Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 191–203

Can Marriage Reduce Risky Health Behavior for African-Americans?

Original Paper


This paper estimates whether marriage can improve health outcomes for African-Americans through changes in risky health behaviors like smoking, drinking, and drug use. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health and propensity score matching methodology to account for the potential selection bias, the results show that marriage does lead to a reduction in risky health behaviors, specifically drinking and drug use. This question has important policy implications because if marriage has the same benefits for African-Americans as it does for the general population, social welfare programs can be re-evaluated to incorporate marriage promotion, and further support can be given to programs that decrease adverse health behaviors.


African-Americans Marriage Propensity score matching Risky health behaviors 


  1. Ali, M. M., Fang, H., & Rizzo, J. A. (2010). Body weight, self-perception, and mental health among adolescents. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 13(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
  2. Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence. Demography, 29(3), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, S., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.Google Scholar
  4. Caetano, R., Cunradi, C., Schafer, J., & Clark, C. (2000). Intimate partner violence and drinking patterns among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the U.S. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, A., & Etile, F. (2006). Don’t give up on me baby: Spousal correlation in smoking behaviour. Journal of Health Economics, 25(5), 958–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarkwest, A. (2006). Premarital characteristics, selection into marriage and African American martial disruption. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(3), 361–380.Google Scholar
  7. Coombs, R. (1991). Marital status and personal wellbeing: A literature review. Family Relations, 40(1), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effect in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluation of the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(488), 1053–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, G., Wilkerson, B., & England, P. (2006). Cleaning up their act: The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography, 43(4), 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldman, N. (1993). Marriage selection and mortality patterns: Inferences and fallacies. Demography, 30(2), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodman, E., & Capitman, J. (2000). Depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking among teens. Pediatrics, 106(4), 748–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallfors, D., Waller, M., Bauer, D., Ford, C. A., & Halpern, C. T. (2005). Which comes first in adolescence—Sex and drugs or depression? American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 29(3), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harknett, K., & McLanahan, S. S. (2004). Racial and ethnic differences in marriage after the birth of a child. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 790–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P., et al. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design [WWW document]. URL:
  16. Harris, K., Lee, H., & DeLeone, F. Y. (2010). Marriage and health in the transition to adulthood: Evidence for African-Americans in the add health study. Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1106–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckman, J. J., & Robb, R., Jr. (1985). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions: An overview. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heiland, F., & Liu, S. (2006). Family structure and wellbeing of out-of-wedlock children: The significance of the biological parents’ relationship. Demographic Research, 15, 61–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofferth, S. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being. Demography, 43(1), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iceland, J., Weinberg, D. H., & Steinmetz, E. (2002). Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, A. (2010). Stability of men’s interracial first unions: A test of educational differentials and cohabitation history. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(2), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2003). Neighborhoods and health. New York City: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, R., Massoglia, M., & MacMillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, S., & Heiland, F. (2010). Should we get married? The effect of parent’s marriage on out-of-wedlock children. Economic Inquiry. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00248.x.
  25. Malone, K., Stewart, S. D., Wilson, J., & Korsching, P. F. (2010). Perceptions of financial well-being among American women in diverse families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manning, W., & Landale, N. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manning, W., & Smock, P. (1995). Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitators. Demography, 32(4), 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray, J. (2000). Marital protection and marital selection: Evidence from a historical-prospective sample of American men. Demography, 37(4), 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single. Population and Development Review, 16(4), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ross, C., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1990). The impact of the family on health: The decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 1059–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roy, K. (2005). Transitions on the margins of work and family life for low-income African-American fathers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabia, J. J., & Rees, D. I. (2008). The effect of adolescent virginity status on psychological wellbeing. Journal of Health Economics, 27(5), 1368–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schoen, R., Landale, N. S., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44(4), 807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skogrand, L., Johnson, A. C., Horrocks, A. M., & Defrain, J. (2010). Financial management practices of couples with great marriages. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Online First. doi:10.1007/s10834-010-9195-2.
  36. Thornton, M., & White-Means, S. I. (2000). Race versus ethnic heritage in models of family economic decisions. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Umberson, D. (1987). Family status and health behaviors: Social control as a dimension of social integration. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28(3), 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waldron, I., Hughes, M. E., & Brooks, T. L. (1996). Marriage protection and marriage selection—Perspective evidence for reciprocal effects of martial status and health. Social Science and Medicine, 43(1), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wherry, L., & Finegold, K. (2004). Marriage promotion and the living arrangements of Black, Hispanic, and White children. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Winkler, A. (1997). Economic decision making by cohabitors: Findings regard income-pooling. Applied Economics, 29(8), 1079–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Toledo and Office of Regulations, Policy & Social Science, Food & Drug AdministrationCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations