Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 88–102 | Cite as

Uncertainty, Doubts, and Delays: Economic Circumstances and Childbearing Expectations Among Emerging Adults

  • Sarah R. Brauner-OttoEmail author
  • Claudia Geist
Article

Abstract

Fertility, or childbearing, expectations have been increasingly identified as an important area of research, at least in part because expectations may help us to understand family issues of concern across the globe such as unintended pregnancies, low fertility, and delayed childbearing. While much research has focused on the link between expectations and behavior, this study extends the literature by asking how those expectations were shaped initially. Specifically, we explore how one’s economic context is related to expectations. This paper further extends the literature by focusing on two dimensions of the parenthood expectations of young people (men and women aged 18–27). Using the 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011 waves of the Panel Studies of Income Dynamics (PSID) Transition to Adulthood (TA) sample, we considered whether young people expected to have children in the future and, for those who did, when they expected to do so. The results support financial-strain theories of the relationship between (subjective and objective) economic circumstances and childbearing expectations. Women and men with lower earnings, less education, and more worries about their future job prospects are more uncertain whether they will have children. Of those who expect to have children, those with more education and more worries expect to do so later in life. Further analyses reveal that race and gender condition these relationships.

Keywords

Childbearing Childbearing expectations Fertility intentions Economic well-being Work and family Economics Economic worries 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. The PSID data is in the public domain.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachrach, C. A., & Morgan, S. P. (2013). A cognitive-social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 459–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00612.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Begall, K., & Mills, M. (2011). The impact of subjective work control, job strain and work-family conflict on fertility intentions: A European comparison. European Journal of Population, 27(4), 433–456. doi: 10.1007/s10680-011-9244-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, L. M., Collins, J. M., & Cuesta, L. (2016). Household debt and adult depressive symptoms. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 37(1), 42–57. doi: 10.1007/s10834-015-9443-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berninger, I., Weiß, B., & Wagner, M. (2011). On the links between employment, partnership quality, and the intention to have a first child: The case of West Germany. Demographic Research, 24, 579–610. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, H. P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (Eds.), (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society: The losers in a globalizing world. Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Blum, R. W., Beuhring, T., Shew, M. L., Bearinger, L. H., Sieving, R. E., & Resnick, M. D. (2000). The effects of race/ethnicity, income, and family structure on adolescent risk behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 90(12), 1879–1884. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.12.1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. (2004). Population aging and the rising cost of public pensions. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2010). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2015). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000.
  12. Charles, N., & James, E. (2003). Gender and work orientations in conditions of job insecurity. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 239–257. doi: 10.1080/0007131032000080221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conger, R. D., Elder, G. H. Jr., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, K. J., Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., … Melby, J. N. (1990). Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(3), 643–656. doi: 10.2307/352931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Witte, H. (1999). Job insecurity and psychological well-being: Review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 155–177. doi: 10.1080/135943299398302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. del Bono, E., Weber, A., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2012). Clash of career and family: Fertility decisions after job displacement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(4), 659–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01074.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiPrete, T. A., Morgan, S. P., Engelhardt, H., & Pacalova, H. (2003). Do cross-national differences in the costs of children generate cross-national differences in fertility rates? Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5–6), 439–477. doi: 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020961.89068.91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaunt, R., & Benjamin, O. (2007). Job insecurity, stress and gender: The moderating role of gender ideology. Community, Work and Family, 10(3), 341–355. doi: 10.1080/13668800701456336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray, E., Evans, A., & Reimondos, A. (2013). Childbearing desires of childless men and women: When are goals adjusted? Advances in Life Course Research, 18(2), 141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grodsky, E., & Pager, D. (2001). The structure of disadvantage: Individual and occupational determinants of the black-white wage gap. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 542–567. doi: 10.2307/3088922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudmunson, C. G., Beutler, I. F., Israelsen, C. L., Mccoy, J. K., & Hill, E. J. (2007). Linking financial strain to marital instability: Examining the roles of emotional distress and marital interaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(3), 357–376. doi: 10.1007/s10834-007-9074-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes, J. T., Vanbrackle, A., & Sigman-Grant, M. (2015). Influence of perceived economic strain on the relationship between caregiver BMI and child BMI. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 37(2), 172–181. doi: 10.1007/s10834-015-9468-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayford, S. R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography, 46(4), 765–783. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2013). Racial and ethnic variation in unmarried young adults’ motivation to avoid pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(1), 41–51. doi: 10.1363/4504113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A., & Sanderson, W. C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population, 24(2), 129–156. doi: 10.1007/s10680-008-9162-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henshaw, S. K. (1997). Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 24–29. doi: 10.1363/3002498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilton, J. M., & Devall, E. L. (1997). The family economic strain scale: Development and evaluation of the instrument with single- and two-parent families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18(3), 247–271. doi: 10.1023/A:1024974829218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofmann, B., & Hohmeyer, K. (2013). Perceived economic uncertainty and fertility: Evidence from a labor market reform. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 503–521. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hondroyiannis, G. (2010). Fertility determinants and economic uncertainty: An assessment using European panel data. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1007/s10834-009-9178-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iacovou, M., & Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 89–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00391.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kingsbury, N. M., & Greenwood, L. (1992). Fertility expectation and employment across three female cohorts. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 13(1), 73–93. doi: 10.1007/BF01013646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohler, H., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lebert, F., & Voorpostel, M. (2016). Turnover as a strategy to escape job insecurity: The role of family determinants in dual-earner couples. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 37(3), 407–421. doi: 10.1007/s10834-016-9498-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2014). Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption. Science, 346(6206), 229–234. doi: 10.1126/science.1250542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie, 25(4), 363–386. doi: 10.1007/s10680-008-9173-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Long, J. S. (2009). Group comparisons in logit and probit using predicted probabilities. Department of Sociology, University of Indiana. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/files_research/groupdif/groupwithprobabilities/groups-with-prob-2009-06-25.pdf.
  36. Lundquist, J. H., Budig, M. J., & Curtis, A. (2009). Race and childlessness in America 1988–2002. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 741–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00630.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynn, F. B., Schneider, B., & Zhang, Z. (2013). The changing relationship between fertility expectations and educational expectations: Adolescents in the1970s versus the 1980s. Journal of Family Issues, 34(9), 1147–1174. doi: 10.1177/0192513X12457554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Osteman, M. J. K., & Matthews, T. J. (2013). Births: Final data for 2011. (No. 62). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_01.pdf.
  39. McGonagle, K. A., Schoeni, R. F., Sastry, N., & Freedman, V. A. (2012). The panel study of income dynamics: Overview, recent innovations, and potential for life course research. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(2), 188.Google Scholar
  40. McQuillan, J., Greil, A. L., Shreffler, K. M., & Bedrous, A. V. (2015). The importance of motherhood and fertility intentions among U.S. women. Sociological Perspectives, 58(1), 20–35. doi: 10.1177/0731121414534393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, W. B. (2011). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 75–98. doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40(4), 589–603. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morgan, S. P., & Taylor, M. G. (2006). Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 375–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics. (2015) Earnings and unemployment rates by educational attainment. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm.
  45. Perelli-Harris, B. (2006). The influence of informal work and subjective well-being on childbearing in post-Soviet Russia.. Population and Development Review, 32(4), 729–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00148.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pope, R. (2014). In the spotlight: Meet STATA’s new xtmlogit command. STATA News, 29(2). Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/stata-news/news29-2/xtmlogit/.
  47. (PSID) PSID Main Interview User Manual: Release. (2015a). Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, June, 2015. Retrieved from https://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/data/Documentation/UserGuide2013.pdf.
  48. (PSID) Panel Study of Income Dynamics. (2015b). FAQ #83: How is Head defined in the PSID? Retrieved from https://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/guide/FAQ.aspx?Type=ALL#130.
  49. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512. doi: 10.2307/2061419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rindfuss, R. R., Guzzo, K. B., & Morgan, S. P. (2003). The changing institutional context of low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5–6), 411–438. doi: 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020877.96401.b3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandberg-Thoma, S. E., Snyder, A. R., & Jang, B. J. (2015). Exiting and returning to the parental home for boomerang kids. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 806–818. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2010). Economic hardship and family-to-work conflict: The importance of gender and work conditions. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(1), 46–61. doi: 10.1007/s10834-010-9206-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schneider, D. (2015). The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1144–1156. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., & Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 790–799. doi: 10.2307/353578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shreffler, K. M., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Fertility intentions, career considerations and subsequent births: The moderating effects of women’s work hours. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34(3), 285–295. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9331-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shreffler, K. M., Pirretti, A. E., & Drago, R. (2010). Work-family conflict and fertility intentions: Does gender matter? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(2), 228–240. doi: 10.1007/s10834-010-9187-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37(2), 267–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sullivan, S. E. (1999). The changing nature of careers: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 25(3), 457–484. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sweeney, M. M., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 539–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Virtanen, M., Kivimaki, M., Joensuu, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2005). Temporary employment and health: A review. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 610–622. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213–228. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(85)90017-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiemers, E. E. (2014). The effect of unemployment on household composition and doubling up. Demography, 51(6), 2155–2178. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0347-0.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations