Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 204–217 | Cite as

Gender Gap in Health Status of Children in the Context of One-Child Policy in China: Is it Sibling Rivalry or Son Preference?

  • Mayumi Kubo
  • Anoshua ChaudhuriEmail author
Original Paper


This paper used data from 6 waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) 1993–2009 to examine the effects of child gender, number of siblings, and sibling composition on children’s health status, noting particularly any gender gaps, in the context of China’s one-child policy. In the 1990s, the enforcement of the policy became less stringent, and ultrasound technologies, which enable prenatal gender selection, became more available. This led us to believe that the girls who were born were wanted by parents. In addition, growing income and industrialization should also narrow the gender gap in health status. Our results showed that on average, being a female decreased height-for-age approximately by 0.08 z-score as well as having an additional male sibling decreased height-for-age roughly by 0.17 z-score for a child under age 8. These results were particularly strong in the rural area but were non-existent in urban areas and among only-children. Our argument is that the gender gap was due to son preference and not sibling rivalry. Additionally, we found that having only one brother appeared to have a positive effect on girls’ health status, compared to boys with another brother who tended to become rivals for household resources.


One-child policy Health status Gender gap Sibling composition Sibling rivalry Son preference Nutritional status China 


  1. Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Universities-National Bureau. Columbia University Press, pp. 209–240. Retrieved from
  2. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279–288. Retrieved from
  3. Bian, J. (1996). Parental monetary investments in children: A focus on China. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 17(1), 113–139. doi: 10.1007/BF02265033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bongaarts, J., & Greenhalgh, S. (1985). An alternative to the one-child policy in China. Population and Development Review, 11(4), 585–617. doi: 10.2307/1973456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bredenkamp, C. (2009). Policy-related determinants of child nutritional status in China: The effect of only-child status and access to health care. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1531–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulte, E., Heerink, N., & Zhang, X. (2011). China’s one-child policy and ‘the mystery of missing women’: Ethnic minorities and male-biased sex ratios. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73(1), 21–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00601.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013). Little emperors: Behavioral impacts of China’s one-child policy. Science, 339(6122), 953–957. doi: 10.1126/science.1230221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebenstein, A. (2011). Estimating a dynamic model of sex selection in China. Demography, 48(2), 783–811. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0030-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ebenstein, A. Y., & Sharygin, E. J. (2009). The consequences of the “missing girls” of China. The World Bank Economic Review, 23(3), 399–425. Retrieved from
  10. Gao, M., & Yao, Y. (2006). Gender gaps in access to health care in rural China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(1), 87–107. doi: 10.1086/505720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garg, A., & Morduch, J. (1998). Sibling rivalry and the gender gap: Evidence from child health outcomes in Ghana. Journal of Population Economics, 11(4),471–493. Retrieved from
  12. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Sex imbalances at birth: Current trends, consequences and policy implications. Bangkok: UNFPA Asia and the Pacific Regional Office. Retrieved from
  13. Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., & Lim, G. C. (2010). Principles of Econometrics (4th edn.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, M. (2012). The one-child policy and gender equality in education in China: Evidence from household data. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(1), 41–52. doi: 10.1007/s10834-011-9277-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2011). Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: Identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography, 48(4), 1535–1557. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0055-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, J., & Cooney, R. S. (1993). Son preference and the one child policy in China: 1979–1988. Population Research and Policy Review,12(3),277–296. Retrieved from
  17. Millimet, D. L., & Wang, L. (2011). Is the Quantity-quality trade-off a trade-off for all, none, or some? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 60(1), 155–195. doi: 10.1086/661216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy, R., Tao, R., & Lu, X. (2011). Son preference in rural China: Patrilineal families and socioeconomic change. Population and Development Review, 37(4), 665–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osmani, S., & Sen, A. (2003). The hidden penalties of gender inequality: fetal origins of ill-health. Economics and Human Biology, 1(1), 105–121. doi: 10.1016/S1570-677X(02)00006-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Report of a WHO expert committee (1995). Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry (WHO Technical Report Series No. 854). Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from
  21. Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
  22. Short, S. E., Fengying, Z., Siyuan, X., & Mingliang, Y. (2001). China’s one-child policy and the care of children: An analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. Social Forces, 79(3), 913–943. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Short, S. E., & Zhai, F. (1998). Looking locally at China’s one-child policy. Studies in Family Planning, 29(4), 373–387. doi: 10.2307/172250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Song, S., & Burgard, S. A. (2008). Does son preference influence children’s growth in height? A comparative study of Chinese and Filipino children. Population Studies, 62(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1080/00324720802313553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strauss, J. A., & Thomas, D. (1995). Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family decisions In J. Behrman & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1883–2023). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Strauss, J. A., & Thomas, D. (2007). Health over the life course In T. P. Schultz & J. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3375–3474). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Vidmar, S., Carlin, J., Hesketh, K., & Kole, T. (2004). Standardizing anthropometric measures in children and adolescents with new functions for egen. The Stata Journal, 4(1), 50–55. Retrieved from
  28. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wu, X., & Li, L. (2012). Family size and maternal health: Evidence from the one-child policy in China. Journal of Population Economics, 25(4), 1341–1364. doi: 10.1007/s00148-011-0361-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu, M., & Sarri, R. (1997). Women’s health status and gender inequality in China. Social Science & Medicine, 45(12), 1885–1898. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00127-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhai, F., & Gao, Q. (2010). Center-based care in the context of one-child policy in China: Do child gender and siblings matter? Population Research and Policy Review, 29(5), 745–774. doi: 10.1007/s11113-009-9171-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang, J., Xu, P., & Liu, F. (2016). One-child policy and childhood obesity. China Economic Review. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.05.003.Google Scholar
  33. Zhu, W. X., Lu, L., & Hesketh, T. (2009). China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: Analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. The BMJ, 338(1211). doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1211.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations