Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 166–184 | Cite as

Path to Poverty Alleviation: Marriage or Postsecondary Education?

Original Paper

Abstract

We examined the role of human capital in determining economic well-being and marital status of mothers with children. We analyzed 1996 data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), a nationally representative survey of 36,700 American households conducted by the Census Bureau. The results indicate that among the human capital variables postsecondary education significantly improves the economic well-being of mothers irrespective of their marital status. Also, educated mothers are more likely to be married. These findings are especially relevant as we debate the importance of marriage in poverty alleviation.

Keywords

Economic well-being Marital status Postsecondary education Welfare reform 

References

  1. Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biddlecom, A. E., & Kramarow, E. A. (1998). Household headship among married women: The roles of economic power, education, and convention. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19(4), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, F. D. (1998). Trends in the well-being of American women, 1970–1995. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 112–165.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., & Waldforgel, J. (2000). Understanding young women’s marriage decisions: The role of labor and marriage market conditions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53(4), 624–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2001). First marriage dissolution, divorce, and remarriage: United States. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 323. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved 1 Nov 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad323.pdf.
  7. Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Series report 23, Number 22. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Statistics. Retrieved 20 Feb 2003, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf.
  8. Coffield, C. D. (2002). Welfare reform in Indiana: The political economy of restricting access to education and training. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(3), 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cott, N. F. (2000). Public vows: A history of marriage and the nation. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Lee, C. H. (2005). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Current population reports. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved 1 Aug 2006, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf.
  11. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Temporary assistance for needy families program (TANF). Fifth annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family Assistance. Retrieved 20 Feb 2003, from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/ofa/annualreport5/index.htm.
  12. Dew, J. (2007). Two sides of the same coin? The differing roles of assets and consumer debt in marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon, C. S., & Rettig, K. D. (1994). An examination of income adequacy for single women two years after divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 22(1–2), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edin, K. (2000). Few good men: Why low-income single mothers don’t get married. The American Prospect, 11(4), 26–31.Google Scholar
  15. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fein, D. (2004). Married and poor: Basic characteristics of economically disadvantaged married couples in the U.S. Working paper SHM-01. Supporting healthy marriage evaluation. Retrieved 3 Nov 2005, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/393/workpaper.pdf.
  17. Freeman, C. E. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004 (NCES 2005-016). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 30 Oct 2006, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005016.pdf.
  18. Gudmunson, C. G., Beutler, I. F., Israelsen, C. L., McCoy, J. K., & Hill, E. J. (2007). Linking financial strain to marital instability: Examining the roles of emotional distress and marital interaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(3), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halvorsen, R., & Palmquiest, R. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review, 70(3), 474–475.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, C. A., Stanley, S.M., Glenn, N. D., Amato, P. R., Nock, S.L., Markman, H. J., et al. (2002). Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 baseline state-wide survey on marriage and divorce. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University, Bureau for Social Research.Google Scholar
  21. Jones-DeWeever, A. (2002). Marriage promotion and low-income communities: An examination of real needs and real solutions. Briefing paper, IWPR Publication # D450. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Washington, DC. Retrieved 29 Oct 2006, from http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/d450.pdf.
  22. LeRoy, D. (2001). West Virginia gives $100 welfare marriage bonus. Women’s eNews. Retrieved 1 Nov 2006, from http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/255/context/archive.
  23. Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(March), 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lichter, D. T., Graefe, D. R., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 60–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Long, S. J., & Miethe, T. D. (1988). The statistical comparison of groups. In J. Scott Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions (pp. 108–131). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P.D., et al. (2005). Births: Final data for 2003. National vital statistics reports; vol 54 no 2. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved 30 Oct 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_02.pdf.
  28. Mauldin, T. A. (1990). Women who remain above the poverty level in divorce: Implications for family policy. Family Relations, 39, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mauldin, T. A., & Mimura, Y. (2007). Marrying, unmarrying, and poverty dynamics among mothers with children living at home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(4), 566–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLanahan, S., Garfinkel, I., & Mincy, R. B. (2001). Fragile families, welfare reform, and marriage. Policy brief no. 10. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved 29 Oct 2006, from http://www.brookings.edu/es/wrb/publications/pb/pb10.pdf.
  31. McLanahan, S. S., & Sandefur, G. D. (1996). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, D. K., & Lichter, D. T. (1997). Poverty and the marital behavior of young women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer, D. R., & Cancian, M. (1998). Economic well-being following an exit from aid to families with dependent children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(2), 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mincer, J. (1979). Human capital and earnings. In D. M. Windham (Ed.), Economic dimensions of education (pp. 1–31). Washington, DC: The Academy.Google Scholar
  35. Mincer, J. (1989). Human capital and the labor market: A review of current research. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 27–34.Google Scholar
  36. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. (2003). Education, social status, and health (social institutions and social change). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  37. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ozawa, M. N. (1991). Basis of income support for children: A time for change. Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ozawa, M. N., & Lum, Y. (1998). Marital status and change in income status 10 years after retirement. Social Work Research, 22(2), 116–128.Google Scholar
  40. Pandey, S., & Zhan, M. (2007). Postsecondary education, marital status, and economic well-being of women with children. Social Development Issues, 29(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  41. Pandey, S., Zhan, M., & Kim, Y. (2006). A bachelor’s degree for women with children: A promising pathway to poverty reduction. Equal Opportunities International, 25(7), 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parke, M., & Ooms, T. (2002). More than a dating service? State activities designed to strengthen and promote marriage. Couples and marriage series, policy brief, brief no. 2. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Retrieved 24 Oct 2002, from http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1034879939.91/Marriage_Brief2.pdf.
  43. President’s Proposal (February 26, 2002). Working toward independence. Retrieved 26 May 2002, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/welfare-reform-announcement-book.pdf.
  44. Rank, M. R. (1987). The formation and dissolution of marriages in the welfare population. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rank, M. R. (2004). One nation, underprivileged: Why American poverty affects us all. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rector, R. (2001a). The effects of welfare reform. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Human Resources, The Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Retrieved 15 Mar 2002, from http://www.heritage.org/library/testimony/test031501b.html.
  47. Rector, R. (2001b). The good news about welfare reform. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Competitiveness, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved 15 Mar 2002, from http://www.heritage.org/library/testimony/pdf/test092001.pdf.
  48. Sigle-Rushton, W., & McLanahan, S. (2002). For richer or poorer? Marriage as an anti-poverty strategy in the United States. Population, 57(3), 509–526.Google Scholar
  49. Simmons, L. A., Braun, B., Wright, D.W., & Miller, S. R. (2007a). Human capital, social support, and economic well-being among rural, low-income mothers: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(4), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simmons, L. A., Dolan, E. M., & Braun, B. (2007b). Rhetoric and reality of economic self-sufficiency among rural, low-income mothers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(3), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smock, P. (1993). The economic costs of marital disruption for young women over the past two decades. Demography, 30(3), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smock, P. (1994). Gender and the short-run economic consequences of marital disruption. Social Forces, 73(1), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. South, S. J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 928–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The changing demography of America’s families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1234–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teti, D., & Lamb, M. (1989). Socioeconomic and marital outcomes of adolescent marriage, adolescent childbirth, and their co-occurrence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas, A., & Sawhill, I. (2002). For richer or for poorer: Marriage as an antipoverty strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 21(4), 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, J. J. (1993). Women, welfare, and college: The impact of higher education on economic well-being. Afflia, 8(4), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tuttle, R. C. (1989). Poverty over the family life cycle. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 10(4), 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004). Table POV04: Families by age of householder, number of children, and family structure: 2004 (Number in thousands). Below 100% of Poverty—All races. Retrieved 25 Oct 2006, from http://www.pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032005/pov/new04_100_01.htm.
  61. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005a). Table A-3. Mean earnings of workers 18 years and over, by educational attainment, race, Hispanic origin, and sex: 1975 to 2003. Retrieved 1 Apr 2005, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/tabA-3.pdf.
  62. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005b). Table 10. Educational attainment of the population 25 years and over, by citizenship, nativity and period of entry, age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 2004. Retrieved 1 Apr 2005, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/cps2004/tab10-01.pdf.
  63. U.S. Congress. (1996). The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Public Law 104-193.Google Scholar
  64. U.S. Congress. (2006). Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171.Google Scholar
  65. Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. J. (1997). Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S293–S329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, L., & Rogers, S. J. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wirt, J., Snyder, T., Sable, J., Choy, S. P., Bae, Y., Stennett, J., et al. (1998). The condition of education 1998 (NCES 98-013). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 26 Oct 2006, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98013.pdf.
  69. Zhan, M., & Pandey, S. (2004a). Postsecondary education and economic well-being of single mothers and single fathers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(3), 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhan, M., & Pandey, S. (2004b). Economic well-being of single mothers: Work first or postsecondary education? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXXI(3), 87–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Warren Brown School of Social WorkWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers School of Social WorkThe State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations