Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 67–79 | Cite as

Labor Force Supply Decisions of Rural Low-Income Mothers

  • Sheila Mammen
  • Daniel Lass
  • Sharon B. Seiling
Original Paper

Abstract

Employment is crucial to the economic well-being of families. Using a multi-state sample of 412 rural low-income mothers, our study identifies factors influencing two employment decisions they make: labor force entry and number of hours supplied. A logistic regression model correctly predicted 80% of mothers’ work participation decisions. Employed mothers were older, better educated, and less likely to suffer from depression; as well as, more likely to have a driver’s license and receive child care assistance and the Earned Income Tax Credit. An estimated labor supply function explained 33% of the variation in hours worked by the 208 employed rural mothers. Higher wages, availability of health insurance, and overtime benefits predicted the number of hours they were willing to work.

Keywords

Labor force participation Rural low-income mothers Women’s labor supply 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by USDA/CSREES/NRICGP Grant Number 2001-35401-10215 & 2002-35401-11591, 2004-35401-14938. Data were collected in conjunction with the cooperative multi-state research project, NC-223/NC-1011, “Rural Low–Income Families: Monitoring Their Well-being and Functioning in the Context of Welfare Reform.” Cooperating states are California, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, and Oregon. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Megan Dolan, graduate research assistant, Peter St. Marie and Thomas Martin, undergraduate research assistants, all at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

References

  1. Acs, G., & Loprest, P. (1999). The effect of disabilities on exits from AFDC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartik, T. J. (1997). Jobs for welfare recipients. Employment research. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.upjohninst.org/publications/newsletter/tjb597.pdf.
  3. Bassuk, E. L., Weinreb, L. F., Buckner, J. C., Browne, A., Salomon, A., & Bassuk, S. S. (1996). The characteristics and needs of sheltered homeless and low-income housed mothers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 640–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baydar, N., Joesch, J. M., Kieckhefer, G., Kim, H., & Greek, A. (2007). Employment behaviors of mothers who have a child with asthma. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beggs, J. J., Haines, V. A., & Hulbert, J. S. (1996). Revisiting the rural-urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings. Rural Sociology, 61, 306–325.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, L., Olson, L., & Conrad, A. (1992). Causes and implications of rapid job loss among participants in welfare-to-work programs (Working Paper 92–1). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winkler, A. E. (2002). The economics of women, men, and work (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, D., & Michalopoulos, C. (2001). How welfare and work policies affect employment and income: A synthesis of research. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Blundell, R. W., & MaCurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 1559–1695). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Boushey, H. (2002). Staying employed after welfare: Work supports and job quality vital to employment tenure and wage growth (EPI Briefing Paper 128). Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/briefingpapers_bp128.
  11. Boushey, H., & Rosnick, D. (2004). For welfare reform to work, jobs must be available. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/welfare_reform_2004_04.pdf.
  12. Brandon, P. D. (2000). Child care utilization among working mothers raising children with disabilities. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandon, P. D., & Hogan, D. P. (2001). The effects of children with disabilities on mothers’ exit from welfare (JCPR Working Paper 300). Chicago: Joint Center for Poverty Research, Northwestern University/University of Chicago. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.jcpr.org/wpfiles/brandon_hogan_SRI2001.pdf.
  14. Brewster, K. L., & Padovic, I. (2002). No more kin care? Change in black mothers’ reliance on relatives for child care, 1977–94. Gender & Society, 16, 546–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colten, M. E., Consenza, C., & Allard, M. A. (1996). Domestic violence among Massachusetts AFDC recipients: Preliminary results. Boston: University of Massachusetts, Center for Survey Research.Google Scholar
  16. Colton, C., Bania, N., Martin, T., & Lalich, N. (2003, June). How are they managing? A retrospective of Cuyahoga County families leaving welfare. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://hdl.handle.net/2186/ksl:2006052576/Lickfelt-HATMoct-2004.pdf.
  17. Committee on Ways and Means. (2000). 2000 green book (17th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.Google Scholar
  18. Connolly, R., & Kimmel, J. (2000). Marital status and full-time/part-time work status in child care choices. Retrieved August 19, 2006, from http://www.upjohninst.org/publications/wp/99-58.pdf.
  19. Curcio, C. (1997). The Passaic county study of AFDC recipients in a welfare-to-work program. Passaic County, N.J.: Passaic County Board of Social Services.Google Scholar
  20. Danziger, S. (2002). Approaching the limit: Early national lessons from welfare reform. In B. A. Weber, G. J. Duncan, & L. A. Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions (pp. 25–49). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  21. Duncan, G., Whitener, L. A., & Weber, B. A. (2002). Lessons learned: Welfare reform and food assistance in rural America. In B. A. Weber, G. J. Duncan, & L. A. Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions (pp. 455–470). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E.Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  22. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Ellwood, D. T. (2000). The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage and living arrangements (JCPR Working Papers 124). Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.jcpr.org/wp/wpdownload.cfm?pdflink=wpfiles/ellwood_eitc99_update.PDF.
  24. Feindis, J. L., & Jensen, L. (1998). Employment opportunities in rural areas: Implications for poverty in a changing policy environment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 1000–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fremstad, S. (2004, January 30). Recent welfare reform research findings: Implications for TANF reauthorization and state TANF policies. Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http://www.cbpp.org/1-30-04wel.htm.
  26. Grogger, J. (2003). The effects of time limits, the EITC, and other policy changes on welfare use, work, and income among female-headed families. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hao, L. (1996). Family structure, private transfers, and the economic well-being of families with children. Social Forces, 75, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, E. (1999). Short term and long term effects of early parental employment on children of the national longitudinal survey of youth. Development Psychology, 35, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henry, M., & Drabenstott. M. (1996). A new micro view of the U.S. rural economy. Economic Review, 2nd Quarter, 53–70.Google Scholar
  30. Herbst, C. M., & Barnow, B. S. (2007). Close to home: A simultaneous equations model of the relationship between child care accessibility and female labor force participation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hotz, J., & Scholz, J. (2003). The earned income tax credit. In R. A. Moffitt (Ed.), Means-tested transfer programs in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hunts, H. J. H., & Avery, R. J. (1998). Relatives as child care givers: After hours support for nontraditional workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kooreman, P., & Wunderink, S. (1997). The economics of household behavior. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, S., Oh, G-T., Hartmann, H., & Gault, B. (2004). The Impact of disabilities on mothers’ work participation: Examining differences between single and married mothers. Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/DisabilityMothersWork.pdf.
  35. Leon, A. C., & Weissman, M. M. (1993). Analysis of NIMH’s existing epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) data on depression and other affective disorders in welfare and disabled populations. New York: Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.Google Scholar
  36. Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Livermore, M. M., & Powers, R. S. (2006). Employment of unwed mothers: The role of government and social support. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lloyd, S. (1996). The effects of violence on women’s employment. Chicago: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  39. Looney, A. (2005). The effect of welfare reform and related policies on single mothers’ welfare use and employment in the 1990s. (Finance and Economics Discussion Series.) U.S. Federal Reserve, Division of Research and Statistics and Monetary Affairs. Retrieved August 27, 2006, from http://www.federalreserve.gov/Pubs/feds/2005/200545/200545pap.pdf.
  40. Loprest, P. (2003, August). Fewer welfare leavers employed in weak economy. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310837.
  41. Martinson, K. (2000). The national evaluation of welfare-to-work strategies: The experiences of welfare recipients who find jobs. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from www.mdrc.org/Reports2001/NEWWS_PE_Experiences/NEWWS-PE-Experiences.pdf.
  42. McKernan, S.-M., Lerman, R., Pindus, N., & Valente, J. (2002). The impact of welfare policy on the employment of single mothers living in rural and urban areas. In B. A. Weber, G. J. Duncan, & L. A. Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions (pp. 257–286). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E.Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  43. Meyer, B. D., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers on welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1063–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, R. J., & Darlington, Y. (2002). Who supports? The providers of social support to dual-parent families caring for young children. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moffitt, R. A. (2002). From welfare to work: What the evidence shows. Retrieved August 27, 2006, from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2002/01welfare_moffitt/pb13.pdf.
  46. Moore, K. A., Zaslow, M., Coiro, M. J., Miller, S. M., & Magenheim, E. B. (1995). How well are they faring? AFDC families with preschool-aged children in Atlanta at the outset of the JOBS evaluation. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  47. Mroz, T. A. (1987). The sensitivity of an empirical model for married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica, 55, 765–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson, M. K., & Smith, J. (1999). Working hard and making do: Surviving in small town America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1997). Familial factors associated with the characteristics of nonmaternal care for infants. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Neill, J. E., & Hill, A. M. (2001). Gaining ground? Measuring the impact of welfare reform on welfare and work (Civic Report 17). Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/Cr_17.pdf.
  51. Olson, K., & Pavetti, L. (1996). Personal and family challenges to the successful transition from welfare to work. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  52. Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 981–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Polit, D. F., Widom, R., Edin, K., Bowie, S., London, A. S., Scott, E. K., & Valenzuela, A. (2001). Is work enough? The experiences of current and former welfare mothers who work. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/74/full.pdf.
  54. Quint, J., & Musick, J. (1994). Lives of promise, lives of pain: Young mothers after New Chance. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Project.Google Scholar
  55. Quint, J., Polit, D., Bos, H., & Cave, G. (1994). New Chance: Interim findings on a comprehensive program for disadvantaged young mothers and their children. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  56. Ribar, D. (2000). Transitions from welfare and the employment prospects of low-skill workers. Southern Economic Journal, 71, 514–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ross Phillips, K. (2002). Parent work and child well-being in low-income families. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/310509_OP56.pdf.
  58. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economics Review, 51, 1–17.Google Scholar
  59. Seiling, S. (2004). Family sustainability: Views from Ohio rural low-income mothers and county leaders. Paper presented at Cultures, Governance and Rural Poverty in the Midwest: Toward a Regional Research Framework to Reduce Poverty. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  60. Shank, S. E. (1988). Women and the labor market: The link grows stronger. Monthly Labor Review, 111(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  61. Sherman, A., Fremstad, S., & Parrott, S. (2004). Employment rates for single mothers fell substantially during recent period of labor market weakness. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.cbpp.org/6-22-04ui.pdf.
  62. United States Bureau of the Census. (n.d.). Historical poverty tables (Table 4). Retrieved April 30, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov4.html.
  63. United States Department of Labor. (2007). Quick stats 2006. Retrieved April 30, 2007, from http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/main.htm.
  64. Urban, J. A., & Olson, P. N. (2005). A comprehensive employment model for low-income mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wan, C. K., Jaccard, J., & Ramey, S. L. (1996). The relationship between social support and life satisfaction as a function of family structure. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Warr, P. (1999). Well-being and the workplace. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 392–412). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  67. Weber, B., & Jensen, L. (2004). Poverty and place: A critical review of the rural poverty literature. Retrieved on September 10, 2006, from http://www.rprconline.org/WorkingPapers/WP0403.pdf.
  68. Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes for different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wheelock, J., Oughton, E., & Baines, S. (2003). Getting by with a little help from your family: Toward a policy-relevant model of the household. Feminist Economics, 9(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zaslow, M. J., & Emig, C. A. (1997). When low-income mothers go to work: Implications for children. The Future of Children, 7(1), 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zaslow, M. J., Hair, E. M., Dion, R., Ahluwalia, S. K., & Sargent, J. (2001). Maternal depressive symptoms and low literacy as potential barriers to employment in a sample of families receiving welfare: Are there two-generational implications? Women and Health, 32(3), 211–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila Mammen
    • 1
  • Daniel Lass
    • 2
  • Sharon B. Seiling
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Resource EconomicsUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Resource EconomicsUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  3. 3.Department of Consumer SciencesOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations