Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 121–137 | Cite as

Marriage and the Allocation of Assets in Women’s Defined Contribution Plans

Original Paper

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to understand the effect of family decision-making on the investment decisions of married men and women. Using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, we investigate how the spouse’s relative control over financial resources in the household and the life-cycle stage affect the investment choices of married women and men. The results show that married women who have more control over the financial resources are less likely to invest their Defined Contribution Plans (DCPs) in risky assets. Also, women who are married to relatively older men are less likely to take on risk with their DCPs. There is little evidence that the wife’s characteristics affect the investment decisions of married men.

Keywords

Gender Financial decision-making Investment choice Risk aversion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a grant from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR). This grant was awarded through the CRR’s Steven H. Sandell Grant Program for Junior Scholars in Retirement Research. The opinions and conclusions are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinion or policy of SSA or any agency of the Federal Government or of the CRR. We are grateful to the U.S. Social Security Administration and the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) for their generous financial support. This research was awarded the CFP Board’s American Council on Consumer Interests (ACCI) Financial Planning Paper Award. We graciously thank the CFP Board for their recognition and support of this research. We also thank Vickie Bajtelsmit, Alexandra Bernasek, Julianne Cullen, Shoshana A. Grossbard, Nancy Jianakoplos, Kristin Kleinjans, Ann Huff Stevens, and three anonymous referees and the editor, Jing Xiao, the associate editor, Alberto Molina, and seminar participants in the Department of Economics at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Boğaziçi University, and the ASSA meetings, and public finance participants in the CSWEP Junior Faculty Mentoring Program for providing us valuable feedback.

References

  1. Ameriks, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (September 2004). How do household portfolio shares vary with age? TIAA-CREF working paper. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=292017.
  2. Bajtelsmit, V., Bernasek, A., & Jianakoplos, N. (1999). Gender differences in defined contribution pension decisions. Financial Services Review, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasek, A., & Bajtelsmit, V. (2002). Predictors of women’s involvement in household financial decision-making. Financial Counseling and Planning, 13, 39–48.Google Scholar
  5. Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S. (2001). Gender, risk, and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 345–356.Google Scholar
  6. Bodie, Z., & Crane, D. B. (1997). Personal investing: Advice, theory and evidence. Financial Analysts Journal, 53(6), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browning, M. (2000). The saving behavior of a two-person household. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrnes, J., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychology Bulletin, 125, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaulk, B., Johnson, P. J., & Bulcroft, R. (2003). Effects of marriage and children on financial risk tolerance: A synthesis of family development and prospect theory. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobbelsteen, S., & Kooreman, P. (1997). Financial management, bargaining and efficiency within the household: An empirical analysis. De Economist, 145, 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donkers, B., Melenberg, B., & Van Soest, A. (2001). Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: A large sample approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer, P. D., Gilkenson, J. H., & List, J. A. (2002). Gender differences in revealed risk taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors. Economic Letters, 76, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Employee Benefit Research Institute. (2001). Women in retirement. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.ebri.org/pdf/publications/facts/1101fact.pdf.
  14. Employee Benefit Research Institute. (2003). Private pension plans, participation, and assets: Update. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.ebri.org/publications/facts/index.cfm?fa=0103fact.
  15. Finke, M. S., & Huston, S. J. (2003). The brighter side of financial risk: Financial risk tolerance and wealth. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24, 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freund, R. J., & Littell, R. C. (2000). SAS system for regression. Cary: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Friedberg, L., & Webb, A. (2006). Determinants and consequences of bargaining power in households. NBER working paper series, 12367. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12367.
  18. Friend, I., & Blume, M. E. (1975). The demand for risky assets. American Economic Review, 65, 900–922.Google Scholar
  19. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Gujarati, D. N. (2002). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill College.Google Scholar
  21. Heaton, J., & Lucas, D. (2000). Portfolio choice and asset prices: The importance of entrepreneurial risk. Journal of Finance, 55, 1163–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinz, R., McCarthy, D., & Turner, J. (1997). Are women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant-directed pension investments. In M. Gordon, O. Mitchell, & M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hudgens, G. A., & Fatkin, L. T. (1985). Sex differences in risk taking: Repeated sessions on a computer-simulated task. Journal of Psychology, 119, 197–206.Google Scholar
  24. Jianakoplos, N. A., Bajtelsmit, V. L., & Bernasek, A. (2003). How marriage matters to pension investment decisions. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 57, 48–57.Google Scholar
  25. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (2008). Family financial risk taking when the wife earns more. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levin, I. P., Synder, M. A., & Chapman, D. P. (1988). The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. Journal of Psychology, 122, 173–181.Google Scholar
  28. Lindamood, S., Hanna, S. D., & Bi, L. (2007). Using the survey of consumer finances: Methodological considerations and issues. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 195–214.Google Scholar
  29. Lundberg, S. J., & Pollak, R. (1994). Non-cooperative bargaining models of marriage. American Economic Review, 84(2), 132–137.Google Scholar
  30. Lundberg, S. J., & Pollak, R. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139–158.Google Scholar
  31. Lundberg, S. J., Startz, R., & Stillman, S. (2003). The retirement-consumption puzzle: A marital bargaining approach. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1199–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundberg, S. J., & Ward-Batts, J. (2000). Saving for retirement: Household bargaining and household net worth. Working paper. University of Michigan: Michigan Retirement Research Center. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.mrrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/conference/pdf/cp00_lundberg.pdf.
  33. Malone, K., Stewart, S. D., Wilson, J., & Korsching, P. F. (2010). Perceptions of financial well-being among American women in diverse families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merton, R. C. (1969). Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The time case. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Molina, J. A., & Montuenga, V. M. (2009). The motherhood wage penalty in Spain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riley, W. B., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samuelson, P. A. (1969). Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanders, C. K., & Porterfield, S. L. (2010). The ownership society and women: Exploring female householders’ ability to accumulate assets. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31, 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2003). Pension wealth: Gender, risk and portfolio choices. Essays on gender differences in economic decision-making, Ph.D. Dissertation, Swedish Institute for Social Research: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  41. Siegel, F. W., & Hoban, J. P. (1982). Relative risk aversion revisited. Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sundén, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.Google Scholar
  43. Sung, J., & Hanna, S. D. (1998). The spouse effect on participation and investment decisions for retirement funds. Financial Counseling and Planning, 9, 47–58.Google Scholar
  44. Uccello, C. E. (2000). Do spouses coordinate their investment decisions in order to share risks? Center for Retirement Research, WP 2000–2009. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://crr.bc.edu/images/stories/Working_Papers/wp_2000-09.pdf.
  45. Ulker, A. (2009). Wealth holdings and portfolio allocation of the elderly: The role of marital history. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration. (2006). Private pension plan bulletin abstract of 2003 from 5500 annual reports. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/PDF/2003pensionplanbulletin.PDF.
  47. Woolley, F. (2003). Control over money in marriage. In S. A. Grossbard-Shechtman (Ed.), Marriage and the economy: Theory and evidence from advanced industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Yilmazer, T. (2008). Saving for children’s college education: An empirical analysis of the trade-off between the quality and quantity of children. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, M. C., & Wallace, J. E. (2009). Family responsibilities, productivity, and earnings: A study of gender differences among Canadian lawyers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Personal Financial PlanningUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations