–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsEl Colegio de MéxicoCiudad de MéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations