Program Knowledge and Racial Disparities in Savings Outcomes in a Child Development Account Experiment
- 90 Downloads
This study investigated whether participants’ program knowledge was associated with savings outcomes in Child Development Accounts and whether differences in program knowledge explained racial and ethnic disparities in savings outcomes. We used data collected from White, Black, American Indian, and Hispanic treatment participants in the SEED for Oklahoma Kids (SEED OK) experiment (N = 1126). Analysis results indicated that knowledge of SEED OK program features was low, especially among members of minority groups. Logit and Tobit regressions showed that program knowledge was positively related to the likelihood of holding a SEED OK account and to individual savings amounts. Gaps in program knowledge were associated with racial disparities in savings outcomes. If Whites and minorities had the same levels of program knowledge, gaps in savings outcomes would have significantly narrowed. The findings call for the development of policy designs and communication tools to enhance knowledge of program features among households with Child Development Accounts, especially racial- and ethnic-minority households.
KeywordsRacial disparities Wealth College savings Asset building
Support for SEED for Oklahoma Kids comes from the Ford Foundation and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. We especially value our partnership with the state of Oklahoma: Ken Miller, State Treasurer; Scott Meacham, former State Treasurer; Tim Allen, Deputy Treasurer for Communications and Program Administration; and James Wilbanks, former Director of Revenue and Fiscal Policy. We appreciate the contributions of staff at RTI International. The Oklahoma 529 College Savings Plan Program Manager, TIAA-CREF, has also been a valuable partner. At the Center for Social Development, we are grateful to Mark Schreiner and Nora Wikoff for their assistance in managing the survey data and to Vernon Loke, Lisa Reyes Mason, and Donna-Mae Knights for assistance with data management and cleaning. The authors also thank Christopher Leiker for his wonderful editing assistance and staff on the SEED OK team over several years.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Support for SEED for Oklahoma Kids (SEED OK) comes from the Ford Foundation and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. The sponsors did not participate in the design or conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The SEED OK experiment obtained institutional review board approval from Washington University in Saint Louis (IRB ID No. 201102246). All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. No identifying information about participants is included in the article. The manuscript will not infringe upon any statutory copyright. This paper has not been published previously and is not under consideration elsewhere.
- Baum, S., Ma, J., & Payea, K. (2010). Education pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society (Trends in Higher Education Series Report). Retrieved from College Board website: https://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/education-pays-2010-full-report.pdf.
- Beverly, S. G., Sherraden, M., Cramer, R., Williams Shanks, T. R., Nam, Y., & Zhan, M. (2008). Determinants of asset holdings. In S.-M. McKernan & M. Sherraden (Eds.), Asset building and low-income families (pp. 89–151). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., Brozek, I., & Hughes, C. (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bucks, B. K., Kennickell, A. B., Mach, T. L., & Moore, K. B. (2009). Changes in U.S. family finances from 2004 to 2007: Evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 95, A1–A56.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Defined-contribution plans more common than defined-benefit plans (Program Perspectives on Retirement Benefits No. 3). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/archive/program-perspectives-on-retirement-benefits-pdf.pdf.
- Clancy, M., & Lassar, T. (2010). College savings plan accounts at birth: Maine’s statewide program (CSD Policy Brief No. 10–16). Retrieved from Washington University, Center for Social Development website http://csd.wustl.edu/publications/documents/pb10-16.pdf
- Clayman, M. L., Manganello, J. A., Viswanath, K., Hesse, B. W., & Arora, N. K. (2010). Providing health messages to Hispanics/Latinos: Understanding the importance of language, trust in health information sources, and media use. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl. 3), 252–263. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cramer, R., & Newville, D. (2009). Children’s Savings Accounts: The case for creating a lifelong savings platform at birth as a foundation for a “save-and-invest” economy (Asset Building Program Paper). Washington, DC: New America Foundation.Google Scholar
- Elliott, W., Destin, M. III, & Friedline, T. (2011). Taking stock of ten years of research on the relationship between assets and children’s educational outcomes: Implications for theory, policy and intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 2312–2328. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FinAid. (n.d.). Tuition inflation. Retrieved June 16, 2014, from http://www.finaid.org/savings/tuition-inflation.phtml.
- Government Accountability Office. (2012). Higher education: A small percentage of families save in 529 plans (Report No. GAO-13-64). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-64.
- Gray, K., Clancy, M., Sherraden, M. S., Wagner, K., & Miller-Cribbs, J. (2012). Interviews with mothers of young children in the SEED for Oklahoma Kids college savings experiment (CSD Research Report No. 12–53). Retrieved from Washington University, Center for Social Development website http://csd.wustl.edu/publications/documents/rp12-53.pdf.
- Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Marks, E. L., Rhodes, B. B., Engelhardt, G. V., Scheffler, S., & Wallace, I. F. (2009). Building assets: An impact evaluation of the MI SEED children’s savings program [Report]. Retrieved from RTI International website http://www.rti.org/pubs/mi_seed_report.pdf.
- Marks, E. L., Rhodes, B. B., & Scheffler, S. (2008). SEED for Oklahoma Kids: Baseline analysis [Report]. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.Google Scholar
- Nam, Y., Kim, Y., Clancy, M., Zager, R., & Sherraden, M. (2013). Do child development accounts promote account holding, saving, and asset accumulation for children’s future? Evidence from a statewide randomized experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 6–33. doi: 10.1002/pam.21652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nyce, S. A. (2005). The importance of financial communication for participation rates and contribution levels in 401(k) plans. Benefits Quarterly, 21, 22–39.Google Scholar
- Oklahoma 529 College Savings Plan. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved October 19, 2010, from http://www.ok4saving.org/faq/.
- Pedersen, E. R., Neighbors, C., Tidwell, J., & Lostutter, T. W. (2011). Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences. Ethics and Behavior, 21, 332–350. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2011.585601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schreiner, M. (2012). Meta-data for SEED for Oklahoma Kids: Two survey waves and OSCP administrative data through 2011Q4 [Report]. St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.Google Scholar
- Schreiner, M., & Sherraden, M. (2007). Can the poor save? Saving and asset building in Individual Development Accounts. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
- SEED for Oklahoma Kids. (2008a). Answers to frequently asked questions [Brochure]. Retrieved from state of Oklahoma website: https://www.ok.gov/treasurer/documents/SEEDOK-FAQ-2009.pdf.
- SEED for Oklahoma Kids. (2008b). Let’s get started [Informational booklet]. Retrieved from state of Oklahoma website: https://www.ok.gov/treasurer/documents/SEED-Get-Started+MEF.pdf.
- SEED for Oklahoma Kids. (2008c). SEED for Oklahoma Kids savings match terms. Retrieved from state of Oklahoma website: https://www.ok.gov/treasurer/documents/SEED%20Savings%20Match%20Terms%202009.pdf.
- Shapiro, T. M. (2004). The hidden cost of being African-American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sherraden, M. (1991). Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Skimmyhorn, W. L. (2012). Essays in behavioral household finance (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University). Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9369052/Skimmyhorn_gsas.harvard_0084L_10233.pdf?sequence=1.
- Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd edn.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Weintraub, E. R. (1993). Neoclassical economics. In D. R. Henderson (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of economics. Retrieved from Library of Economics and Liberty website http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NeoclassicalEconomics.html.