Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 601–622

How Retired Households and Households Approaching Retirement Handle Their Equity Investments in the United States

Original Paper

Abstract

This study examines how U.S. retired households and households approaching retirement change their equity holdings over time. Applying a decomposition analysis on the repeated cross-sectional U.S. Survey of Consumer Finances from 1989 to 2004, this study presents the effects of change in population size including mortality, change in financial wealth, and change in preference on the change in aggregate financial asset share invested in equity. A formal regression-based decomposition is also provided. It was found that there is a convex relationship between age and equity holdings as a share to financial assets for the older population. In addition, the risk-taking attitude-equity holdings profile shifted upward during the period of 1989 to 2004 for the older population. It is further documented that 70% of those senior equity investors chose financing retirement and financing future liquidity as the primary saving goals. Therefore, longevity pattern plays an important role for older population to hold equity.

Keywords

Equity holdings Elderly Retirement 

References

  1. Abel, A. (2001). Will bequests attenuate the predicted meltdown in stock prices when baby boomers retire? Review of Economic and Statistics, 83, 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameriks, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2001). How do household portfolio shares vary with age? (Working paper). New York: Columbia University Business School.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, A., & Maddaloni, A. (2005). Do demographic changes affect risk premiums? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business, 78, 341–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakshi, G. S., & Chen, Z. (1994). Baby boom, population aging and capital markets. Journal of Business, 67, 165–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellante, D., & Green, C. (2004). Relative risk aversion among the elderly. Review of Financial Economics, 3, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellante, D., & Saba, R. (1986). Human capital and life-cycle effects on risk aversion. Journal of Financial Research, 9, 41–51.Google Scholar
  7. Bergantino, S. M. (1998). Lifecycle investment behavior, demographics and asset prices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Bodie, Z., Merton, R. C., & Samuelson, W. F. (1992). Labour supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life cycle model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 16, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, R. J. (1998). Asset market and saving effects of demographic transitions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  10. Brooks, R. J. (2002). Asset market effects of the baby boom and social security reforms. American Economic Review, 92, 402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucks, B. K., Kennickell, A. B., & Moore, K. B. (2006). Recent changes in U.S. family finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 92, A1–A38.Google Scholar
  12. Canudas-Romo, V. (2003). Decomposition methods in demography. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rozenberg.Google Scholar
  13. Capgemini Consulting. (2007). The boomer effect: The impact of baby boomer retirement on corporate America. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://www.us.capgemini.com.
  14. Christelis, D., Jappelli, T., & Padula, M. (2005). Wealth and portfolio composition. (Working Papers 132). University of Salerno, Italy: Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF).Google Scholar
  15. Constantinides, G., Donaldson, J. B., & Mehra, R. (2002). Junior can’t borrow: A new perspective on the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Donaldson, J. B., & Maddaloni, A. (2002). The impact of demographic differences on asset pricing in an equilibrium model. (Working paper). New York: Columbia University Business School.Google Scholar
  18. Dosman, D., Fast, J., Chapman, S., & Keating, N. (2006). Retirement and productive activity in later life. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 27, 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Erb, C. B., Harvey, C. R., & Viskanta, T. E. (1997). Demographics and international investments. Financial Analysts Journal, 53, 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finke, M. S., Huston, S. J., & Sharpe, D. L. (2006). Balance sheets of early boomers: Are they different from pre-boomers? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 542–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fry, M. J., & Mason, A. (1982). The variable rate-of-growth effect in the life-cycle saving model. Economic Inquiry, 20, 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goyal, A. (2004). Demographics, stock market flows and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurd, M. D. (2001). Portfolio holdings of the elderly. In L. Guiso, M. Haliassos, & T. Jappelli (Eds.), Household portfolios (pp. 431–472). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Investment Company Institute. (2007). Investment company fact book. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.icifactbook.org.
  25. Jianakoplos, N., & Bernasek, A. (2006). Financial risk taking by age and birth cohort. Southern Economic Journal, 72, 981–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kivett, V. R., & Schwenk, F. N. (1994). The consumer expenditures of elderly women: Racial, marital, and rural/urban impacts. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 15, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lai, C. (2006). Determinants of portfolio efficiency losses in U.S. self-directed pension accounts. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 601–625.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, Y. G., Lown, J. M., & Sharpe, D. L. (2007). Predictors of holding consumer and mortgage debt among older Americans. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindamood, S., Hanna, S. D., & Bi, L. (2007). Using the survey of consumer finances: Methodological considerations and issues. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 195–214.Google Scholar
  30. Mankiw, N. G., & Weil, D. N. (1989). The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montalto, C. P., & Sung, J. (1996). Multiple imputations in the 1992 survey of consumer finances. Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 133–146.Google Scholar
  32. Morin, R. A., & Suarez, F. (1983). Risk aversion revisited. Journal of Finance, 38, 1201–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palsson, A. (1996). Does the degree of relative risk aversion vary with household characteristics? Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 771–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Park, D., & Rhee, C. (2005). Saving, growth, and demographic change in Korea. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 19, 394–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poterba, J. M. (2001). Demographic structure and asset returns. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. U. S. Census Bureau. (2008). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, H., & Hanna, D. (1997). Does risk tolerance decrease with age? Financial Counseling and Planning, 8, 27–31.Google Scholar
  38. Xiao, J. J., & Anderson, J. G. (1997). Hierarchical financial needs reflected by household financial asset shares. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18, 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoo, P. S. (1994). Age distributions and returns of financial assets. (Working Paper # 94–002A). St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceYuan-Ze UniversityChung-LiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations