Modeling Family Economic Conditions and Young Children’s Development in Rural United States: Implications for Poverty Research
- 1.1k Downloads
In this study we examined the additive and multiplicative relations between poverty status, material hardship, liquid assets, non-liquid assets, and children’s cognitive skills and social problems at 36 months. The data were from a representative sample of 1,292 children in six rural counties in the United States. Findings indicated that income, material hardship, and non-liquid assets explained unique variation in young children’s development. Material hardship was associated with more social problems for children. Poverty status was associated with lower cognitive skills, and non-liquid assets were associated with higher cognitive skills at 36 months. We concluded that models that estimate the relation between poverty and child outcomes without including measures of hardship and assets could be underspecified.
KeywordsPoverty Hardship Assets Child development
Support for this research was provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grants R01 HD51502 and P01 HD39667, with co-funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
- Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1994). Families and troubled times: Adopting to change in rural America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Dahl, G. B., & Lochner, L. (2005). The impact of family income on child achievement (working paper 11279). Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G., Ziol-Guest, K. M., & Kalil, A. (2010). Early childhood poverty and adult attainment. Behavior and Health, Child Development, 81, 306–325.Google Scholar
- Gershoff, E. T. (2003). Low income and hardship among America’s kindergarteners. In Living at the edge (research brief no. 3). New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.Google Scholar
- Holzer, H. (2007). The economic costs of childhood poverty: Testimony before the US House Committee on Ways and Means. Retrieved online from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=901032.
- Kochar, A. (1995). Explaining household vulnerability to idiosyncratic income shocks. The American Economic Review, 85, 159–164.Google Scholar
- Magnuson, K., & Vortuba-Drzal, E. (2008). Enduring influences on childhood poverty. Institute or Research on Poverty discussion paper 1348-08. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2008). Navigating resources for rural schools. Retrieved October 30, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/index.asp.
- National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (NRCIM). (2000). Executive summary. In J. P. Shonkoff & D. A. Phillips (Eds.), From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development (pp. 1–16). Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Phillips, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G., Klebanov, P., & Craine, J. (1998). Family background, parenting behaviors and the black-white test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 229–272). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
- Ratcliffe, C., Chen, H., Williams Shanks, T. R., Nam, Y., Schreiner, M., Zhan, M., & Sherraden, M. (2007). Assessing asset data on low-income households: Current availability and options for improvement. Part of the series, Poor finances: Assets and low-income households. Washington DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Satter Publisher, Inc.Google Scholar
- Save the Children. (2002, June). America’s forgotten children: Child poverty in rural America. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.savethechildren.org/usa/.
- Sherraden, M. (2008). IDAs and asset-building: Policy lessons and directions. Center for Social Development working paper no. 08-12. St. Louis, MO: Washington University.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2002). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence—Third Edition (WPPSI-III). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar