Money Over Marriage: Marriage Importance as a Mediator Between Materialism and Marital Satisfaction
- 304 Downloads
While the negative relationship between materialism and marital satisfaction is well documented, mediators that possibly explain this association have not been widely explored. Based on the Incompatibility of Materialism and Children Model and Marital Paradigms Theory, this article explores the perception of marriage importance as a potential mediator between materialism and marital satisfaction. Using a sample of 1310 married individuals, we found evidence of partial mediation in that materialism was negatively associated with perception of marriage importance, and this association partially explained why being materialistic was associated with lower marital satisfaction. Thus, as counselors, therapists, and financial planners work with married clients, it is important that they consider how their clients’ materialistic tendencies may influence the family both financially and relationally. Suggestions for future research are discussed.
KeywordsFamily finance Materialism Financial therapy Financial planning Marital satisfaction Marital centrality
We would like to thank Dr. Sarah Coyne, Dr. Brian Willoughby, and Nathan Leonhardt for their helpful reviews of earlier drafts. We would like to thank Dr. Jeremy Yorgason, Dr. Joseph Olsen, and Dr. Spencer James for their statistical counsel. Finally, we would like to thank Dr. Jeff Hill and Dr. Loren Marks for their encouragement and support.
No funding was received for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Ashley LeBaron declares that she has no conflict of interest. Heather Kelley declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jason Carroll declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity,and relationships to other measures of happiness. In T. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 11, pp. 291–297). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. Retrieved from http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/6260/volumes/v11/NA-11.
- Bellah, R. N. (1996). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Britt, S., Hill, E. J., LeBaron, A. B., & Bean, R. (2016). Savers and spenders: Predicting financial conflict in couple relationships. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Financial Planning Association to be held in Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
- Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 348–370. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/jcr/.
- Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50(4), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00308.x.
- Carroll, J. S., Dean, L. R., Call, L. L., & Busby, D. M. (2011). Materialism and marriage: Couple profiles of congruent and incongruent spouses.Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 10(4), 287–308. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wcrt20/current.
- Conger, R. D., Elder, G. H. Jr., Lorenz, F., Conger, K., Simons, R., Whitbeck, L., Huck, S., & Melby, J. (1990). Linking economic hardship to marital quality and distress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 643–656. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1741-3737.
- Conger, R. D., Ge, X., & Lorenz, F. O. (1994). Economic stress and marital relations. In R. D. Conger & G. H. Elder Jr. (Eds.), Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America (pp. 187–203). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Country Comparison: GDP—Per capita (PPP). (2009). CIA world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html.
- Country Comparison: Total Fertility Rate. (2009). CIA world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html.
- Doherty, W. J., Galston, W. A., Glenn, N. D., Gottman, J., Markey, B., Markman, H. J., et al. (2002). Why marriage matters: Twenty-one conclusions from the social sciences. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
- Gudmunson, C. G., Beutler, I. F., Israelsen, C. L., McCoy, J. K., & Hill, E. J. (2007). Linking financial strain to marital instability: Examining the roles of emotional distress and marital interaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-007-9074-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holman, T. B., Busby, D. M., Doxey, C., Klein, D. M., & Loyer-Carlson, V. (1997). The RELATionship Evaluation (RELATE). Provo, UT: Marriage Study Consortium.Google Scholar
- Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In P. Schmuck & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well- being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 116–131). Goettingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Li, N. P., Patel, L., Balliet, D., Tov, W., & Scollon, C. N. (2011). The incompatibility of materialism and the desire for children: Psychological insights into the fertility discrepancy among modern countries. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9665-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Myers, D. G. (1999). Close relationships and quality of life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 374–391). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Nickerson, C., Schwarz, N., Diener, E., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the American dream: A closer look at the negative consequences of the goal for financial success. Psychological Science, 14, 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1461.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F., & Steemers, G. (1997a). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar