Fathers’ Commute to Work and Children’s Social and Emotional Well-Being in Germany
- 511 Downloads
Using the German Socio-Economic Panel study, we addressed the main question: Is fathers’ commute to work associated with increases in child social and emotional well-being as measured in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires? If so, would this association be mediated by reduced time spent with children or moderated by change in family income due to commuting? The findings show that fathers’ daily commute to work was associated with more peer relationship problems, and it also appeared to be linked to more emotional symptoms and greater hyperactivity in children. Fathers’ weekly commute was also linked to child emotional problems. The likelihood of having peer relationship problems in children increased with the distance of fathers’ daily commute to work. This is one of only two studies on this important topic and much further research is warranted.
KeywordsChild social-emotional well-being Commuting to work Fathers Germany SDQ SOEP
Compliance with Ethical standards
The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baxter, J. (2007). When dad work long hours: How work hours are associated with fathering 4-5 year old children. Family Matters, 77, 60–69.Google Scholar
- Baxter, J., & Smart, D. (2010). Fathering in Australia among couple families with young children. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Family Matters, 88, 18–26.Google Scholar
- Boss, A., & Rosenschon, A. (2011). Subventionsabbau in Deutschland (Gutachten im Auftrag der INSM-Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft GmbH). Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft.Google Scholar
- Bradley, R. H. (2002). Environment and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting: Biology and ecology of parenting (Vol. 2, pp. 281–314). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Brooks-Gunn, J., Brown, B., Duncan, G. J., & Moore, K. A. (1995). Child development in the context of family and community resources: An Agenda for National Data Collections. In T. N. A. O. Sciences (Ed.), Integrating federal statistics on children: Report of a workshop (p. 27). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., & Valiente, C. (2002). Parenting and children’s prosocial and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Practical issues in parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 111–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Kainz, K., Willoughby, M. T., Vernon-Feagans, L., & Burchinal, M. R. (2012). Modeling family economic conditions and young children’s development in rural United States: Implications for poverty research. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(4), 410–420. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9287-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kendall, G. E., & Li, J. (2005). Early childhood socialization and social gradients in adult health: A commentary on singh-manoux and marmot’s “role of socialization in explaining social inequalities in health”. Social Science and Medicine, 61(11), 2272–2276. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamb, M. E. (2010). How do fathers influence children’s development? let me count the ways. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 1–26). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent-child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, volume 2, contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 3–42). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Nes, R. B., Hauge, L. J., Kornstad, T., Kristensen, P., Landolt, M. A., Eskedal, L. T., & Vollrath, M. E. (2014). The impact of child behaviour problems on maternal employment: A longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35(3), 351–361. doi: 10.1007/s10834-013-9378-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sandow, E. (2011). On the road. Social aspects of commuting long distances to work. Umeå: Department of Social and Economic Geography.Google Scholar
- Weiss, M. (2009). How do Germans react to the commuting allowance? (No. 88). Arqus-Diskussionsbeiträge zur quantitativen Steuerlehre.Google Scholar
- Zubrick, S. R., Silburn, S. R., & Prior, M. R. (2005). Resources and contexts for child development: Implications for children and society. In S. Richardson & M. R. Prior (Eds.), No time to lose: The wellbeing of Australia’s children (pp. 161–200). Canberra: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar