Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 14–26 | Cite as

The Effects of Parenthood on Workforce Participation and Income for Men and Women

  • Sheree J. Gibb
  • David M. FergussonEmail author
  • L. John Horwood
  • Joseph M. Boden
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examined the effects of parenthood on workforce participation for men and women in the Christchurch Health and Development Study, a 30-year longitudinal study of a birth cohort of 1,265 individuals born in New Zealand in 1977. The findings suggested that the effects of parenthood on workforce participation were different for men and women. For women, parenthood was associated with decreasing participation in paid employment and fewer hours worked. For men, however, parenthood was not associated with decreased workforce participation and in some cases was associated with increased working hours. These findings had consequences for personal income, with 83–90 % of the total gender income gap in this cohort being attributed to gender differences in the effects of parenthood. These findings suggest that parenthood has markedly different effects on workforce participation and income for men and women.

Keywords

Parenthood Gender differences Workforce participation Income Longitudinal study 

References

  1. Abroms, L. C., & Goldscheider, F. K. (2002). More work for mother: How spouses, cohabiting partners and relatives affect the hours mothers work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(2), 147–166. doi: 10.1023/a:1015786600645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why?. The American Economic Review, 92(2), 354–358. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083431. Accessed 3 Sep 2011.
  3. Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2003). The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(2), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astone, N. M., Dariotis, J., Sonenstein, F., Pleck, J. H., & Hynes, K. (2010). Men’s work efforts and the transition to fatherhood. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, F. D. (1998). Trends in the well-being of American women, 1970–1995. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 112–165.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (1996). Wage structure and gender earnings differentials: An international comparison. Economica, 63(250 SUP), S29–S62. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030472497&partnerID=40&md5=13a1ed0e2c649a8ce7965eccec904d0f. Accessed 25 Aug 2011.
  8. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boden, J. M., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). Early motherhood and subsequent life outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(2), 151–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01830.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2003). A sticky floors model of promotion, pay, and gender. European Economic Review, 47(2), 295–322. doi:  10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00197-0. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292101001970. Accessed 24 Aug 2011.
  11. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657415. Accessed 24 Aug 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christie-Mizell, C. (2006). The effects of traditional family and gender ideology on earnings: Race and gender differences. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(1), 48–71. doi: 10.1007/s10834-005-9004-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciscel, D. H., Sharp, D. C., & Heath, J. A. (2000). Family work trends and practices: 1971 to 1991. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1023/a:1009475313602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, P. N., & Blanchi, S. M. (1999). Marriage, children, and women’s employment: What do we know? Monthly Labor Review, 122(12), 22–31.Google Scholar
  16. Dommermuth, L., & Kitterød, R. H. (2009). Fathers’ employment in a father-friendly welfare state: Does fatherhood affect men’s working hours? Community, Work and Family, 12(4), 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dribe, M., & Stanfors, M. (2009). Does parenthood strengthen a traditional household division of labor? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duncan, K. C. (1996). Gender differences in the effect of education on the slope of experience-earnings profiles: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1979–1988. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55(4), 457–471. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3487620. Accessed 15 Aug 2011.
  19. Elder, S. (2010). Women in labour markets: Measuring progress and identifying challenges. International Labour Organization: Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@emp_elm/@trends/documents/publication/wcms_123835.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  20. Elley, W. B., & Irving, J. C. (1976). Revised socio-economic index for New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 11(1), 25–36.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, C. D., & Diekman, A. B. (2009). On motivated role selection: gender beliefs, distant goals, and career interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 235–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01493.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2001). The Christchurch Health and Development Study: Review of findings on child and adolescent mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35(3), 287–296. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00902.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Boden, J. M. (2006). Birth order and educational achievement in adolescence and young adulthood. Australian Journal of Education, 50(2), 122–139. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=22150584&site=ehost-live. Accessed 1 Sep 2011.Google Scholar
  24. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Lynskey, M. T. (1994). The childhoods of multiple problem adolescents: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(6), 1123–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., Shannon, F. T., & Lawton, J. M. (1989). The Christchurch Child Development Study: A review of epidemiological findings. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 3(3), 278–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1989.tb00382.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fergusson, D. M., Lynskey, M. T., & Horwood, L. J. (1996). Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: I. Prevalence of sexual abuse and factors associated with sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(10), 1355–1364. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199610000-00023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fretz, B. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (1982). Vocational behavior and career development, 1981: A review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21(2), 123–163. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(82)90026-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography, 46(2), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gjerdingen, D. K., & Center, B. A. (2005). First-time parents’ postpartum changes in employment, childcare, and housework responsibilities. Social Science Research, 34, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greene, W. T. (1990). Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Hamerle, A., & Ronning, G. (1995). Panel analysis for qualitative variables. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 401–451). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaumotte, F. (2003). Female labour force participation: Past trends and main determinants in OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. OECD Publishing: Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/5/31743836.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  34. Joshi, H., Macran, S., & Dex, S. (1996). Employment after childbearing and women’s subsequent labour force participation: Evidence from the British 1958 birth cohort. Journal of Population Economics, 9, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joshi, H., & Paci, P. (1998). Unequal pay for women and men: Evidence from the British birth cohort studies. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Joshi, H., Paci, P., & Waldfogel, J. (1999). The wages of motherhood: Better or worse? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(5), 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.126.4.593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luzzo, D. A., & McWhirter, E. H. (2001). Sex and ethnic differences in the perception of educational and career-related barriers and levels of coping efficacy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79(1), 61–67. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01944.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Macpherson, D. A., & Hirsch, B. T. (1995). Wages and gender composition: Why do women’s jobs pay less?. Journal of Labor Economics, 13(3), 426–471. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2535151. Accessed 17 Aug 2011.Google Scholar
  41. McKenna, D. J., & Johnson, D. A. (1981). Selection risk, sex-role stereotyping, and sex discrimination in employment decision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(3), 223–228. doi: 10.1002/job.4030020308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McWhirter, E. H. (1997). Perceived barriers to education and career: Ethnic and gender differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McWhirter, E. H., Torres, D., & Rasheed, S. (1998). Assessing barriers to women’s career adjustment. Journal of Career Assessment, 6(4), 449–479. doi: 10.1177/106907279800600406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, L., & Budd, J. (1999). The development of occupational sex-role stereotypes, occupational preferences and academic subject preferences in children at ages 8, 12 and 16. Educational Psychology, 19(1), 17–35. doi: 10.1080/0144341990190102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Molina, J., & Montuenga, V. (2009). The motherhood wage penalty in Spain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 237–251. doi:  10.1007/s10834-009-9153-z. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9153-z. Accessed 17 Aug 2011.
  46. Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 (1987).Google Scholar
  47. Employment Relations (flexible working arrangements) Amendment Act 2007 (2007).Google Scholar
  48. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2011). 20 Hours ECE Retrieved Sept 2, 2011, from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/Parents/EarlyYears/HowECEWorks/20HoursECE.aspx.
  49. Nsiah, C., DeBeaumont, R., & Ryerson, A. (2012). Motherhood and earnings: Wage variability by major occupational category and earnings level. Journal of Family and Economic Issues,. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9323-2.Google Scholar
  50. O’Dorchai, S. P. (2008). Do women gain or lose from becoming mothers? Brussels Economic Review, 51, 243–268.Google Scholar
  51. OECD (2007). Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) for OECD Countries since 1980. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/std/ppp.
  52. Petersen, T., Penner, A., & Hogsnes, G. (2007). From motherhood penalties to fatherhood premia: The new challenge for family policy. Berkeley: Working Paper Series. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.Google Scholar
  53. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender and Society, 11(6), 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. The World Bank (2012). World Development Report 2012: Gender, Equality and Development. World Development Report. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank: Washington DC. Retrieved from http://wdronline.worldbank.org//includes/imp_images/book_pdf/WDR_2012.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2012.
  57. Tinklin, T., Croxford, L., Ducklin, A., & Frame, B. (2005). Gender and attitudes to work and family roles: The views of young people at the millennium. Gender and Education, 17(2), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van der Lippe, T., & Van Dijk, L. (2002). Comparative research on women’s employment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 221–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the ‘family gap’ in pay for women with children. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, L. J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2006). Gender differences in the transition to early parenthood. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 275–294. doi: 10.1017/S0954579406060159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright, R. E., & Ermisch, J. F. (1991). Gender discrimination in the British labour market: A reassessment. The Economic Journal, 101(406), 508–522. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2233556. Accessed 17 Aug 2011.Google Scholar
  63. Young, M., & Wallace, J. (2009). Family responsibilities, productivity, and earnings: A study of gender differences among Canadian lawyers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 305–319. doi: 10.1007/s10834-009-9158-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K.-Y. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42(1), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheree J. Gibb
    • 1
  • David M. Fergusson
    • 2
    Email author
  • L. John Horwood
    • 1
  • Joseph M. Boden
    • 1
  1. 1.Christchurch Health and Development StudyUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Christchurch Health and Development Study, Department of Psychological MedicineUniversity of Otago, ChristchurchChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations